|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{silver}}{{religion}}
| + | Deleted due to biased content |
| − | {{cquote|Fundamentalists are to Christianity what paint-by-numbers is to art.|||Robin Tyler}}
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | '''Fundamentalism''' is a movement to recapture an ideological "purity" within a religion, that supposedly has been lost by mainstream adherents of the religion at large. Fundamentalists often assert the primacy of their own idiosyncratic interpretation of religious texts over centuries of acquired knowledge and practice. This puts them at odds not only with the secular world and members of other religions, but also with their less zealous brethren.
| + | Kentucky women hold off Delaware 69-62 |
| − | | + | BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) — Kentucky coach Matthew Mitchell has his team one victory away from the school's first Final Four. The Wildcats had to overcome an incredible effort |
| − | Though the term has been applied to anyone within any religion desiring to go back to the so-called fundamentals of the religion, the term originally applied to a more formal movement within [[Protestant]] [[Christianity]] in the 1920s that emphasized [[Biblical literalism|a literal reading of the Bible]] and a more militant approach to Christianity. The formal movement (often represented with a capital F) ended in the mid 1930s, but the ideas about literalism, inerrancy, and exceptionalism, have permeated many different [[denomination]]s within Christianity, giving rise to local churches within the larger body, who self-identify as "fundamental churches".
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fundamentalists are sometimes referred to pejoratively as "[[fundy|fundies]]."
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fundamentalist Christian groups can be [[pentecostal]] and/or otherwise pietistic (doctrinally focused on one's personal relationship with [[God]]).
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Introduction==
| + | |
| − | Fundamentalist rhetoric is frequently apocalyptic in order to provide their crusade with a driving [[theology|theological]] imperative. Typically: the secular world has become decadent and corrupt; their co-religionists have become tainted by it; and [insert deity of choice] is but a short time away from unleashing its loving Wrath (of DOOM!) upon the whole sorry mess. Only those who attain their stipulated degree of "purity" will be saved. In more extreme cases, only the 'elect', or those chosen before birth for salvation, have the opportunity for salvation, and those less fortunate, no matter how saintly, are doomed to damnation by a fickle and capricious deity.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Although such rhetoric may serve to recruit wavering co-religionists to the cause, it also serves as a natural limiting factor on how successful fundamentalist thought can be outside of these circles. Put simply, the majority of people respond very poorly to such a relentlessly negative message. That they then champion 1000+ year old texts over the explanatory width and depth of modern [[science]] leaves the widespread acceptance of fundamentalist thought utterly hamstrung. After said date of apocalyptic fury, you'd expect for there to be apologies to those who believed. Instead, however, a new date is often set. This can get boring and lead to de-conversions after the fifth time someone has given away all their worldly goods in anticipation of the apocalypse. Thus fundamentalism is often doing harm to its own cause.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==The five fundamentals of Christian fundamentalism==
| + | |
| − | {{Main|Fundamentalist Christianity}}
| + | |
| − | # [[Biblical literalism|Infallibility]] of the [[Bible]]. The fundamentalist views the Bible as a divinely inspired work authored by men acting under the direction of God, and as such is entirely error-free.
| + | |
| − | # [[Biblical literalism]]. Biblical literalism is an approach to Biblical interpretation; literalists hold that the meaning of the text is given by the plain meaning of the author(s). Only those passages which are clearly allegorical or symbolic ought to be understood as allegory or symbolism. That said, discerning which passages are clearly allegorical is exceedingly difficult.
| + | |
| − | # The [[virgin birth]] of [[Jesus Christ]]. Fundamentalists hold this against encroaching [[materialism]] which denies the [[supernatural]].
| + | |
| − | # The doctrine of substitutionary atonement. Christ inserts his own perfect record, in place of ours, into the divine retributive mechanism.
