Forum:Misnomers: Category, article, both, or neither?

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Forum thread|Site-related discussion}} I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misn...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them.  I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag.
 
I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them.  I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag.
  
Thoughts on how to proceed?
+
Thoughts on how to proceed?{{unsigned|Super Saiyan Musashi}}
 +
:A category would be nice, but I see no need for a full article.  The text you've already written seems like it's all that we could really say about misnomers, and it would be fine as the text of a category page.  {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:05, 17 March 2014

I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag.

Thoughts on how to proceed?— Unsigned, by: Super Saiyan Musashi / talk / contribs

A category would be nice, but I see no need for a full article. The text you've already written seems like it's all that we could really say about misnomers, and it would be fine as the text of a category page. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support