Pseudolinguistics
(→Clear examples) |
m (→Clear examples) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Theories about any given (known) language being the original language of mankind. (See also Lemuria above) Although humanity may have had an original language, it would have evolved beyond all recognition over thouands of years. | * Theories about any given (known) language being the original language of mankind. (See also Lemuria above) Although humanity may have had an original language, it would have evolved beyond all recognition over thouands of years. | ||
** Any theory involving [[ancient astronauts]] which claims aliens taught us writing or that dead languages such as Egyptian are in fact descended from alien tongues. (Note: aliens have in all likelihood never visited Earth for much the same reasons that we have not visited them, and if they did, it is highly unlikely their languages would be pronounceable by humans. Think Chewbacca.) | ** Any theory involving [[ancient astronauts]] which claims aliens taught us writing or that dead languages such as Egyptian are in fact descended from alien tongues. (Note: aliens have in all likelihood never visited Earth for much the same reasons that we have not visited them, and if they did, it is highly unlikely their languages would be pronounceable by humans. Think Chewbacca.) | ||
| − | ** Any form of Goropianism<ref> | + | ** Any form of Goropianism<ref>[[wikt:goropianism|Goropianism]]</ref>; theories that [[Sanskrit]], [[Hebrew]], or some other historical attested language is the original language of mankind and all others are derived from them. |
** The Sun Language Theory, claiming that language was invented by the Turks as a way to convert ritual blathering into a means of meaningful communication. The Sun Language Theory was promoted by the [[Turkey|Turkish]] government under [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk|Atatürk]] in the 1930s. | ** The Sun Language Theory, claiming that language was invented by the Turks as a way to convert ritual blathering into a means of meaningful communication. The Sun Language Theory was promoted by the [[Turkey|Turkish]] government under [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk|Atatürk]] in the 1930s. | ||
* Anything invoking the lost continents of [[Atlantis]], [[Mu]] or [[Lemuria]] (or indeed mythology) in any way is immediately suspect. | * Anything invoking the lost continents of [[Atlantis]], [[Mu]] or [[Lemuria]] (or indeed mythology) in any way is immediately suspect. | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 10 January 2014
| Style over substance |
| Popular pseudosciences |
| Random examples |
Pseudolinguistics is the study of language in a way that falls short of academic rigor. It is the linguistic cousin of the pseudoscientific family.
Nationalists of various stripes are especially proficient abusers of linguistics. Many like to make up family relationships between languages or language families and then claim the newly discovered kin as a part of their nation. For example, a Turkish linguist might claim that the Finno-Ugric languages are related to Turkish and that therefore the Finns are actually Turks (for some reason you'll never hear it the other way around, that my language is related to your language and therefore my people don't exist but are members of your people[1]). 'Mysterious' languages such as Basque, Ainu or any Native American language (as well as the Turkish and Finno-Ugric families for some reason) seem to be particularly popular languages in such theories. A typical pseudolinguistic language family claim will show a list of similar words with similar meanings in both languages. As the Zompist has already eloquently torn apart such claims there is no need for debunking them here.
If mixed with an unhealthy dose of religious whackery you might find pseudolinguists looking for an 'Adamic language', which was spoken by all of mankind before of the Tower of Babel. In the Middle Ages, Basque was believed by many to be the Adamic language, as it was one of the few known languages clearly not related to any other language. (The search for the Adamic languages should not be confused with the Proto-Human language theory, which is a legitimate though controversial hypothesis of all languages in the world having one origin.)
With the advent of social linguistics, woo-meisters have to explain and influence human behavior based on spurious claims regarding human language. Feel free to blame postmodernists as well if you like.
Of course, pseudolinguistics has ties with other fields such as pseudohistory and pseudoarcheology.
Contents |
Clear examples
- Theories about any given (known) language being the original language of mankind. (See also Lemuria above) Although humanity may have had an original language, it would have evolved beyond all recognition over thouands of years.