| + | |
| − | # The bodily [[resurrection]] of Jesus and the imminent personal return of Jesus Christ. This fundamental is held in opposition to those who say Jesus appeared to [[Saint Peter|Peter]] as a spirit, or that He will return only in a symbolic sense.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Jewish fundamentalism==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The term Jewish fundamentalism may refer to militant religious Zionism, or Ashkenazi or Sephardic Haredi Judaism.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Islamic fundamentalism==
| + | |
| − | [[Islam]]ic fundamentalists see [[Sharia]] (Islamic law based on the verses of the [[Qur'an]]) as the cornerstone of their faith. Their primary goal is the establishment of Sharia-governed states. Nations such as the Islamic Republic of [[Iran]] and [[Saudi Arabia]] are frequently criticized by human-rights advocates for their brutal and illiberal treatment of women, [[homosexuals]], and non-Muslims. An example: for the "crime" of having been raped, a Saudi woman could be severely beaten, perhaps to death, ''by her own family'' for bringing dishonor upon the tribe.<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/17/saudi.rape.victim/</ref><ref>http://www.iran-bulletin.org/women/RAPE.html</ref> [[Apostasy]], the renouncing of one's faith, is regarded as an insult to Allah and is also punishable by death.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===Terrorism===
| + | |
| − | Several Sharia-governed states have been accused of supporting [[terrorist]] groups. The most notorious example was the [[Taliban]] government of [[Afghanistan]], which sheltered [[Osama bin Laden]] and his [[Al-Qaeda]] terror organization, until being toppled by the [[U.S.]] government.
| + | |
| − | Others view some actions of the US government itself, such as killing people in other countries, e.g. by the use of drones, as an equivalent sort of terrorism.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Etymology==
| + | |
| − | ''Fundament'' (the foundation or basis of something) + ''al;'' Middle English (also denoting the base of a building, or the founding of a building or institution), from Old French ''fondement'', from Latin ''fundamentum'', from ''fundare'', ''"to found"''.<ref>New Oxford American Dictionary</ref> In fact, ''fundament'' shares a root with ''foundation'', thus meaning "base," "underpinning," or "support." However, it also has a connotation of "bottom," sharing the same informal meaning, which suggests an entirely different way to interpret "fundamental." Similarity to "fund a mental" is largely coincidental.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Characteristics of fundamentalists==
| + | |
| − | # Religious idealism is basis for personal and communal identity;
| + | |
| − | # Fundamentalists understand truth to be revealed and unified;
| + | |
| − | # It is intentionally scandalous (outsiders cannot understand it and will always be outsiders);
| + | |
| − | # Fundamentalists envision themselves as part of a cosmic struggle;
| + | |
| − | # They seize on historical moments and reinterpret them in light of this cosmic struggle;
| + | |
| − | # They demonize their opposition and are reactionary;
| + | |
| − | # Fundamentalists are selective in what parts of their tradition and heritage they stress;
| + | |
| − | # They are primarily led by a narrow demographic (e.g. white males);
| + | |
| − | # They envy modernist cultural hegemony and try to overturn the distribution of power;<ref>These were taken from [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/thats_some_memory_hole.php here] (post #94) based on the work of Martin Marty. A better reference would be appreciated</ref>
| + | |
| − | # Their logic is so different from normal logic, '''they cannot be argued with'''. For instance, in an argument over the existence of God, which is ''supposed'' to initially assume nothing, fundamentalists assume there is a [[god]] and that opposing statements are irrelevant.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | {{cquote|The problem not only with fundamentalist Christians but with Republicans in general is not that they act on blind faith, without thinking. The problem is that they are incorrigible doubters with an insatiable appetite for Evidence. What they get off on is not Believing, but in having their beliefs tested. That's why their conversations and their media are so completely dominated by implacable bogeymen: marrying gays, liberals, the ACLU, Sean Penn, Europeans and so on. Their faith both in God and in their political convictions is too weak to survive without an unceasing string of real and imaginary confrontations with those people -- and for those confrontations, they are constantly assembling evidence and facts to make their case.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | But here's the twist. They are not looking for facts with which to defeat opponents. They are looking for facts that ensure them an ever-expanding roster of opponents. They can be correct facts, incorrect facts, irrelevant facts, it doesn't matter. The point is not to win the argument, the point is to make sure the argument never stops. Permanent war isn't a policy imposed from above; it's an emotional imperative that rises from the bottom. In a way, it actually helps if the fact is dubious or untrue (like the Swift-boat business), because that guarantees an argument. You're arguing the particulars, where you're right, while they're arguing the underlying generalities, where they are.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Once you grasp this fact, you're a long way to understanding what the Hannitys and Limbaughs figured out long ago: These people will swallow anything you feed them, so long as it leaves them with a demon to wrestle with in their dreams.|4=Matt Taibbi<ref>[http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/6539082/bush_like_me/4]</ref>}}
