Debate:The Permissive Society

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Back on Track)
(Back on Track)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
We repress our natural desires to violence and other generally accepted societal ills. Why do we not also repress our base attraction to 'free' sexuality and the experimentation with drugs? Drugs are bad, they are proven to be bad (by science) and they ruin lives. We must repress this for the good of society. Any thoughts? [[User:MarkCarthy|MarkCarthy]] ([[User talk:MarkCarthy|talk]]) 16:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 
We repress our natural desires to violence and other generally accepted societal ills. Why do we not also repress our base attraction to 'free' sexuality and the experimentation with drugs? Drugs are bad, they are proven to be bad (by science) and they ruin lives. We must repress this for the good of society. Any thoughts? [[User:MarkCarthy|MarkCarthy]] ([[User talk:MarkCarthy|talk]]) 16:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 
:Yes. Nobody is taking you seriously, you are lame and unoriginal. You cry to daddy when people say mean words. make an new account, try to be less obvious. Now give Uncle Coppy a kiss. [[User:Copperhead|Copperhead]]<sup>[[User talk:Copperhead|Hisssssss]]</sup> 16:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 
:Yes. Nobody is taking you seriously, you are lame and unoriginal. You cry to daddy when people say mean words. make an new account, try to be less obvious. Now give Uncle Coppy a kiss. [[User:Copperhead|Copperhead]]<sup>[[User talk:Copperhead|Hisssssss]]</sup> 16:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 +
:No offence, but you always seem to be on the internet. You should really find something more productive to do with your time. [[User:MarkCarthy|MarkCarthy]] ([[User talk:MarkCarthy|talk]]) 16:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:06, 29 April 2012

Debate.JPG This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by MarkCarthy.

Has the permissive society gone too far?

Debate

We now tolerate racial and religious minorities, sexual minorities, and every kind of diversity imaginable. Some of this is positive (Racial discrimination is a cancerous growth in our history) Others not so much (Homosexuals are likely to engage in deviancy which damages society)

We tolerate drug and alcohol abuse, children disowning their parents. Where does it end? Our family values are decaying because of the influence of a leftist media with a Marxist bent. Where does it end? Where does it end?

I am trying to spark a discourse here. I know I haven't provided much in the way of substantive critique, merely the lamentation of one individual in the face of a permissive society, but I will respond to people who take umbrage to my remarks. MarkCarthy (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, you can do better sweetie. Hugs and kisses. CopperheadHisssssss 18:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Yup, because places with say, Same-Sex marriage, or homosexuals serving opening in the military have fallen completely into chaos.
Or rather, not. --Revolverman (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Does this pass for reasoned debate in this place? I think a little more substance is necessary. MarkCarthy (talk) 09:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
You want substance? Ok, then you start by stating just how homosexuals engaging in 'deviancy' is damaging society. And how gay marriage will destroy straight marriage. Go. --PsyGremlinPraat! 10:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Psygremlin; Homosexuality is a thought disorder. It isn't natural. What is natural about sticking your penis inside an anus? The function of sex is reproduction. Men who have sex with men cannot reproduce. It isn't natural and its disgusting. And unhygenic. It spreads venereal diseases. By rights it should have remained a psychologic condition. Now we've accepted it to the extent that gay people can adopt children. This absurd state of affairs - a dangerous social experiment that is reminiscent of revolutionary communism - will destroy the family and normalise what is an unhealthy and dangerous sexual deviancy. Gay marriage is another absurd manifestation of this deviancy as marriage is for one man and one woman. Anything else is dangerous and unhealthy. MarkCarthy (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Pfft, wow the lameness continues. Talsley is much more entertaining, Rob so much more crazy. This is some pitiful basement dwelling incompetnet trying to steal some of their attention. Try something else sugar. CopperheadHisssssss 12:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
For the sake of decency I won't be responding to Copperhead's baiting, immaturity and discourtesy. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
You can do better. Come on, provide some links to some right wing blogs or Fox rather than talking out your ass. CopperheadHisssssss 13:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Once again, I would request that you vacate yourself from this discourse if you are incapable of behaving with basic decency and respect for diversity. I assume this website doesn't tolerate such childishness - if this disruption continues I may have to seek disciplinary procedures in order to attain justice. MarkCarthy (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
You're a lame parodist, your stream of united bullshit and usage of British spelling pretty much scream it. Bad parodist, no cookies. CopperheadHisssssss 14:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

So, I see you're anti sticking-penis-in-butts. Is that only for two men, or would you be fine with a man sticking his penis into a female butt? Or will that destroy society, too? ±Knightoftldrsig.pngKnightOfTL;DRwalls of text while-u-wait 14:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't want to legislate against homosexual activity. I just don't believe it is right that their relationships should be recognised by our laws, or that their deviancy be rewarded by adoption. Two men cannot raise a child. A family has a maternal and a paternal figure. The permissive society is encroaching on the traditional family unit, the most important network in society. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question. Do you, or do you not, approve of sticking penises into female butts? ±Knightoftldrsig.pngKnightOfTL;DRgoing galt: the literal crazy train 14:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
I think this calls for a research project. I offer myself as a "lab rat" if you will. I'm not that bothered if I'm the sticker or the stuck but, let's try mass male/male sodomy followed by mass male/female sodomy and measure the effect on society. We can even try female/female sodomy (strap-ons permitting). This is important scientific research. Who else is up for it? Bad Faith (talk) 14:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Ooh ooh! CopperheadHisssssss 14:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
OK, so you say that you need more information on sticking penises into the butts of biological females. But you also affirm that you are somehow need no more information, are an expert on the effects of sticking penises into the butts of biological males? How did you get this expertise? You seem to be the authority on male penises and male butts. I expect you're passionate in your study of phallus/anus contact. Considering you're so willing to stick your penis into a female butt, I expect you must have plenty of prior experience that founded your vast knowledge of sticking penises into male butts! Argh, not the intended recipiant, sorry Bad Faith.±Knightoftldrsig.pngKnightOfTL;DRfree guybrush threepwood! no new taxes! down with porcelain! 14:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
You blasted liberals are derailing the conversation by not following McCarthy to the next vague talking point. The real experiment should be to take straight people's babies and give them to gay guys. If America still exists in, say, a week, we can legalize gay marriage everywhere. ~ Kupochama[1][2] 14:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Troll--ADtalkModerator 14:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that, that should give Copperhead a good solid message. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Nah, forcefeeding someone is so fun. Want more sugar pie? CopperheadHisssssss 14:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Back on Track

Now that the above sillyness is out of our system, lets have a real debate.

Homosexuality is one abberation that we seem to tolerate because of excessive political correctness. What about others? Drug abuse is rampant and is part and parcel of a young person growing up these days. This forces them to alienate themselves from their parents. When you add the ready availability of disgusting pornography, which deprecates women, we are lead to a young generation entirely enslaved by their own pleasures.

We repress our natural desires to violence and other generally accepted societal ills. Why do we not also repress our base attraction to 'free' sexuality and the experimentation with drugs? Drugs are bad, they are proven to be bad (by science) and they ruin lives. We must repress this for the good of society. Any thoughts? MarkCarthy (talk) 16:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Nobody is taking you seriously, you are lame and unoriginal. You cry to daddy when people say mean words. make an new account, try to be less obvious. Now give Uncle Coppy a kiss. CopperheadHisssssss 16:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
No offence, but you always seem to be on the internet. You should really find something more productive to do with your time. MarkCarthy (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support