Forum:What is this fallacy called?

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:[[Confirmation bias]]. {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:[[Confirmation bias]]. {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::(Or creationism.) ''[[User:Sterile|sterile]]''<sup>[[User talk:Sterile|talk]]</sup> 22:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::(Or creationism.) ''[[User:Sterile|sterile]]''<sup>[[User talk:Sterile|talk]]</sup> 22:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
[[File:Lolface.png|20px]] <span style="font-size: 20px; background: #FFFFFF;">ఠ_ఠ</span> [[User:Inquisitor Ehrenstein|Тод Зенос ан форфар фор]] 22:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:46, 9 March 2013

What is is when they go to extraordinary lengths to discredit a publication that does not support their case by grasping at irrelevant straws, yet they blindly accept publications without any sort of critical appraisal that support their case? — Unsigned, by: 58.111.190.233 / talk / contribs

Confirmation bias. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
(Or creationism.) steriletalk 22:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Lolface.png ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 22:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support