Forum:Misnomers: Category, article, both, or neither?
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{Forum thread|Site-related discussion}} I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misn...") |
Wehpudicabok (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag. | I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag. | ||
| − | Thoughts on how to proceed? | + | Thoughts on how to proceed?{{unsigned|Super Saiyan Musashi}} |
| + | :A category would be nice, but I see no need for a full article. The text you've already written seems like it's all that we could really say about misnomers, and it would be fine as the text of a category page. {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:05, 17 March 2014
I started an article on my talk page about misnomers, seeing as many crank organizations use them. I started wondering if maybe "Misnomers" could be used as an article category tag.
Thoughts on how to proceed?— Unsigned, by: Super Saiyan Musashi / talk / contribs
- A category would be nice, but I see no need for a full article. The text you've already written seems like it's all that we could really say about misnomers, and it would be fine as the text of a category page. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)