Bronze-level articleConservapedia:Machismo

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 18:53, 7 April 2012 by 98.246.173.144 (Talk)

Jump to: navigation, search
Conservlogo late april.png
Conservapedia
Introduction
Newcomer's Guide
What is going on?
Commentary
Best of Conservapedia
Blatant Plagiarism
Differences with Wikipedia
Hijacked Articles
"SDG"
"TZB"
"Fab Five"
Sysops
Timeline
CP in the News
In-depth analysis
Active users
Illustrated guide
Fun
Article Matrix
Greatest Insights
Parthian Shots

More about CP

Machismo is a term used on Conservapedia to describe the level of masculinity, or "Manly-man-ness" in men. It is a desirable attribute for a good, Christian, conservative man to have; conversely, liberal and atheist men are defined by their lack of machismo. In rare cases, such as that of Margaret Thatcher and Sarah Palin, it is possible for a woman to have machismo.

The meaning of the word in the original Spanish is something like "Attitude and actions of those who discriminate against and underestimate (or perhaps 'look down on') women because they consider women to be inferior to men."[1]

The link between machismo and scientific and/or religious belief was first postulated in the seminal[2] work, Does Richard Dawkins Have Machismo?[3] by Ken DeMyer. The publication of this essay led to the forces of atheism and Darwinism on the internet being comprehensively defeated.

Contents

Characteristics of Machismo

Men with high levels of machismo are likely to be good, conservative, Christian men. They don't cook or do housework, as that is what women are for. They enjoy watching football (American football, not the girly soccer kind of football), drink American beer and eat bacon with all the fat left on. They attract the attention of lots of Hispanic ladies, and, for some reason, bulls.

Most importantly, they do not believe in evolution and regard atheism as being as bad as, if not worse than, communism. And they are definitely, definitely not homosexual or in any way obsessed with homosexuality. Sometimes they go weeks without thinking about homosexuality, unless the media makes them.[4][5]

Etymological insight

Macho grande

The Spanish word macho can refer to a steely hardened helically ribbed tool, used for shaping the insides of a wide variety of holes. The mode of application is thrusting and turning with force enough to make a permanent change to the interior of the workpiece. In English, this tool is called a "tap," demonstrating a tenuous etymological connection to the colloquial utterance, "I'd tap that."

Symptoms of a lack of Machismo

A lack of machismo will usually manifest itself in one or more of the following symptoms:

  • Being liberal
  • Being a liberal wiki vandal [6]
  • Being an atheist
  • Being female
  • Being a pantywaist
  • Being homosexual
  • Driving a "fuel efficient" vehicle (especially a Prius)
  • Being anti-war
  • Being an illegal Mexican immigrant
  • Using Linux [7][8]
  • Speaking French
  • Eating Sushi
  • Drinking Coke Zero
  • Enjoying creamy peanut butter [9]
  • Being divorced[10]

The Machismo Factor

Shockofgod-Machismo.ogg
"MA-CHEESE-MO", courtesy of Factor 5, dangerously manly, all-around super-Christian, Shockofgod.

Machismo is measured on a scientifically-backed five-part scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). The scale is a base-10 logarithmic scale, much like the Richter Scale, so someone with Machismo Factor 5 is 10 times more manly than someone with Machismo Factor 4, and 100 times more macho than someone with Machismo Factor 3.

A man with Machismo Factor 5 is referred to as having "MA-CHEESE-MO."

Remedies for Low Machismo

A machismo of Factor 1 is a terminal condition; 100% of people with Machismo Factor 1 will die -- or, worse, transition to female (if not already female). For the remaining population, a low machismo level can be treated with a combination of the following courses of action:

