RationalWiki:Chicken coop

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Nope)
m (Nope: format list items)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
=== Nope ===
 
=== Nope ===
 
# <s>No. Many of those who oppose him have some sort of denialism and are incapable of supporting their opposition with sound logic. See http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:LogicMaster_777#The_3_reactions--[[User:FedTruther|FedTruther]] ([[User talk:FedTruther|talk]]) 20:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)</s>
 
# <s>No. Many of those who oppose him have some sort of denialism and are incapable of supporting their opposition with sound logic. See http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:LogicMaster_777#The_3_reactions--[[User:FedTruther|FedTruther]] ([[User talk:FedTruther|talk]]) 20:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)</s>
##I have personally refuted that argument on the user's page and continue to see it as clearly false.  Also, please learn to use wikilinks.  [[User:ikanreed|ikanreed]] <sup>[[user talk:ikanreed|You probably didn't deserve that]]</sup> 20:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
+
#:I have personally refuted that argument on the user's page and continue to see it as clearly false.  Also, please learn to use wikilinks.  [[User:ikanreed|ikanreed]] <sup>[[user talk:ikanreed|You probably didn't deserve that]]</sup> 20:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
##Your account is less than three months old, yes? [[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.124|107.77.94.124]] ([[User talk:107.77.94.124|talk]]) 20:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
+
#::Your account is less than three months old, yes? [[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.124|107.77.94.124]] ([[User talk:107.77.94.124|talk]]) 20:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
##:[[RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Franchise|Relevant link]], in case FedTruther is wondering why their vote got struck. [[Special:Contributions/141.134.75.236|141.134.75.236]] ([[User talk:141.134.75.236|talk]]) 20:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
+
#:::[[RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Franchise|Relevant link]], in case FedTruther is wondering why their vote got struck. [[Special:Contributions/141.134.75.236|141.134.75.236]] ([[User talk:141.134.75.236|talk]]) 20:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  
 
=== Goat ===
 
=== Goat ===

Revision as of 20:55, 13 April 2015


This page is automatically archived by Pibot
Archives for this talk page: Archive list

Shortcuts:

The chicken coop is for the avoidance, containment and resolution of cases of Headless Chicken Mode (HCM). Despite the name, this tends to be serious business.

This page can be used for reporting cases of administrative abuse (abuse of sysop or moderator abilities such as blocking, page deletion, or user rights management), general abuse (such as trolling, wandalism, and personal attacks), and conflicts which cannot be solved through normal talk page discussion (such as longstanding edit wars or article content disputes). Please be specific and include links to any relevant discussions, page edits or logs.

Please try to resolve conflicts with other editors directly through discussion on their user talk page before reporting them at the chicken coop. If you do report an editor's behaviour here, please leave a message on their talk page to alert them to this, so that they have a chance to discuss their actions here.


All editors are welcome to comment on the cases raised here, and to try to reach a consensus on any action to be taken. If no consensus can be reached, and the HCM seems to be escalating, moderators are expected to take some action. However, any serious or permanent solution, such as removal of rights or lengthy ban, requires a community vote here according to the guidelines laid out in our Community Standards.

Contents


LogicMaster seems to be up to his pseudolegal threats again

Apparently, LM has returned to his posturing and making veiled legal threats and WatcherIntheDark has dished out a block of 3.6 days. Is this a fitting punishment (also considering LM's history)? ScepticWombat (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Yup

  1. but possibly not long enuff? Scream!! (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  2. I'd have made it longer if I thought the mob would tolerate it. WatcherIntheDark (talk) 11:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  3. Crank. Brings little of value to the project. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 12:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  4. Deluded, thinks he has a "contract" with the RMF. Alec Sanderson (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
    You know, I can think of a reason or two why he might have chosen contract law for this threat instead of any other sort... (no, I am not saying he has one with the RMF) PacWalker 13:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  5. We've proven our tolerance and willingness to let others stay here - but he is abusing that welcome to vomit terrible all over TP's--Miekal 13:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  6. He can learn not everything is ideologically motivated. --Maxus (talk) 16:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  7. WP blocks for legal threats; we should, too. FuzzyDogPotato (talk/stalk) 16:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  8. Had it coming.--Madman (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)The Madman
  9. Indubitably. --Castaigne (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Nope

  1. No. Many of those who oppose him have some sort of denialism and are incapable of supporting their opposition with sound logic. See http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:LogicMaster_777#The_3_reactions--FedTruther (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
    I have personally refuted that argument on the user's page and continue to see it as clearly false. Also, please learn to use wikilinks. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
    Your account is less than three months old, yes? 107.77.94.124 (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
    Relevant link, in case FedTruther is wondering why their vote got struck. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Goat

  • For reference, my vandalism was removal of a picture of a penny that was used inconsistently with this policy, which, unlike his whining, has the actual law behind it. As for "religiously-motivated" vandalism, apparently he's pulling the "anti-my crap is Statan-worshiping evil" card.— Unsigned, by: PacWalker / talk / contribs
    Asserting that people that acknowledge the authority of a government are inherently religious was kinda his shtick from the getgo, though. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 16:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • As a purely technical/legal question, How does LM's use of the qualifier, if, affect making a legal threat? If he is indeed blocked, can that action be construed as a tacit admission his complaint has some merit? nobsI was in Bagdad when u wer swirling in yur Dads' bag. 18:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
    Nothing he says has any merit.--Miekal 18:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support