Forum:Conservapedia uses Perelman's proof to poo poo on peer review
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
David Gerard (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::EC No harm done! My mistake, it wasn't WIGOCP, it was [[Conservapedia_Talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F#The_best_of_public_-_again|talk]] 18:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC) [[File:TerrySmall.png|alt=SusanG|text-bottom|20px|link=User:SusanG]] [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]] | :::EC No harm done! My mistake, it wasn't WIGOCP, it was [[Conservapedia_Talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F#The_best_of_public_-_again|talk]] 18:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC) [[File:TerrySmall.png|alt=SusanG|text-bottom|20px|link=User:SusanG]] [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yeah, 'cos liberals never go near [[arXiv]]. OTOH, Andy would be a great contributor to viXra - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:09, 3 July 2010
From their front page.
Note to liberals: Perelman posted his solution on the internet, eschewing peer reviewed journals.— Unsigned, by: MJMelcher / talk / contribs
- Such comments normally go on WIGOCPtalk It has been noted on WIGOCP 18:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- EC No harm done! My mistake, it wasn't WIGOCP, it was talk 18:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- EC No harm done! My mistake, it wasn't WIGOCP, it was talk 18:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, 'cos liberals never go near arXiv. OTOH, Andy would be a great contributor to viXra - David Gerard (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)