Debate talk:2009 Conservapedia day awards

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Liability)
(Liability)
Line 127: Line 127:
 
::*Conservative - because he has hijacked their most popular articles, turned them in to shit and draws attention to them when ever possible.
 
::*Conservative - because he has hijacked their most popular articles, turned them in to shit and draws attention to them when ever possible.
 
::{{User:Π/Sig|}} 23:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 
::{{User:Π/Sig|}} 23:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::I just saw your original post and almost choked because {{ken}} wasn't there. I would have been tempted to nominate him four times. –[[User:SuspectedReplicant|SuspectedReplicant]]<sup>[[User_Talk:SuspectedReplicant|retire me]]</sup> 05:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:43, 4 November 2009

Archives for this talk page: <1>, (new)

Debate.JPG This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by Π.


Contents

Any last minute requests?

Polls are now open, anyone got any last minute suggestions or shall the campaigning begin? - π 00:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Still think there should be one for paranoia, but willing to let it go--Thanatos 00:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
We had Rob, Andy and Ken nominated, do you have a fourth? - π 00:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
There's obviously some covert reason for omitting paranoia - who made you leave it out Pi? I am eating Toast& honeychat 01:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Is there any way to hide the results until after you have voted- being able to see the current totals influenced my decisions. --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 01:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I can't do anything about your weak will, dictator. - π 01:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Either CP as a whole or we make a joke one, like "The man standing behind you". Or maybe Glenn Beck viewing members of CP--Thanatos 01:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I'll throw in Karajou and TK for their strange belief that every vandal is us. - π 02:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Could someone remind me why there is no Sean Hannity award for Batshit Insanity? Web 03:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
'Cause it's taken as read that the site itself gets that award. Toast& marmitechat 03:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Good point. Web 03:35, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

This one is way too late for this year, but I think we should include the "Lee Dorsey Working in a Quote Mine" award for selective quoting of people and articles. Just saying. SirChuckBLeave Death Threats Here 06:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Below here are campaigners

It may not be obvious, but this version of the talk page is for campaigning for your candidates. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Ed for Delusions of grandeur

Whilst I think Andy is fine candidate, the person with the greatest delusions of grandeur is Ed Poor. Lets consider the things he has done:

  • He boasts about his bureaucratship at Wikipedia, when he was in reality grandfathered into the position because of this tenure there.
  • He boasts about the "his" age template being highly used when it didn't even work when he had finished editing it.
  • He boasts about being a mathematics teacher, when as we all know, he can't grasp even the simplest concepts.
  • He created over 1,000 articles at Wikipedia, but most of them are now redirects.

He actual thing he is good enough at these things to boast about them, when anyone else can see he is an idiot. - π 01:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Second nomination, for crying out loud. Ken's in it, right? Because he thinks he owns the internet's opinion? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This is not a nomination, this is campaigning. - π 05:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I guess I'm a step behind the process! ħumanUser talk:Human 05:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
It is hard to mass debate on your own. - π 05:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Who...?

1. Who is FOIA?

1.1. Could we have little summaries for each nominee, so that daydreamers like me don't get too confused?

2. Will Ed Poor be recieving the ED POOR IDIOT OF THE YEAR AWARD again? You know how much he's been looking forward to it. 3. Can I put userpage links in? :-) Oh by the way...Talk 02:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

FOIA wrote cp:Alger Hiss, you have never heard of him because that is all he has ever done. Ed Poor is getting a lifetime achievement award in idiocy. - π 02:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Most of the arguments pro and con (and nominations) are in the archive, for those who are confused. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Do you want to resurrect some? - π 04:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Not sure, it might be a lot of work. It would be nice for people to see the arguments pro and con "easily". Links from page to archive sections? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Vote Ed for Bigot of the year

If only for his constant "Ah so, you speakee English? Numabah 1" attitude towards Jessica when she was still around. --PsygremlinPrata! 17:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

The Cry Baby Poo-Pants Award

"The Cry Baby Poo-pants Award for Childishness" - I feel ashamed for not being the one that thought that one up. SJ Debaser 18:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate

At least one of the polls has both "Ed Poor" and "Conservative" listed. Is this intentional, like his split personalities? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 19:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Huh? They are two distinct "personalities". ħumanUser talk:Human 20:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Votes By Ace - important stuff

Ace has a problem wherein his work PC is as high tec as an abacus meaning the little votey tags don't work for me so please take my votes into account here.

  • Bigotry - JPatt
  • Delusion of granduer - Aschlafly
  • Idiocy - Colbert Vandals
  • Inaesthetic - Conservative
  • Liar - TK
  • Paranoia - RobSmith
  • Power crazed - TK
  • Puerility - Jinx
  • Monomania - FOIA

Please to add for me or take into account. Thanks! AceMcWicked 20:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Okay, my techn00b neighbours voted for you. - π 14:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Misogyny

Another award that fell sort in candidates but no interest. It had Ed Poor, Aschlafly and JPatt nominated. A fourth? - π 22:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Maybe Jinx? He had a long, turgid essay on his blog about how women need to submit. Kind of a weak submission, but if ya needs a fourth. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 00:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Jinx would be good, Andy will probably romp home though. The big problem is that none will realise what misogynists they are, using the bible as their crutch. - π 01:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

How the hell is FOIA winning?

Bert is a much greater monomaniac. Here is every article he has created or subverted to be about KAL 007:

I have highlighted the one that most demonstrates his monomania. Jess Helms dies so he write at tribute to him, that is weird enough, but it is all about how Helms was tangentially involved with KAL 007. - π 11:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I concur, Bert has demonstrated his monomania far more than FOIA. Toast& marmitechat 12:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
The difference is that FOIA makes a million small edits that crowd the Recent Changes pages, which makes him look more obsessed than Bert. Tetronian you're clueless 13:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
That is the thing they are minor. Bert writes whole articles on floating shoes and not Ed stubs either. - π 23:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Donde esta Joaquin

Only just got here so sorry if this has been covered already, but I think Joaquin should be nominated for the 'inaesthetic' award. He just scatters irrelevant pictures everywhere.-- Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 11:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Too right he should be. - π 11:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Now he has just over two weeks to close that 50 point gap with Ken. Come on Joaquín. - π 12:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah! Come on Joaquin!-- Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 12:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
No way. No one deserves to beat Ken's enlarged Hiter pics. Tetronian you're clueless 13:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Liability

I would like to have this as an award, mostly because we had such good name for it. Nominees were: Joaquin Martinez, TK and Ed Poor. A fourth? - π 23:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Actual Ken for the shit job he does on their three most viewed articles. - π 23:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
So the nominees and reasons were:
  • Joaquin Martinez - for his violation of copyright, which will get them in serious trouble one day.
  • TK - because now they have so few editors.
  • Ed Poor - because of the way he writes poor article and deletes good one.
  • Conservative - because he has hijacked their most popular articles, turned them in to shit and draws attention to them when ever possible.
- π 23:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I just saw your original post and almost choked because Ken wasn't there. I would have been tempted to nominate him four times. –SuspectedReplicantretire me 05:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support