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Notorious fundamentalists==
| + | |
| − | *[[George W. Bush]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Osama bin Laden]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Ayatollah Khomeni]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Fred Phelps]]
| + | |
| − | *The [[KKK]]
| + | |
| − | *Meir Kahane
| + | |
| − | *A bunch of convicts who used to be "famous", but who are now rotting either in prison or elsewhere.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Insignificant fundamentalists==
| + | |
| − | * [[Mike Huckabee]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Sarah Palin]] (scarily within reach of "significance" in 2008)
| + | |
| − | * [[Ray Comfort]]
| + | |
| − | * ''Growing Pains'' actor [[Kirk Cameron]]
| + | |
| − | * Former ''SNL'' cast member [[Victoria Jackson]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Sam Brownback]], used to be a Senator until recently, now Governor of [[Kansas]]
| + | |
| − | * Any fundamentalist [[sect]] leader with fewer than fifty adherents who hasn't (yet) successfully led them all into mass suicide. (Does [[Fred Phelps]] count?)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Religious fundamentalism and education==
| + | |
| − | One of the tenets of religious fundamentalism is how easy it is for the "pure" to be spoiled, which leads to a desire for as much of life as possible to be lived outside of mainstream society. Obviously the unrestrained contact with others of different opinions/beliefs is dangerous to the young fundamentalist, and avoiding such opportunities may be achieved by [[homeschooling]], or in whole institutions dedicated to maintaining the purity of the schooled, with the added advantage of captive audiences who are more easily indoctrinated. See [[Pensacola Christian College]] for a prime example.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == The world of fundamentalists ==
| + | |
| − | The world of fundamentalists consists of [[Snake handling|snake handlers]], [[Jehovah's Witnesses|Jehovah's Witlesses]], [[Unification Church|Moonies]], primitive rockin' back 'n forth, eyes rolled back in their heads Southern [[Baptist|Boobtists]], roll-in-the sawdust, babble-in-tongues gibbering [[Pentecostal]]s, whacked out [[television]] and [[radio]] "send us yer money Thank Yewwww Jesssssuzzzz!" crooked evangelists, weird cults in the desert, beat your kids and wives, vicious word o' the Lord Christian whackos like [[Jim Bakker]], [[Jim Jones]], [[Bob Larson]], [[Jimmy Swaggart]], [[Peter Popoff]], Reverend Ike, prosperity preachers grubbing $20 from little old ladies on Social Security, thieves, frauds and pedophiles, anti-semitic remark of the day ala [[Pat Robertson]], [[Billy Graham]], et al., white man's nation, white man's religion, white power preachers, skinheads, Klansmen, white citizen's councils with their whites-only religious schools, [[backward masking]], [[demon]]s, [[creationism]], black helicopters, commies under every bed, UN is going to invade us, militia-joining, tax-resisting, [[Harry Potter]]-fearing hysterical creeps and loonies.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Atheist fundamentalism?==
| + | |
| − | {{main|atheist fundamentalism}}
| + | |
| − | There really is no such thing, since [[Secular religions#Atheism as a religion|atheism is not a religion]] and does not have a set of tenets or doctrines. Thus the concept of "fundamentalism" cannot easily be applied to [[atheism]]. Nevertheless, terms like "atheist fundamentalist" are often used by critics of atheism to associate prominent and vocal [[atheist]]s such as [[Richard Dawkins]] with the excesses of fundamentalism.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==See also==
| + | |
| − | *[[American Taliban]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Dominionism]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Fundamentalist Christianity]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Jesusland]]
| + | |
| − | *[[Taliban]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==External links==
| + | |
| − | *[http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2004_12_05_digbysblog_archive.html#110226934277166780 All Fundamentalists Believe The Same Things]
| + | |
| − | *[http://web.archive.org/web/20080708064742/http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/fundy.html How To Think Like a Fundamentalist] (retrieved from the Internet Archive)
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.fstdt.net Fundies Say the Darndest things!]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Footnotes==
| + | |
| − | <references/>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Category:Fundamentalism| ]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:Religion]]
| + | |
Kentucky women hold off Delaware 69-62
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) — Kentucky coach Matthew Mitchell has his team one victory away from the school's first Final Four. The Wildcats had to overcome an incredible effort