Forum:Drama dump
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Nutty Roux (Talk | contribs) (→Where Brxbrx starts a huge fight) |
ZackMartin (Talk | contribs) (→Where Brxbrx starts a huge fight) |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:I hope you aren't referring to me Maratrean. All I have done here is defend myself. But if you are accusing me of being a bully I wouldn't mind seeing some evidence of it. [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>Ace For Mod!</sup>]] 20:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | :I hope you aren't referring to me Maratrean. All I have done here is defend myself. But if you are accusing me of being a bully I wouldn't mind seeing some evidence of it. [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>Ace For Mod!</sup>]] 20:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::You are defending yourself from accusations of bullying--{{User:Brxbrx/sig}} 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | ::You are defending yourself from accusations of bullying--{{User:Brxbrx/sig}} 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::You are a bully Ace. Like your binge of vandalizing my user and talk pages with offensive pictures. You seem to have mostly lost interest in bullying me of late, though, and chosen Brxbrx to be your new victim. Maybe one day you'll tire of him as well, and find someone else to pick on. Nutty, similar story, peas of a pod. {{:User:Maratrean/sig}} 20:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 1 January 2012
Where Brxbrx starts a huge fight
- This discussion was moved here from RationalWiki talk:Moderator elections#Proposals: Release the list of voters; institute a mechanism to strike sock votes post-hoc.
Here's my take:
{{turdblossom}}
What a waste of time. Welcome to Bureaucracywiki. AceAce For Mod! 21:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you think it's a waste of time, why are you running? Why did you spam half the wiki with your campaign? -- Nx / talk 21:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- What has this to do with me running for a moderator? AceAce For Mod! 21:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The only reason we have (or appear to have) so many rules and so much bureaucracy is because of asshats like you always stirring shit. Stop being a dick, and your complaints will vanish.--"Shut up, Brx." 21:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck off Brx, your comment is not only unwarranted but it is invalid. In what world are you living in where you think anything I have done has wound up creating more rules and bureaucracy? Your comment can be safetly ignored due to its ill informed content and accusatory tone. AceAce For Mod! 21:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The real world, where you're held accountable for your actions. Starting with the innocuous, your resignation led to having to figure out how to elect your replacement. Fairly harmless. But then, it's your constant vandalism and trolling that led to people trying to define a clear policy so that you couldn't do that. But don't worry, it isn't just you. It's also users in your same genre (MC). If you and others didn't keep acting like a dick, there would not be a need for so many rules. Murder only became illegal when Thak the caveman hit Unga-Bunga the caveman a little too hard with a rock. Before that, there were no problems with cavemen murdering each other (if any idiot decides that this is a good jumping off point to lecture me about prehistoric anthropology or social contract theory, let me preemptively say "piss off, you're missing the point."--"Shut up, Brx." 23:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The only reason we have (or appear to have) so many rules and so much bureaucracy is because of asshats like you always stirring shit. Stop being a dick, and your complaints will vanish. You display a truly shocking inability to self-reflect here. I'm ever surprised by how disconnected from reality you are when you slither out from under your rock to carry on like this.
- it's your constant vandalism and trolling that led to people trying to define a clear policy so that you couldn't do that. How is it so easy for you to tell lies so flippantly? users in your same genre But isn't it funny that you're the only one who's caused remotely as much trouble as MC from the moment you started popping off on RW? murder murder murder Jews in Cordoba Murder? Piss off? Get off your vendetta, start contributing something of value, or piss off back to ED where you can continue expanding the article on "niggers" and avoid thinking about what a disgusting person you are.

16:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Your
stalking ofobsession with Brxbrx is really starting to get creepy. --★uːʤɱ netlabelist 16:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Your
- The real world, where you're held accountable for your actions. Starting with the innocuous, your resignation led to having to figure out how to elect your replacement. Fairly harmless. But then, it's your constant vandalism and trolling that led to people trying to define a clear policy so that you couldn't do that. But don't worry, it isn't just you. It's also users in your same genre (MC). If you and others didn't keep acting like a dick, there would not be a need for so many rules. Murder only became illegal when Thak the caveman hit Unga-Bunga the caveman a little too hard with a rock. Before that, there were no problems with cavemen murdering each other (if any idiot decides that this is a good jumping off point to lecture me about prehistoric anthropology or social contract theory, let me preemptively say "piss off, you're missing the point."--"Shut up, Brx." 23:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck off Brx, your comment is not only unwarranted but it is invalid. In what world are you living in where you think anything I have done has wound up creating more rules and bureaucracy? Your comment can be safetly ignored due to its ill informed content and accusatory tone. AceAce For Mod! 21:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The only reason we have (or appear to have) so many rules and so much bureaucracy is because of asshats like you always stirring shit. Stop being a dick, and your complaints will vanish.--"Shut up, Brx." 21:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- What has this to do with me running for a moderator? AceAce For Mod! 21:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I fail to see how a guy who shows up to one wiki and says "I'm Brxbrx from this other wiki" is a victim of stalking when people from the latter wiki check out his work at the former. P-Foster 17:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh I'm not really phased that he did it. What creeps me out, though, is that that was an old contribution. He had to search through all my ED edits in order to find one that might possibly portray me in a bad light. Kinda weird. Anyways, I recall these few comments by Ace and Nutty. I don't think they were being serious, and just intending to freak me out, but if they were serious, then it's safe to say Nutty's going nuts (a little bit of context: I live in in the Phoenix area, which is in Maricopa county). Now, @Nutty: I've caused my fair share of trouble here, I admit. But I paid the price for it, and learned my lesson. No more abusive blocks. But Ace (and his ilk) remain unrepentant. It's Human decratting Blue that started the whole May Shitstorm. It's you and others that are constantly harassing members you don't like, by creating sock accounts with names meant to offend, by vandalizing user pages, by posting undesired images on talk pages, by popping in and insulting them (yes, I've done this in one or two instances, but I now recognize that it was unproductive and I shan't do so again), and other activities meant to irritate them/drive them away. I also find it laughable that you tell me to contribute, since I've contributed far more than you. I've contributed. I'm not the top contributor, and the quality of my contributions has been called into question, but I do in fact contribute, and I've spent a lot of time researching and writing for this site. If you don't believe me check my user page, including the works in progress section.--"Shut up, Brx." 17:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever, if nothing else these guys can both be relied on to show up in moments like this to ignore the substance of the post and make these kinds of charming and helpful posts. I't about me, not Brxbrx.

17:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever, if nothing else these guys can both be relied on to show up in moments like this to ignore the substance of the post and make these kinds of charming and helpful posts. I't about me, not Brxbrx.
- Phased that I did it? Kinda weird? You're a racist and a misogynist Brx. I noticed early on that you brought the term "faggotry" over to RW. Disgusting. There's no excuse for "it's what we do on ED." So here we've got yet another surreal Brxbrx post that actively avoids the subject. I didn't search through your posts to find something to might possibly portray you in a bad light. I got an email from someone claiming to be from ED that absolutely does portray you in the awful light of expressing your bigotry. See where you tried to make this about me but avoided addressing any of the lies you told about Ace and now that you write about disgusting bigotry on another site while professing to be all about order and tolerance here, yet causing shitloads of trouble? That's called dishonesty, Brxbrx. You are not an honest person.
- Contrary to your rosy misrepresentation, you've caused trouble, paid very few consequences except people continually telling you to lay off for more than 6 months, and continued doing everything you do that raises people's hackles but abusively block.
- Yeah you recall me and Ace fucking with you. You're barely worth taunting for the pathetic wretch you've shown yourself to be through your willingness to lie, smear, attention-monger, and then lash out at your accusers and enemies.
- Did you just claim that I create sockpuppet accounts with names meant to offend? That's yet another completely unsupportable statement made solely to smear. It's unrelated to this discussion, and it's something you could never possibly know. How is it so easy for you to make up extravagant lies like this, Brxbrx?
- You've contributed "far more" than me. Oh FFS, Brxbrx. The quality of your contributions are called into question because you write off-mission and poorly written shit and then carry on about it until people give up on even dealing with you. I will leave it to anyone who might even wonder if you're speaking truth to go look at the quality, substance, and quantity of our work.
- Your lying is getting exhausting. I don't want to have to come out and defend myself or my friends like this anymore. Nx, UHM, Brx, you guys are tedious and boring. It's always the same. If it weren't for the personal attacks I'd pretend you didn't exist and just concentrate on taking care of the business of the RWF, as infrequently as I even edit here. Can you resist the temptation to try and make conflict worse for once? Please?

16:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to ignore your vile accusations that I am a racist and a misogynist. Instead I'm going to repeat myself: if people didn't act like dicks, there wouldn't be any problems. But you and yours consistently act like dicks. You are the problem. I'm not lying here. Let me present a little bit of evidence. Now, it seems you and Ty have resolved your differences, and I did tell Ty I'd stop using him as an example, but I find myself unable to resist highlighting your malice, hatred, and savagery.
