Forum:I think there should be a rule that all Sysops must have a sense of humor.
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::A bit seriously though, "sense of [[humeur]]" is a wide field. We have a regular user here whose SOH is so deadpan it's hard for many people to spot. So he could be mistaken for a troll, and has been on occasion. I think dealing with disruptive elements is a matter of <s>building a fifty-foot atomic robot</s> experience and fine judgement. [[User:Sophie Wilder|<span style="color:#008080">'''Sophie'''</span>]][[User_talk:Sophie Wilder|<span style="color#FF9933"><sup>''Wilder''</sup></span>]] 17:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ::A bit seriously though, "sense of [[humeur]]" is a wide field. We have a regular user here whose SOH is so deadpan it's hard for many people to spot. So he could be mistaken for a troll, and has been on occasion. I think dealing with disruptive elements is a matter of <s>building a fifty-foot atomic robot</s> experience and fine judgement. [[User:Sophie Wilder|<span style="color:#008080">'''Sophie'''</span>]][[User_talk:Sophie Wilder|<span style="color#FF9933"><sup>''Wilder''</sup></span>]] 17:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::There's also the problem of editors using humour as a justification for truly awful contributions to articles, then responding with "you have no sense of humour" when others want to revert or delete them. I don't think "people with no sense of humour" actually exist; it's just an accusation people use when they really mean "you don't find the same things funny as me". {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 17:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | :::There's also the problem of editors using humour as a justification for truly awful contributions to articles, then responding with "you have no sense of humour" when others want to revert or delete them. I don't think "people with no sense of humour" actually exist; it's just an accusation people use when they really mean "you don't find the same things funny as me". {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 17:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :You're right. Am I allowed to say AceMcwicked has an unfunny sense of humor? He may be a good example actually, of why you are right. Oh. I just realized what I am doing may be mistaken for concern trolling. Sorry. | ||
| + | --[[User:At|At]] ([[User talk:At|talk]]) 18:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:05, 5 May 2013
- Well I was thinking, and I remembered that there is funny telling and unfunny trolling. Funny trolling is tolerated, and unfunny trolling is sent to the vandal bin. Now, if there was a sysop with no sense of humor ALL trolling would be unfunny to them, thus possibly breaking the rule to tolerated funny trolling. Is this already a rule? Please post your opinions. Also, there is a third kind of trolling that I forgot. Please tell me what it is.
--At (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
--At (talk) 16:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- A bit seriously though, "sense of humeur" is a wide field. We have a regular user here whose SOH is so deadpan it's hard for many people to spot. So he could be mistaken for a troll, and has been on occasion. I think dealing with disruptive elements is a matter of
building a fifty-foot atomic robotexperience and fine judgement. SophieWilder 17:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)- There's also the problem of editors using humour as a justification for truly awful contributions to articles, then responding with "you have no sense of humour" when others want to revert or delete them. I don't think "people with no sense of humour" actually exist; it's just an accusation people use when they really mean "you don't find the same things funny as me". Wēāŝēīōīď
Methinks it is a Weasel 17:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- There's also the problem of editors using humour as a justification for truly awful contributions to articles, then responding with "you have no sense of humour" when others want to revert or delete them. I don't think "people with no sense of humour" actually exist; it's just an accusation people use when they really mean "you don't find the same things funny as me". Wēāŝēīōīď
- A bit seriously though, "sense of humeur" is a wide field. We have a regular user here whose SOH is so deadpan it's hard for many people to spot. So he could be mistaken for a troll, and has been on occasion. I think dealing with disruptive elements is a matter of
- You're right. Am I allowed to say AceMcwicked has an unfunny sense of humor? He may be a good example actually, of why you are right. Oh. I just realized what I am doing may be mistaken for concern trolling. Sorry.