Forum:What is this fallacy called?
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[Confirmation bias]]. {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | :[[Confirmation bias]]. {{User:Weaseloid/sig|}} 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
::(Or creationism.) ''[[User:Sterile|sterile]]''<sup>[[User talk:Sterile|talk]]</sup> 22:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ::(Or creationism.) ''[[User:Sterile|sterile]]''<sup>[[User talk:Sterile|talk]]</sup> 22:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Lolface.png|20px]] <span style="font-size: 20px; background: #FFFFFF;">ఠ_ఠ</span> [[User:Inquisitor Ehrenstein|Тод Зенос ан форфар фор]] 22:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 9 March 2013
What is is when they go to extraordinary lengths to discredit a publication that does not support their case by grasping at irrelevant straws, yet they blindly accept publications without any sort of critical appraisal that support their case? — Unsigned, by: 58.111.190.233 / talk / contribs
- Confirmation bias. Wèàšèìòìď
Methinks it is a Weasel 20:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 22:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)