Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

Crocoduck

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 21:37, 9 May 2012 by ListenerX (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
This is the real deal!
The divine comedy

Creationism

Icon creationism.svg
Running gags
Jokes aside
Blooper reel
Take pity on the lonely crocoduck

Whom none do love not bird nor reptile

Across the fields he runs amuck

Proving evolution all the while

Crocoduck is a hypothetical animal intelligently designed by creationists intended to demonstrate that there is "no" transitional form between crocodiles and ducks.

The lack of existence of the crocoduck was first brought to light by Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort, during a televised debate wherein they explained the devastating lack of said animals needed to validate the Theory of Evolution.

We imagined would be genuine species-to-species transitional forms. We called one a 'crocoduck' and another was called a 'birddog.' This was to show exactly what evolutionists believe, but can't back up through the fossil record."
—Ray Comfort[1]

In 2009, fossils of duck-billed alligators were found. The genus have been named Anatosuchus (from elements meaning duck and crocodile). Although it would be more accurately be a "duckodile" as the positions of duck and crocodile are reversed between this and the original theory, we are anxiously waiting to see what chimera creationists will howl about next.

"TA DA!"

The crocoduck and other chimera actually hold an interesting place when considered as possible evidence. Creationists purport that chimera would be evidence of evolution, yet if such a chimera were actually found to exist, then it would actually serve as evidence against evolution. This yet further explains that creationists do not understand the actual claims made by evolution.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Except, of course, that dromaeosaurs like Velociraptor had feathers... that would kind of make them croco-ducks by any reasonable definition of the term, since dromaeosaurs were ancestral to birds and were distantly related to crocodiles by virtue of both being archosaurs ancestrally... yeah, but, you know, whatever, I guess.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools