Talk:9-11 conspiracy theories

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Not biased enough)
(sigh)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
::Wow, I found someone else who uses gender-neutral pronouns. <big>[[User:Fallacy|<span style="color:green">'''''F'''''<sub>ucker</sub></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Fallacy|<span style="color:#B80935">talk to me :D</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fallacy|<span style="color:orange">see my shit</span>]]</sup></big> 01:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 
::Wow, I found someone else who uses gender-neutral pronouns. <big>[[User:Fallacy|<span style="color:green">'''''F'''''<sub>ucker</sub></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Fallacy|<span style="color:#B80935">talk to me :D</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fallacy|<span style="color:orange">see my shit</span>]]</sup></big> 01:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
  
<span style="font-family:'Comic Sans MS'">I think it's perfectly biased. Just think about it - this wiki has no second thoughts of blaming, for example, Stalin of murdering millions of people by "accident" or any other governments, but starts foaming at it's mouth at a mere mention that "Great Protectors of Democracy and Freedom" can do something like that even on a much lower scale. What was the difference between you and Conservapedia again..?</span>
+
I think it's perfectly biased. Just think about it - this wiki has no second thoughts of blaming, for example, Stalin of murdering millions of people by "accident" or any other governments, but starts foaming at it's mouth at a mere mention that "Great Protectors of Democracy and Freedom" can do something like that even on a much lower scale. What was the difference between you and Conservapedia again..? <sup>&mdash; Unsigned, by: [[User:92.49.4.203|92.49.4.203]] / [[User talk:92.49.4.203|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/92.49.4.203|contribs]] </sup>
  
 
== Pathetic ==
 
== Pathetic ==

Revision as of 16:18, 16 February 2012

I know that many of the people who know how to do this are busy whitewashing, but making the claims side-by-side seems like the best organization. I might try to figure it out eventually, so anyone who wants something funny should watch for the first wave of failures.--MountainTiger 16:54, 23 August 2007 (CDT)

Contents

Time for a re-do

I think that this page should be thoroughly expanded as currently is it somewhat incoherent. I would get to work on it but I have two 4000 word essays due in soon! check out 9/11 Myths wiki JAStewart 22:18, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Not biased enough

Why are lunacies such as creationism and conservatism treated so harshly by this wiki, while the 9/11 conspiracy theories are given what looks like a legitimate debate? We should be harsher on people who pedal this bollocks. Each of them is exactly as stupid as Andrew Schlafly. — Unsigned, by: 86.147.173.223 / talk / contribs

Not biased enough? the page takes each point and rebuts it. What did you want? Legitimate debate is the best way of undoing conspiracy theorising. Conspiracy theory theorists love supposedly unanswerable "evidence" that they present - all it needs is someone to answer it in a coherent manner, with counter-argument and evidence against their claims and rhetoric. I'd prefer that to saying "they're all wrong and stupid LOL" another reason we haven't given this page the snarky treatment is that whoever wrote it didn't want to write jokes about 3000 people dying. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

no one is right here 3000 people died and they heard the thud when they hit the ground and if u think the goverment or anyone could of made that up then u should find out if u were dropped on ur headwen u were little i know there is freedom of speech but people died do nu think they said sure ill let the government kill me even though i have family so i dont care wat u say u should shut the fuck up — Unsigned, by: 67.183.175.35 / talk / contribs

It's strange how utter failure to grasp fundamental vocabulary, grammar, writing style, cognitive consistency, context, logic, or spelling can actually enhance a person's communication skills. I'd be more bevildered if xie'd written this in something resembling educated English. --CogitoErgoRaraSum (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Wow, I found someone else who uses gender-neutral pronouns. Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 01:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I think it's perfectly biased. Just think about it - this wiki has no second thoughts of blaming, for example, Stalin of murdering millions of people by "accident" or any other governments, but starts foaming at it's mouth at a mere mention that "Great Protectors of Democracy and Freedom" can do something like that even on a much lower scale. What was the difference between you and Conservapedia again..? — Unsigned, by: 92.49.4.203 / talk / contribs

Pathetic

This entire site is a pathetic attempt to promote rational, clear headed, objective, critical thinking. — Unsigned, by: 70.102.136.132 / talk / contribs

He's right damn it! I have wasted my life. AceDrumcode 22:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
And I like how ey were able to back up that statement with actual, factual reasoning and examples instead of just tossing shit around. Oh wait..... Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 22:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Actually, it is sort of nobly pathetic to be trying as hard as we do to promote rational, clear-headed, objective critical thinking in a world that increasingly seems to be dominated by the likes of 70.102.136.132. So coming from hir, pathetic is praise. --CogitoErgoRaraSum (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Wiki leaks

The late 2010 wiki leaks stuff will no doubt corroborate all the 91/11 conspiracy theories. Actually it's strange that they didn't release that stuff first. Please note that there are elements of humour and sarcasm in the preceding message.--BobSpring is sprung! 21:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Added LIHOP and MIHOP

Added the differentiation between MIHOP and LIHOP hypotheses. I couldn't figure out where this kind of addition would go, since most of the topic is debating specific (usually MIHOP) points.— Unsigned, by: Uriel-238 / talk / contribs

Ronan Point and Fred Dibnah

There should be some mention of the Ronan Point disaster (which was undoubtedly caused by bad design).

Have the likes of Fred Dibnah been asked their opinion on the subject?

Most people would assume that 'tall buildings in city centres' would be designed so they could be ecommissioned at the end of their lifespans causing minimal damage to buildings in the neighbourhood. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Barrie Zwicker

CBC interview with Michael Enright. here's the audio link.

In Canada, Zwicker has drawn comparisons to Michael Moore with respect to his viewpoints, and his approach to documentary making. He was the first from the mainstream press to go public with his opinion that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an "inside job", when, on January 21, 2002, he stated that he wanted the media to ask the following questions:

  • Why didn't the president give any orders for 140 minutes after the first plane had been hijacked?
  • Why didn't he make a statement in the first 165 minutes after the first plane got hijacked?
  • Why did not a single American Air Force plane make a single interception during these two hours?

Civic Cat (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Ag

At the least. Maybe Au in time. Tytalk 02:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Never make a chemical elements joke in my presence again. ADK...I'll deceive your autobiography! 02:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
So... Tytalk 02:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Count me in for 'argentum at the least' also. Peter Urist for Mod! 02:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

9-11

I think we should move this page to "9-11 conspiracy theories", as slashes don't look good in MediaWiki URLs. Any objections? Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 01:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I've never really seen anyone write it as "9-11" though. Is the URL's look that important? Sam Tally-ho! 01:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Fidgetertalk to me :D|see my shit 01:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
It's fine - only the talk page is broken in that way. Peter Urist for Mod! 01:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Well, I did it. Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 02:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
¿¡Por qué?! Sam Tally-ho! 02:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Bet you a {{half stale cookie}} it will get reverted within 24 hours. It wasn't really a problem. Peter Urist for Mod! 02:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
If it doesn't matter either way, then why care if it's changed? Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 02:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Basically, because it's 9/11 and not 9-11. Also, you broke a few redirects. Peter Urist for Mod! 02:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Should be 9/11. How it looks on the page is kinda more important than how it looks in the URL. PintOfStout Talk Do you think expletives make you look intelligent? I dunno. Do you think being self righteous makes you look like a prick? 02:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Lies, blatant lies. Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 02:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
What did I say? Peter Urist for Mod! 03:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
You people and your shitty fucking slahes. HYPHENS FOREVER!!!!!!11111111oneone. Flinttalk to me :D|see my shit 03:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Would 11.9.2011 conspiracy theories be an acceptable compromise then? Peter Urist for Mod! 03:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm willing to settle for that. Fluckedtalk to me :D|see my shit 03:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Wait -- 2011? STOP TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY!!!!!!11111ONEONE. Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 03:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
My God! They're everywhere! Peter Urist for Mod! 03:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Nah. The event and ensuing conspiracy theories are almost exclusively known as 9/11. And you better watch out, Fallacy. When I'm elected president, I'm making hyphens a federal crime. If I catch one in your possession, you'll be in some deep trouble! Sam Tally-ho! 03:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hyphens, a federal-crime? Are you insane? 1/4 of all Mexicans will have part of their name criminalized! Fuckertalk to me :D|see my shit 03:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
He'll solve immigration and terrorism at a stroke! Genius! There's still time to join the GOP race, I believe. Peter Urist for Mod! 04:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support