Debate:Creationism vs. Evolutionism
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Next debate question - Are fairies real) |
(→Next debate question - Are fairies real: I agree this page should not be posted on.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::I'm not so sure that people who do not agree with posting here would not post here. It is very likely that RW editors who feel that posting here is a waste of time would post here to explain that posting here is a waste of time. | ::::I'm not so sure that people who do not agree with posting here would not post here. It is very likely that RW editors who feel that posting here is a waste of time would post here to explain that posting here is a waste of time. | ||
::::Anyway, to answer your particular point, I would suggest that the essential "fairyness" of the fairy (or faery) in question would be the deciding factor rather than its bulk, attitude or ability with weapons. --[[User:Bob_M|Bob]][[User_Talk:Bob_M|<sup>"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that."</sup>]] 17:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ::::Anyway, to answer your particular point, I would suggest that the essential "fairyness" of the fairy (or faery) in question would be the deciding factor rather than its bulk, attitude or ability with weapons. --[[User:Bob_M|Bob]][[User_Talk:Bob_M|<sup>"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that."</sup>]] 17:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Reading through the above, I must say that I agree that RWians should refrain from posting here. SO why am I posting here? Well, if I don't post here, then nobody will be here to stand up for those who think this page is a waste of time. I am posting here because I feel it is important to post here to get the word out about how much I wish people wouldn't post here. But most of all, and in true, blue RationalWikian form, I'm posting here because I am drunk and bored. [[User:Reckless Noise Symphony|Reckless Noise Symphony]] ([[User talk:Reckless Noise Symphony|talk]]) 09:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 19 January 2014
Creationism vs. Evolutionism
Well, Evolutionism. Where's the debate? --Beenz715 (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- What's an "evolutionism," and are members of the laity allowed to hold one? Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Basic debate theme and purpose: "I'm right and you are wrong." Add details. Avoid specifying the terms of the debate, it's boring and might actually produce some agreement, thus defeating the purpose. Agreement is for wimps and losers. Disagree? Ah! Now we have a debate, because I'm right and you are wrong. Q.E.D. --Abd (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Next debate question - Are fairies real
I'm saying they are not; but I'm hoping for a debate on this important scientific question too.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 18:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree. The existence of fairies has been documented for years. Take a look at this indisputable photographic evidence. Conservative Punk (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- You're all spelling "faeries" wrong. Swerve (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spelling technicalities are a typical sign of a troll and certainly an example of liberal deceit! Conservative Punk (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
I feel like there's loads of debate topics that have been started at RW that could use some more love, but are being neglected in favour of whatever this is... Nullahnung (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- In favor of sanity? --Abd (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- I also agree that people should stop posting on this thread. Who agrees that people should not post on this thread? Our American listeners may want to Google "irony".--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 16:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- I dont agree so I can post here. People who do agree obviously would not. Are we talking fairies like tinkerbell or the FAE like banshees and the big pointy earred one with swords ? Hamster (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure that people who do not agree with posting here would not post here. It is very likely that RW editors who feel that posting here is a waste of time would post here to explain that posting here is a waste of time.
- Anyway, to answer your particular point, I would suggest that the essential "fairyness" of the fairy (or faery) in question would be the deciding factor rather than its bulk, attitude or ability with weapons. --Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 17:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Reading through the above, I must say that I agree that RWians should refrain from posting here. SO why am I posting here? Well, if I don't post here, then nobody will be here to stand up for those who think this page is a waste of time. I am posting here because I feel it is important to post here to get the word out about how much I wish people wouldn't post here. But most of all, and in true, blue RationalWikian form, I'm posting here because I am drunk and bored. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- I dont agree so I can post here. People who do agree obviously would not. Are we talking fairies like tinkerbell or the FAE like banshees and the big pointy earred one with swords ? Hamster (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- I also agree that people should stop posting on this thread. Who agrees that people should not post on this thread? Our American listeners may want to Google "irony".--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 16:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)