Fundamentalism
m (copyedit) |
(→Insignificant fundamentalists) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
* [[Ray Comfort]] | * [[Ray Comfort]] | ||
* ''Growing Pains'' [[Kirk Cameron]] | * ''Growing Pains'' [[Kirk Cameron]] | ||
| − | * Former ''SNL | + | * Former ''SNL'' cast member Victoria Jackson |
* [[Sam Brownback]], used to be a Senator until recently, now Governor of [[Kansas]] | * [[Sam Brownback]], used to be a Senator until recently, now Governor of [[Kansas]] | ||
* Any fundamentalist [[sect]] leader with fewer than fifty adherents who hasn't (yet) successfully lead them all into mass suicide. (Does [[Fred Phelps]] count?) | * Any fundamentalist [[sect]] leader with fewer than fifty adherents who hasn't (yet) successfully lead them all into mass suicide. (Does [[Fred Phelps]] count?) | ||
Revision as of 07:01, 1 February 2011
| One of many articles on |
| The main players |
| Critics |
| Supporting actors |
Fundamentalism is a tendency exhibited by significant minorities within most major religions. Fundamentalists seek to recapture a supposed ideological "purity," often by reasserting the primacy of their own idiosyncratic interpretation of religious texts over centuries of acquired knowledge and practice. This puts them at odds not only with the secular world and members of other religions, but also with their less zealous brethren.
There is an actual movement among English speaking, especially American, protestant Christians whose leaders describe themselves as "fundamentalists." Founded at approximately the same historical moment as the First World War, the movement reflected the cultural disorientation of poorer, more rural, less well-educated Americans in a rapidly urbanizing America.
Fundamentalists are sometimes referred to pejoratively as "fundies" or "fundy loons".
Fundamentalist Christian groups can be pentecostal and/or otherwise pietistic (doctrinally focused on one's personal relationship with God).
Introduction
Fundamentalist rhetoric is frequently apocalyptic in order to provide their crusade with a driving theological imperative. Typically: the secular world has become decadent and corrupt; their co-religionists have become tainted by it; and [insert deity of choice] is but a short time away from unleashing its loving Wrath (of DOOM!) upon the whole sorry mess. Only those who attain their stipulated degree of "purity" will be saved. In more extreme cases, only the 'elect', or those chosen before birth for salvation, have the opportunity for salvation, and those less fortunate, no matter how saintly, are doomed to damnation by a fickle and capricious deity.
Although such rhetoric may serve to recruit wavering co-religionists to the cause, it also serves as a natural limiting factor on how successful fundamentalist thought can be outside of these circles. Put simply, the majority of people respond very poorly to such a relentlessly negative message. That they then champion 1000+ year old texts over the explanatory width and depth of modern science leaves the widespread acceptance of fundamentalist thought utterly hamstrung. After said date of apocalyptic fury, you'd expect for there to be apologies to those who believed. Instead, however, a new date is often set. This can get boring and lead to de-conversions after the fifth time someone has given away all their worldly goods in anticipation of the apocalypse. Thus fundamentalism is often doing harm to its own cause.
The five fundamentals of Christian fundamentalism
1. Inerrancy of the Bible. This leaves no latitude for viewing the various books of the Bible as what they were originally intended to be (whether it is a parable like Job or Jonah, or literature to support a community in crisis, like Daniel or Revelation). However, the parts where Christ appeared to be a filthy socialist are wrong. No doubt about it, none at all!
2. The Bible is the sole source of faith. Unless the issue is traditions like "accepting Jesus" as "personal Lord and Savior" which is not found in the Bible.
3. The virgin birth of Jesus Christ. Fundamentalists hold this against encroaching materialism which denies the supernatural.
4. The doctrine of substitutionary atonement. Christ inserts his own perfect record, in place of ours, into the divine retributive mechanism.
5. The bodily resurrection of Jesus and the imminent personal return of Jesus Christ. This fundamental is held in opposition to those who say Jesus appeared to Peter as a spirit, or that He will return only in a symbolic sense.
Islamic fundamentalism
Islamic fundamentalists see Sharia (Islamic law based on the verses of the Qur'an) as the cornerstone of their faith. Their primary goal is the establishment of Sharia-governed states. Nations such as the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia are frequently criticized by human-rights advocates for their brutal and illiberal treatment of women, homosexuals, and non-Muslims. An example: for the "crime" of having been raped, a Saudi woman could be severely beaten, perhaps to death, by her own family for bringing dishonor upon the tribe.[1][2] Apostasy, the renouncing of one's faith, is regarded as an insult to Allah and is also punishable by death.
Terrorism
Several Sharia-governed states have been accused of supporting terrorist groups. The most notorious example was the Taliban government of Afghanistan, which sheltered Osama bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda terror organization, until being toppled by the U.S. government.
Etymology
There is some debate as to the origin of the term. The two main ideas are referred to as the bottom up hypothesis and the top down hypothesis
- Bottom up: says that the term is derived from the word fundament, which is a polite word for asshole. Support for this contention is to be found amongst the rank and file fundamentalists.
