Heritage Foundation

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(this is in the next section)
m (UnThink Tank)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==UnThink Tank==
 
==UnThink Tank==
As a think tank, HF conducts studies on socioeconomic issues.  Suspiciously, their results ''always'' support whatever they are lobbying for.  Hmm...  In my favorite example, the study they conducted found that poor people aren't really poor.  They then lobbied to end government support to the poor.  Isn't that funny?  They also pushed lackadaisical policies about Iraq, stating that only 40,000 troops would be needed take over and maintain order in Iraq, the war would be over in a couple years ''at most'', and the Iraqis would be greet us in with open arms (which proved true, but not in quite the way it was intended), and the Iraqis wanted democracy.  Apparently, they pull these studies out of their ass.
+
As a think tank, Heritage Foundation conducts studies on socioeconomic issues.  Suspiciously, their results ''always'' support whatever they are lobbying for.  Hmm...  In my favorite example, the study they conducted found that poor people aren't really poor.  They then lobbied to end government support to the poor.  Isn't that funny?  They also pushed lackadaisical policies about Iraq, stating that only 40,000 troops would be needed to take over and maintain order in Iraq, the war would be over in a couple years ''at most'', and the Iraqis would be greet us in with open arms (which proved true, but not in quite the way it was intended), and the Iraqis wanted democracy.  Apparently, they pull these studies out of their ass.
  
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Politics]]

Revision as of 04:42, 30 December 2007

The Heritage Foundation is a neoconservative think-tank. They advocate economic deregulation and an interventionist foreign policy. It publishes the quarterly Policy Review, for many years considered the preeminent conservative publication in Washington, D.C.. Like all conservative think tanks, it is full of unbelievable amounts of hot air, as evidenced in this quote, which also serves as a window into the corrupt quixotic soul of the organization.

Liberation is at hand.... A paradigm-shattering revolution has just taken place... ...This revolution has been so sudden and sweeping that few in Washington have yet grasped its full meaning... ...the... entire human outlook... will change... Once this shift takes place... we will be able to advance a true Hayekian agenda, including... radical spending cuts, the end of the public school monopoly, a free market health-care system, and the elimination of the family-destroying welfare dole. Unlike 1944, history is now on the side of freedom.
—former Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey, in a 1994 issue of Policy Review
Amazing! And is Jesus rising from the dead, too?

History

Like all conservative think tanks, the Heritage Foundation was founded by proxy organizations for large corporations. It cut its teeth during the Reagan administration in the 1980s, when it lobbied Reagan to take a hard-line stance against the Soviet Union (specifically, the "evil empire" quote), jeopardizing international relations in the process. It contributed heavily to the ideals embodied in the Republicans' 1994 Contract with America. Later, the foundation became a major proponent of the unprovoked US invasion of Iraq. Its reputation has been only slightly tarnished by the fact that all of their predictions proved wrong.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the Heritage Foundation sought to turn the reconstruction efforts in New Orleans into a test bed for all its harebrained conservative ideas: suspension of all government welfare, distribution of school vouchers, and the repealing of all environmental and land use regulations in the New Orleans area.

UnThink Tank

As a think tank, Heritage Foundation conducts studies on socioeconomic issues. Suspiciously, their results always support whatever they are lobbying for. Hmm... In my favorite example, the study they conducted found that poor people aren't really poor. They then lobbied to end government support to the poor. Isn't that funny? They also pushed lackadaisical policies about Iraq, stating that only 40,000 troops would be needed to take over and maintain order in Iraq, the war would be over in a couple years at most, and the Iraqis would be greet us in with open arms (which proved true, but not in quite the way it was intended), and the Iraqis wanted democracy. Apparently, they pull these studies out of their ass.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support