- Any theory involving ancient astronauts which claims aliens taught us writing or that dead languages such as Egyptian are in fact descended from alien tongues. (Note: aliens have in all likelihood never visited Earth for much the same reasons that we have not visited them, and if they did, it is highly unlikely their languages would be pronounceable by humans. Think Chewbacca.)
- Any form of Goropianism[2]; theories that Sanskrit, Hebrew, or some other historical attested language is the original language of mankind and all others are derived from them.
- The Sun Language Theory, claiming that language was invented by the Turks as a way to convert ritual blathering into a means of meaningful communication. The Sun Language Theory was promoted by the Turkish government under Atatürk in the 1930s.
- Anything invoking the lost continents of Atlantis, Mu or Lemuria (or indeed mythology) in any way is immediately suspect.
- The Lemurian theory, invented by Tamil author Devaneya Pavanar which claimed that Tamil (surprise!) was the mother of all languages.
- Some theories regarding the Voynich Manuscript
- Neurolinguistic programming incorporates some pseudo-linguistic claims.
- Any form of Cratylism, that is, the idea that words are not arbitrary linked to what they signify, but that each of their sounds has an inherent meaning.
- The idea that somehow, Celtic and Berber languages are related (quite popular in some circles in France).
- Some Hungarian nationalists believe that the Hungarian language is actually related to the Huns. Usually mixed with conspiracy theories (eg. "the Hapsburgs faked the linguistics, later maintained by the Jewish media"), wishful thinking, national mysticism. Usually predicated by charlatans with expensive books.
- Also many other claims to do with the Hungarian language, most notably the attempt to link it to Sumerian.
- A great deal of theories linking the Basque language to other languages. (See also Pseudoscientific language comparison.) This is particularly common with apparent linguistic isolates.
- Anything specific about extraterrestrial languages, i.e. astrolinguistics... since it's all protoscience and speculation in reality.
- Channelled languages, xenoglossy and glossolalia.
- Valery Chudinov concluded that Russians are more ancient than most civilizations by "noticing" monosyllabic Russian words enscribed on ancient artifacts, the ocean floor, the sun's surface and drying plaster.
- Any attempt to relate the Sinitic (Chinese) languages with Basque, Etruscan, Kartvelian, Nahuatl, or whatever other crap Russian pseudo-scientists can drum up.
Milder examples and borderline cases
- Weak interpretations of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (that language has an effect on how we interpret the world) are considered to be a part of legitimate linguistics. However, the original proposition of the hypothesis, and stronger interpretations (that language defines and constrains our thoughts) are considered by many linguists as pseudolinguistics today. (Modern linguistics views the thought control through language in 1984 to be impossible.)
- Some claims[3] used by proponents of international auxiliary language (such as Esperanto) can be classified as pseudolinguistics.
- Attempts to reconstruct "Proto-Human" without the comparative method. Some works of Joseph Greenberg, John Bengtson and Merritt Ruhlen arguably fall in here.
- Various theories about Pictish, which is generally considered to be P-Celtic now.
- Decipherment of various obscure scripts including Linear A from Crete in Greece or Rongorongo from Easter Island.
Pseudolinguistics on Conservapedia
This section is for people who don't like Conservapedia. Most of these links include side by side commentary.
- Conservapedia:Devolution of language, which talks about the degeneration of English.
- Conservapedia:History of the English Language includes a number of misinterpretations and SNAFUs about the English language.
- Conservapedia:Linguistic determinism, on how American English is superior, because that wiki is written in it.
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ It's egocentrism. To combat them, just ask them if they believe Germans are Iranian.
- ↑ Goropianism
- ↑ [mocked here]
| Articles on RationalWiki related to pseudo-studies | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pseudoarcheology - Pseudohistory - Pseudolaw - Pseudolinguistics - Pseudomathematics - Pseudoscience - Pseudopsychology - Pseudoscience list - Pseudoscience in advertising - Pseudoskepticism - Pseudovitamin | ||