"Why? So you can do something substantive rather than run around turning footnotes into references and making shitty categorizing decisions and absurdly wikilinking parts of proper names rather than the whole thing. That's why." —Nutty Roux
"Ty's got a horde of sockpuppets and collaborators in his little cabal of truly vile pals. I'd approve of an IP check but it's the least of the problems with this kangaroo court." —Nutty Roux again
"Welcome to TyWiki! Here, let me follow you around sticking my nose in anything that will get me attention and clogging RC like an obsessive on meth." —Nutty Roux, being his usual dickish self
- Do you see the kind of monster you are? Ty had done nothing to you. To anyone, in fact. He was and remains innocent and yet you would brutally attack him. You are a cancer, Nutty Roux. A metastasized bit of RationalWiki's colon that has spread itself about causing mayhem and suffering. Start yourself a private forum where you and your friends can mutually masturbate each other to your heart's content, because this wiki is not for you.--"Shut up, Brx." 17:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, but I've pointed out exactly where you are lying here. You will continue to fail to substantiate some of the outrageous claims you've made about me. I cannot fathom what your personal life is like, Brx. I'd walk away from you shaking my head at how mindlessly disconnected from reality you are if you weren't doing this in public. You and your gutter buddy UHM have such unique views of things that there's really no point in engaging you further if you'd only keep your personal dislike of me and Ace to yourselves. Why can't you resist the temptation? I'd prefer peace but I'm not going to sit idly by when you repeatedly go after Ace or me for defending him.

20:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- For a minute there, I almost believed you. I thought, "wait, why am I saying all of these things about Nutty and his friends if they aren't true?" Then I read the above few posts where I demonstrated your vileness and why it's because of your little gangs of friends (which I've come to call the circle jerk) that there have been calls for reform in the first place. You are a bully, and it shows. --"Shut up, Brx." 20:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, but I've pointed out exactly where you are lying here. You will continue to fail to substantiate some of the outrageous claims you've made about me. I cannot fathom what your personal life is like, Brx. I'd walk away from you shaking my head at how mindlessly disconnected from reality you are if you weren't doing this in public. You and your gutter buddy UHM have such unique views of things that there's really no point in engaging you further if you'd only keep your personal dislike of me and Ace to yourselves. Why can't you resist the temptation? I'd prefer peace but I'm not going to sit idly by when you repeatedly go after Ace or me for defending him.
- It's sad to see, really. That somebody that had before at least some valid points now has to resort to attacks intirely based upon ad hominems and illusions of people having a vendetta against him personally. You've become a parody. of yourself. Just grow the fuck up and accept that there are people on this world and on this wiki that you don't like. --★uːʤɱ pirate 17:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'd frankly prefer to never hear from you again, yet you are always right there to butt in on any conflict involving me and Ace, carrying on by escalating a situation that has literally nothing to do with you unless you're defending Brxbrx, and repeatedly making bizarre personal remarks that aren't remotely warranted by anything I've said or done to you. What is one supposed to think, UHM? Ace and I are the only 2 editors you treat like this, and you've made a proper habit of it. I suggest you leave me alone and we'll have no further reason to ever address each other again.

20:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Frankly I have a sense of justice, and so I can't just look away while others are treated like shit by you and others. That wouldn't be any different if you were treated like shit by others (although, I guess you won't believe me that, which after all is your right not too). But here is what I can say: if you leave others alone, I will leave you alone. I don't know if you can do that, or if that peace is worth not having the pleasant sensation of beating others. If you don't believe me, you can look at your own or Ace's talk page (or anybody elses for that matter), and look how often I committed a troll-and-run post, and then look at brx's talk page too to see how often others have done it to him. I'm pretty sure I can keep not doing it, if you can stop doing it. --★uːʤɱ digital native 20:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'd frankly prefer to never hear from you again, yet you are always right there to butt in on any conflict involving me and Ace, carrying on by escalating a situation that has literally nothing to do with you unless you're defending Brxbrx, and repeatedly making bizarre personal remarks that aren't remotely warranted by anything I've said or done to you. What is one supposed to think, UHM? Ace and I are the only 2 editors you treat like this, and you've made a proper habit of it. I suggest you leave me alone and we'll have no further reason to ever address each other again.
