Forum:Paranormal disappearances

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Moving from Saloon Bar)
 
m (removed link to previously deleted article)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Forum thread|RW Article discussion}}
 
{{Forum thread|RW Article discussion}}
  
Would it be feasible to create a "list of topics which while 'curious' do not meet the standards required for Rational Wiki articles" - eg Lord Lucan and the other persons mentioned on [[Famous for having vanished]]? This might avoid 'persistent creation and revision roundabouts.' 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
+
Would it be feasible to create a "list of topics which while 'curious' do not meet the standards required for Rational Wiki articles" - eg Lord Lucan and the other persons mentioned on <nowiki>[[Famous for having vanished]]</nowiki>? This might avoid 'persistent creation and revision roundabouts.' 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:That list is also off-mission. Why do we need it? {{User:Π/Sig|}} 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:That list is also off-mission. Why do we need it? {{User:Π/Sig|}} 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::Since renamed to "paranormal disappearances", which I like, and I think is ''perfectly'' on-mission, relevant and interesting. {{:User:Armondikov/sig}} 22:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::Since renamed to "paranormal disappearances", which I like, and I think is ''perfectly'' on-mission, relevant and interesting. {{:User:Armondikov/sig}} 22:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:42, 2 June 2011

Would it be feasible to create a "list of topics which while 'curious' do not meet the standards required for Rational Wiki articles" - eg Lord Lucan and the other persons mentioned on [[Famous for having vanished]]? This might avoid 'persistent creation and revision roundabouts.' 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

That list is also off-mission. Why do we need it? - π 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Since renamed to "paranormal disappearances", which I like, and I think is perfectly on-mission, relevant and interesting. Scarlet A.pngpathetic 22:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Agree with Armondikov. Acei9 22:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
We should either be able to present rational reasons for their vanishing or refute crazy claims being made to explain why they've gone? --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 00:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, nice title, lousy article, if that's what it indeed is supposed to be. As far as the first question, how about asking here on the SB before leaping? Plenty of people will help you figure out if something is worth writing. Oh, and PS, writing a good article on a topic goes a long way to showing why it belongs on RW. Stubs and "work for other people" don't come across as well. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
We need to stick a subforum on the new forum for "mission discussion" or whatever you want to call it. This sort of thing can then be handled there. Keeps it separate, keeps it organised. Scarlet A.pngpathetic 16:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
That's a good idea. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support