Danth's Law

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Examples)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*[[Fox News]] - Declaring themselves "Fair and Balanced" does not, in fact, make them ''fair and balanced''. Indeed, it draws attention to the fact that they are [[conservative bias|no such thing]].
 
*[[Fox News]] - Declaring themselves "Fair and Balanced" does not, in fact, make them ''fair and balanced''. Indeed, it draws attention to the fact that they are [[conservative bias|no such thing]].
 
*The [[BNP]] - Although this is a slight perversion to "declaring victory", following harsh criticisms and protests due to their increased exposure in recent years, the BNP have essentially "[[persecution complex|declared persecution]]".
 
*The [[BNP]] - Although this is a slight perversion to "declaring victory", following harsh criticisms and protests due to their increased exposure in recent years, the BNP have essentially "[[persecution complex|declared persecution]]".
 +
*[[Global Warming]] - Even with incontrovertible evidence to prove that global warming is not man-made, alarmists and global elitists proclaim victory and that the subject is now closed to debate.
  
 
{{Internet laws}}
 
{{Internet laws}}
 
[[Category:Internet laws]]
 
[[Category:Internet laws]]

Revision as of 04:12, 15 December 2009

Danth's Law (also known as Parker's Law) states:

If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly.

It was formulated on the popular Roleplaying Game forum, RPG.net and named after the now-banned user who inspired it. As an internet discussion grows and grows, it's often tempting to declare victory and move on, especially if you've rammed the point home too many times and your opponent just ignores everything you say. In this case, declaring victory and moving on may be legitimate and excusable.

Unfortunately, the majority of the time, declaring victory is just spin; a last desperate attempt to trick people into believing you came out on top (providing that they don't actually go and read the discussion, of course). Sometimes, the individuals declaring victory may well be convinced that they're right, often they'll have gone into the discussion knowing that they're right and with no possible option that they might be wrong.

Examples

  • The Lenski Affair - Despite the thorough and scathing reply that indicated beyond all doubt that the research was correct, Andrew Schlafly decreed that his untenable position was, in fact vindicated by the response and that Richard Lenski has a poor attitude.
  • HowTheWorldWorks - Published a video entitled "My Annihilation of Thunderf00t", which of course, contained no such "annihilation" outside the title.
  • Fox News - Declaring themselves "Fair and Balanced" does not, in fact, make them fair and balanced. Indeed, it draws attention to the fact that they are no such thing.
  • The BNP - Although this is a slight perversion to "declaring victory", following harsh criticisms and protests due to their increased exposure in recent years, the BNP have essentially "declared persecution".
  • Global Warming - Even with incontrovertible evidence to prove that global warming is not man-made, alarmists and global elitists proclaim victory and that the subject is now closed to debate.

Template:Internet laws

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support