Forum:Search engine hits
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Armondikov (Talk | contribs) |
Tmtoulouse (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
::Not just google but yah searches. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] ([[User talk:Tmtoulouse|talk]]) 16:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | ::Not just google but yah searches. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] ([[User talk:Tmtoulouse|talk]]) 16:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::So who the ''hell'' is searching "5 utr e1 i1 e2 i2 e3 i3 e4 utr 3 which of the following is a useful feature of introns for this model?"?!?!? [[File:Adkgraffiti.png|link=User:Armondikov]][[User_Talk:Armondikov|<font color=#330033><sup>...I'll glug ''your'' rock!</sup></font>]] 16:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | :::So who the ''hell'' is searching "5 utr e1 i1 e2 i2 e3 i3 e4 utr 3 which of the following is a useful feature of introns for this model?"?!?!? [[File:Adkgraffiti.png|link=User:Armondikov]][[User_Talk:Armondikov|<font color=#330033><sup>...I'll glug ''your'' rock!</sup></font>]] 16:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::My guess is a take home biology exam? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] ([[User talk:Tmtoulouse|talk]]) 16:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:37, 5 October 2011
I try and hit up talk pages of articles that I see traffic hitting. I think it's useful and interesting, decided to pull out some common terms that we get hit for if people want to try improving some of our "first impression" articles.
- poe's law
- rational wiki
- project blue beam
- desiree jennings
- to train up a child
- persecution complex
- human magnet
- giorgio tsoukalos
- thunderf00t
- venomfangx
- conservapedia
- fema camps wiki
- the amazing atheist
- aronra
- chris morris
- shockofgod
- state action doctrine
- abraham hicks scam
- no true scotsman
- types of evolution
- dennis markuze
- new world encyclopedia
- esther hicks
- natural news
- time cube
- giorgio a tsoukalos
- don't feed the trolls
- jack chick
- national sunday law
- amanda knox
- doc marquis
- internet argument
- dollar bill folding tricks
- ignaz semmelweis
- jose escamilla
- argumentum ad verecundiam
- methodological naturalism
- masturbation
- freeman on the land
- ad hoc argument
- radical feminism
- argument
- historical contingency
- 5 utr e1 i1 e2 i2 e3 i3 e4 utr 3 which of the following is a useful feature of introns for this model?
- gish gallop
- french military defeats
- rugged individualism
- rational of abortion
- falsifiability
- sloth
- gerbiling
- nephilimfree
- pinko commie
- cuius regio eius religio
- pascal s wager
- big pharma
- lee doren
- empirical reality
- mohenjo daro radiation
- pig with wings
- gender expression
- bible belt
- theta healing
- disproving evolution
- pascals wager
- political compass
- list of conspiracy theories
- willful ignorance
- pseudoscience
- wigo conservapedia
- broscience
Hope some people find it interesting. Tmtoulouse (talk) 16:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- This is just what people stick into Google, right?
...I'll exemplify your ax murderer! 16:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not just google but yah searches. Tmtoulouse (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- So who the hell is searching "5 utr e1 i1 e2 i2 e3 i3 e4 utr 3 which of the following is a useful feature of introns for this model?"?!?!?
...I'll glug your rock! 16:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- My guess is a take home biology exam? Tmtoulouse (talk) 16:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- So who the hell is searching "5 utr e1 i1 e2 i2 e3 i3 e4 utr 3 which of the following is a useful feature of introns for this model?"?!?!?
- Not just google but yah searches. Tmtoulouse (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)