Essay talk:Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution
m (Talk:Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution moved to Essay Talk:Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution: It's an essay, that's why) |
(I believe this is copyright infringement. RationalWiki does not have permission to copy the whole article at Conservapedia) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:Should it replace the main article that it's a /redo of? Or be a standalone essay?-'''<font color="#CC0000">α</font><font color="#A0A0A0">m</font><font color="#0099FF">ε</font><font color="#003399">σ</font>[[User_talk:AmesG| (!)]]''' 23:40, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | :Should it replace the main article that it's a /redo of? Or be a standalone essay?-'''<font color="#CC0000">α</font><font color="#A0A0A0">m</font><font color="#0099FF">ε</font><font color="#003399">σ</font>[[User_talk:AmesG| (!)]]''' 23:40, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::At first, I would say, set it up as a "standalone". Um, if it's, like, way better than some piece of crap we already have, well , replace it! (or add it) Either way, you gotta be a wiki-whore an link the hell out of it. Um, Ames, you need me to tell you this? You are hard core RW1, I don't think you need to [[be timid]]!'''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:human |<font color="#00AA00">be in</font>]]</sup>''' 23:46, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | ::At first, I would say, set it up as a "standalone". Um, if it's, like, way better than some piece of crap we already have, well , replace it! (or add it) Either way, you gotta be a wiki-whore an link the hell out of it. Um, Ames, you need me to tell you this? You are hard core RW1, I don't think you need to [[be timid]]!'''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:human |<font color="#00AA00">be in</font>]]</sup>''' 23:46, 17 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I believe this is copyright infringement. RationalWiki does not have permission to copy the whole article at Conservapedia == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I believe this is copyright infringement. RationalWiki does not have permission to copy the whole article at Conservapedia. [[User:Newton|Newton]] 19:03, 20 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:03, 21 August 2007
This soon-to-become classic of User Conservative is in need of a side by side discussion, if it even makes enough sense for it.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 01:29, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- By Baal, hes get dummmer everi days.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 01:51, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- Ok, someone has to get started on this.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 11:59, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- Ok, i did the Karajou one...if youre gonna make me do the Conservative one too, fine, but please...have mercy!--PalMD-Goatspeed! 22:32, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- Ok, someone has to get started on this.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 11:59, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
I'll do this one if you like :-). Unfortunately, I probably won't be able to most of tomorrow (law firm event after work), so if someone wants to get started, I'll kick in. Or save it for me. It's the mob's choice.-αmεσg 23:48, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- Well, this member of the mob got started. If anyone else wants to pitch in and replace my sarcastic tirades with real facts, go ahead. Sorry if I messed up the formatting. --Gulik 00:33, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
- Thank Baal for you guys!--PalMD-Goatspeed! 13:02, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
Doesn't Andy qualify as a parasitic WASP? --Kels 12:12, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
Contents |
I noticed the lack of citations for your rebuttals
I noticed the lack of citations for your "rebuttals". It seems as if you could not find scholarly support for your "rebuttals". Newton 13:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Newton
- The other side of the column has no scholarly sources either. tmtoulouse beleaguer 13:48, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
- What, "Jesus, Personal Communication" isn't GOOD enough for you Darwinist scum?!?!@!! :) --Gulik 15:25, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
Editing this article.
I don't know if it's me, but I find that the formatting of this article makes it very hard to edit. Anyway, I think we should make it (even) clearer in our introduction that the article we are rebutting makes the common mistake (?) of confusing the scientific fact of the Theory of Evolution with the philosophy of Social Darwinism. One simply describes what happens in the biological world - the other is an attempt to justify various psychotic attitudes that exist in human relations. The Theory of evolution says absolutely nothing about how people or societies should behave, it makes no moral judgments or recommendations; it simply describes what happens. Social Darwinists, in looking for a moral excuse for their excesses, state that they are justified by the Theory of Evolution - they are wrong. Once that point has been understood the whole of the article becomes irrelevant.--Bob_M (talk) 11:13, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
Talk from the Redo Page (moved)
This will be a re-do of the main page article of the same title. I hope to be back on RW in force :-D -αmεσ (!) 23:34, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
- Hi, awesome work - why not move it to "Essay:blah balh blah" and link it from the main article? Oh, and it's best to use a permalink and date note on the link to the original, as it may change over time (duh). Nice to see you back and charging in headfirst! humanbe in 12:33, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
Good to be back! Law school's easier than law practice... :-). Should have more time soon.-αmεσ (!) 22:55, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
- It has more words than I can reed :) I wuz homskoolleedd. I think it's "ready for prime time", at least, in terms of moving it to the essay space. No one will ever find it here in you user space, eh? 23:32, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
- Should it replace the main article that it's a /redo of? Or be a standalone essay?-αmεσ (!) 23:40, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
- At first, I would say, set it up as a "standalone". Um, if it's, like, way better than some piece of crap we already have, well , replace it! (or add it) Either way, you gotta be a wiki-whore an link the hell out of it. Um, Ames, you need me to tell you this? You are hard core RW1, I don't think you need to be timid!humanbe in 23:46, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
I believe this is copyright infringement. RationalWiki does not have permission to copy the whole article at Conservapedia
I believe this is copyright infringement. RationalWiki does not have permission to copy the whole article at Conservapedia. Newton 19:03, 20 August 2007 (CDT)