- Top down: suggests that the term is derived from an amalgamation of the words fund a mental. Support for this idea is to be found in the leaders of the fundamentalist organisations and their pre-occupation with people sending them money in spite of their obvious less-than-stellar intellect.
So far the evidence for each hypothesis is equally balanced and no firm conclusion may be drawn. However, a recent idea suggests that this may be a case of convergent etymology, where the same word has been applied to different things that have over the years formed some sort of symbiotic relationship, so that the same word now applies to the almost indistinguishable amalgam of the two groups. Support for this hypothesis is found amongst the fundamentalist leaders who are also assholes, and the number of rank and file fundamentalists who have a pre-occupation with money and clear signs of a less than robust intellect.
Characteristics of fundamentalists
- Religious idealism is basis for personal and communal identity;
- Fundamentalists understand truth to be revealed and unified;
- It is intentionally scandalous (outsiders cannot understand it and will always be outsiders);
- Fundamentalists envision themselves as part of a cosmic struggle;
- They seize on historical moments and reinterpret them in light of this cosmic struggle;
- They demonize their opposition and are reactionary;
- Fundamentalists are selective in what parts of their tradition and heritage they stress;
- They are primarily led by a narrow demographic (e.g. white males);
- They envy modernist cultural hegemony and try to overturn the distribution of power.[3]
“”The problem not only with fundamentalist Christians but with Republicans in general is not that they act on blind faith, without thinking. The problem is that they are incorrigible doubters with an insatiable appetite for Evidence. What they get off on is not Believing, but in having their beliefs tested. That's why their conversations and their media are so completely dominated by implacable bogeymen: marrying gays, liberals, the ACLU, Sean Penn, Europeans and so on. Their faith both in God and in their political convictions is too weak to survive without an unceasing string of real and imaginary confrontations with those people -- and for those confrontations, they are constantly assembling evidence and facts to make their case.
|
| —Matt Taibbi, [1] |
Significant fundamentalists
- George W. Bush
- Osama bin Laden
- Ayatollah Khomeni
- Meir Kahane
- A bunch of convicts who used to be "famous".
Insignificant fundamentalists
- Mike Huckabee
- Sarah Palin (scarily within reach of "significance" as of September 2008)
- Ray Comfort
- Growing Pains Kirk Cameron
- Former SNL cast member Victoria Jackson
- Sam Brownback, used to be a Senator until recently, now Governor of Kansas
- Any fundamentalist sect leader with fewer than fifty adherents who hasn't (yet) successfully lead them all into mass suicide. (Does Fred Phelps count?)
Religious fundamentalism and education
One of the tenets of religious fundamentalism is how easy it is for the "pure" to be spoiled, which leads to a desire for as much of life as possible to be lived outside of mainstream society. Obviously the unrestrained contact with others of different opinions/beliefs is dangerous to the young fundamentalist, and avoiding such opportunities may be achieved by homeschooling, or in whole institutions dedicated to maintaining the purity of the schooled, with the added advantage of captive audiences who are more easily indoctrinated. See Pensacola Christian College for a prime example.
The world of fundamentalists
The world of fundamentalists consists of snake handlers, Jehovah's Witlesses, Moonies, primitive rockin' back 'n forth, eyes rolled back in their heads Southern Boobtists, roll-in-the sawdust, babble-in-tongues gibbering Pentecostals, whacked out television and radio "send us yer money Thank Yewwww Jesssssuzzzz!" crooked evangelists, weird cults in the desert, beat your kids and wives, vicious word o' the Lord Christian whackos like Jim Bakker, Jim Jones, Bob Larson, Jimmy Swaggart, Peter Popoff, Reverend Ike, prosperity preachers grubbing $20 from little old ladies on Social Security, thieves, frauds and pedophiles, anti-semitic remark of the day ala Pat Robertson, Billy Graham, et al., white man's nation, white man's religion, white power preachers, skinheads, Klansmen, white citizen's councils with their whites-only religious schools, backward masking, demons, creationism, black helicopters, commies under every bed, UN is going to invade us, militia-joining, tax-resisting, Harry Potter-fearing hysterical creeps and loonies.
Atheist fundamentalism?
There really is no such thing, since atheism is not a religion and does not have a set of tenets or doctrines. Thus the concept of "fundamentalism" cannot easily be applied to atheism. Nevertheless, terms like "atheist fundamentalist" are often used by critics of atheism to associate prominent and vocal atheists such as Richard Dawkins with the excesses of fundamentalism.
See also
External links
- All Fundamentalists Believe The Same Things
- How To Think Like a Fundamentalist (retrieved from the Internet Archive)
- Fundies Say the Darndest things!
Footnotes
- ↑ http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/17/saudi.rape.victim/
- ↑ http://www.iran-bulletin.org/women/RAPE.html
- ↑ These were taken from here (post #94) based on the work of Martin Marty. A better reference would be appreciated