  • Watch a good, conservative movie, such as the John Wayne Vietnam War classic, The Green Berets
  • Go to an All You Can Eat diner and eat everything If you're an atheist they will get you for atheism and obesity.
  • Trade in your Japanese or European automobile for a Ford F450. If asked by a tree hugger about its fuel efficiency, tell them that it is very quick under acceleration. [11]
  • If female, stop shaving your legs and take up an activity like weightlifting, bullfighting, or smoking cigars. Of course, while this may increase your masculinity, it'll also prove you're a hairy-legged feminazi.
  • Pretend to be a caveman. Take up survivalism. Amass huge quantities of police and rescue gear. Masturbate often to build your testosterone level.
  • Crush your enemies by launching wiki projects linking them to homosexuality, atheism, mass murder, abortion, pseudoscience and whatever else comes up on your word-of-the-day calendar. Note that your role should only be to initiate these projects, writing the actual articles should be left to sissy parodists.
  • Take The M Factor training course from DeMyer himself, at the reasonable price of $1000 per hour.[12] Undetermined number of courses needed. Progression through M Factor course and to higher Machismo rating requires geometrically stepped higher payments. Course may have unintended side effects including, but not exclusive to: psychosis, delusion, hallucination, diarrhea, hair growth in unusual places, writing about homosexuality on the internet for 16 hours per day, short sightedness, loss of muscle definition. Please read the label and seek medical advice before taking course.

Quantifying Machismo

\mathrm{Machismo} = {\frac{\left(\mathrm{GentFr}+1\right) \cdot \mathrm{Edits} \cdot \mathrm{HotDogs} \cdot \mathrm{HitPic} \cdot \mathrm{Regards}} {\left(\mathrm{LadyFr} + 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - \mathrm{Chuck}\right)} }

where:

  • GentFr = number of gentleman friends with a machismo factor greater than 3
  • Edits = average number of separate edits needed to produce a coherent sentence
  • HotDogs = average number of Hot Dogs consumed per day
  • HitPic = number of Hitler pictures inserted into articles
  • Regards = number of occurences of the term "in/with regards to" per 1000 words posted
  • LadyFr = number of lady friends (including gentleman friends with a machismo factor less than three)
  • Chuck = 1 if you are Chuck Norris, 0 otherwise

Notable people, as measured by Machismo

Machismo factor 0

  • Trent Toulouse - Created a wiki specifically for people with a machismo level of 1 and therefore must have no machismo.[13]

Machismo factor 1

Machismo factor 2

  • Jon Stewart - liberal TV presenter, gains a point for being a baseball (good, American sport) fanatic
  • Bill Clinton - gets an extra point for being a Bubba, but really, how machismo can "I feel your pain" ever be?

Machismo factor 3

Machismo factor 4

Machismo factor 5

  • John Wayne - giving all to the war effort, he bravely sacrificed the opportunity to inevitably become a glorious, bemedalled WWII hero in order to make movies about being a glorious, bemedalled WWII hero not named Marion
  • Jesus - the original manly-man, before Jesus there was no machismo
  • Ken DeMyer - discoverer of the link between machismo and political leanings
  • Andrew Schlafly - paragon of christian, conservative men the world over
  • The Village People - good upstanding manly men encouraging the listener to join the YMCA and the navy
  • Phyllis Schlafly - loses point for having been a woman - regains point for being Andrew Schlafly's mommy

Machismo factor \infty

  • Chuck Norris - a level technically impossible to all other men

Footnotes

  1. Spanish definition
  2. sem·i·nal (adj.) 1. of, relating to, or consisting of semen
  3. Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?
  4. "I rarely think about the issue of homosexuality. When I do, it is generally only because the media covers it."
  5. Unless, of course, they find themselves deprived of access to women (prison, same-sex boarding school, Catholic priesthood) -- in which case they're not really gay as long as they're penetrating another man and not the other way around.
  6. Liberal wiki vandals lack machismo
  7. For the IronyGoogle Cache
  8. Someone may beg to differimg.
  9. [2]
  10. Ken DeMyer speculates that "Perhaps, if Richard Dawkins understood women better plus had machismo, he would still be married to his first wife!". Perhaps Dawkins could have avoided this by spending the past three years obsessively editing homosexuality related articles at a wikiimg of his choosing?
  11. Muscle cars are efficient, Andrew L Schlafly, 2010
  12. M factor coaching
  13. Though Wikipedia says it was PalMD, but obviously that's just liberal deceit.
  14. [1]img
  15. Retrieved from CP Mainpageright
  16. No, it wasn't Hillary.
Personal tools

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support