- Do you see the kind of monster you are? Ty had done nothing to you. To anyone, in fact. He was and remains innocent and yet you would brutally attack him. You are a cancer, Nutty Roux. A metastasized bit of RationalWiki's colon that has spread itself about causing mayhem and suffering. Start yourself a private forum where you and your friends can mutually masturbate each other to your heart's content, because this wiki is not for you.--"Shut up, Brx." 17:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
If it's about ignoring the content of a post we learned from the best. --★uːʤɱ socialist 18:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pratt? God you're weird. You've apparently learned 0 from me teaching you not to make unsupported claims about me and I'm not responsible for that or your incoherent drivel.

16:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Show me evidence that Tiberius Graccius is a brx sock or shut up you pathetic hypocrite. --★uːʤɱ pervert 17:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Every troll is a sock of Brxbrx, didn't you know? Even MC is Brxbrx -- Nx / talk 18:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Brx, Nx and UHM are revolting people. Everyone here seems to have completely missed the point though, so I'll present it more clearly - I thought this current discussion about voting to be pointless and unnecessary. Brx used this as an excuse to jump in and attack me - blaming me for RW's ills and specifically the need to introduce new rules. I want to Brx to either justify this comment or shut the fuck up. AceAce For Mod! 18:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- He wrote "people like you", that means you and everybody else that acts like you. Once again you people earn an F at reading comprehension. --★uːʤɱ anti-communist 18:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- That changes nothing. My question remains unchanged. AceAce For Mod! 19:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I believe brx allready tried that (including hilariously unsuiting analogy). Now if that answer was to your satisfaction or not you might clear up with him. I can't speak for him, we didn't mind-meld. --★uːʤɱ libertarian 19:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nonsense, we all know you're actually Brx's sock. -- Nx / talk 19:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, he tried but it is completely inaccurate and has no bearing on this current discussion. Somehow a discussion on mod voting turned into an attack on me and the accusation that we wouldn't be having this discussion if I were to stop....something. This is unjustifiable. AceAce For Mod! 19:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- OH NOEZ. Whatever shall we do? (Btw Bricks was responding to your whining about too much bureaucracy and rules) -- Nx / talk 19:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- "unjustifiable" — really? So you can really stand there and dismiss any further explaination of what he said, because you don't see how it could be justified? On RW, that's almost parody… --★uːʤɱ kant 20:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, he tried but it is completely inaccurate and has no bearing on this current discussion. Somehow a discussion on mod voting turned into an attack on me and the accusation that we wouldn't be having this discussion if I were to stop....something. This is unjustifiable. AceAce For Mod! 19:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nonsense, we all know you're actually Brx's sock. -- Nx / talk 19:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I believe brx allready tried that (including hilariously unsuiting analogy). Now if that answer was to your satisfaction or not you might clear up with him. I can't speak for him, we didn't mind-meld. --★uːʤɱ libertarian 19:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- That changes nothing. My question remains unchanged. AceAce For Mod! 19:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- If you think it's pointless, then why are you wasting your time commenting on it? It's not like you had anything useful to say. -- Nx / talk 18:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am not allowed to express an opinion? AceAce For Mod! 18:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- He wrote "people like you", that means you and everybody else that acts like you. Once again you people earn an F at reading comprehension. --★uːʤɱ anti-communist 18:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Brx, Nx and UHM are revolting people. Everyone here seems to have completely missed the point though, so I'll present it more clearly - I thought this current discussion about voting to be pointless and unnecessary. Brx used this as an excuse to jump in and attack me - blaming me for RW's ills and specifically the need to introduce new rules. I want to Brx to either justify this comment or shut the fuck up. AceAce For Mod! 18:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Show me evidence that Tiberius Graccius is a brx sock or shut up you pathetic hypocrite. --★uːʤɱ pervert 17:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Once again the usual suspects are acting like schoolyard bullies. Zack Martin
20:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- I hope you aren't referring to me Maratrean. All I have done here is defend myself. But if you are accusing me of being a bully I wouldn't mind seeing some evidence of it. AceAce For Mod! 20:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are defending yourself from accusations of bullying--"Shut up, Brx." 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are a bully Ace. Like your binge of vandalizing my user and talk pages with offensive pictures. You seem to have mostly lost interest in bullying me of late, though, and chosen Brxbrx to be your new victim. Maybe one day you'll tire of him as well, and find someone else to pick on. Nutty, similar story, peas of a pod. Zack Martin
20:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are a bully Ace. Like your binge of vandalizing my user and talk pages with offensive pictures. You seem to have mostly lost interest in bullying me of late, though, and chosen Brxbrx to be your new victim. Maybe one day you'll tire of him as well, and find someone else to pick on. Nutty, similar story, peas of a pod. Zack Martin
- You are defending yourself from accusations of bullying--"Shut up, Brx." 20:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)