Talk:Chemtrails
(→Reverting) |
(→Reverting) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
::::::::::::::::OK, so it is obvious RationalWiki isn't for me. No need to be a fucking dick about it. [[User:Trailer|Trailer]] ([[User talk:Trailer|talk]]) 21:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ::::::::::::::::OK, so it is obvious RationalWiki isn't for me. No need to be a fucking dick about it. [[User:Trailer|Trailer]] ([[User talk:Trailer|talk]]) 21:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::::::::: If I wanna be a dick, I'll be a dick. Ain't takin' no instructions from someone infected by chemtrail fibres! [[User:Scream!!|Scream!!]] ([[User talk:Scream!!|talk]]) 21:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ::::::::::::::::: If I wanna be a dick, I'll be a dick. Ain't takin' no instructions from someone infected by chemtrail fibres! [[User:Scream!!|Scream!!]] ([[User talk:Scream!!|talk]]) 21:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::::::::::::What a lovely piece of shit you are. You are just the type of sheep they want you to be. Good luck to you but don't crying to me when the sun has been blocked out and your close to starvation. I have a well stocked emergency larder and a 'go bag'. What have you got? A shitty attitude isn't going to get you far. [[User:Trailer|Trailer]] ([[User talk:Trailer|talk]]) 21:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 17 February 2013
Contents |
Shock Jock?
Isn't Howard Stern a shock jock? That is, doesn't that term refer to someone who makes deliberately insulting and offensive remarks just for the shock value? I listened to Art Bell off and on over the years, and I never heard him out-shock Casey Kasem. I'll remove the term, if no one objects. Jon in Iowa 12:18, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
- You seem to be quite correct... I changed the description. ħuman
12:24, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
- You're a peach. Jon in Iowa 12:26, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
What is this?
"...and the exposure of barium to the population seems logical if reports are true that Baxter Labs in the Ukraine was to release a weaponized strain of flu as Joseph Moshe claimed they would, an infection which has thus far killed thousands in the Ukraine causing the country to close its borders." Is this real or is it memorex conspiracy fodder? it needs a source. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've been looking it up and found some things on it - it's primarily a talking point in chemtrail websites. I shifted it to the "claims" section and will wait further citation from the poster or I'll find it myself and reword it all appropriately.
bomination 17:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done. It's an interesting piece of horseshit but not worth dwelling on too much. Basically it's the result of misreading what an actual piece of research has said. Barium certainly hasn't been found to be an in vivo immunosuppressant - if it was doctors would be well aware of it because of its wide and regular use as an X-Ray contrast agent.
bomination 20:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done. It's an interesting piece of horseshit but not worth dwelling on too much. Basically it's the result of misreading what an actual piece of research has said. Barium certainly hasn't been found to be an in vivo immunosuppressant - if it was doctors would be well aware of it because of its wide and regular use as an X-Ray contrast agent.
Iceland and chemtrails
Given that Iceland Volcano Unspellable has caused suspension of much air traffic across Europe (now returning piecemeal) - any comments by hotair/chemtrail spouters? Or (insert suitable pseudotechnogibberish here) the volcano is being used as a more effective way of spreading whatever (rather than merely polluting the atmosphere).
82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wasn't there a similar phenomenon in the US after 9/11? ħuman
01:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Silver?
This has just been bronzed. Anything keeping it from silver? - David Gerard (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
UK government
Not as dramatic as the BoN suggests.
"Cited" Guardian article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience
MOD report: http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/70A71F1A-831B-4618-918E-D263384DA684/0/ZincCadmiumSulphideDispersionTrials.pdf
WP on the "dangerous" chemicals sprayed on people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc_cadmium_sulfide
bomination 13:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
The German Youtube clip
The English subtitles on that clip are highly inaccurate. For example, towards the beginning the subtitles say "... manipulating our climate..." whereas the speaker clearly talks about manipulating weather radar. What is not clear from the subtitles either is that the news item is about the use of chaff by the military, not really "chemtrails" nor particularly new. RTL is a commercial broadcaster known for broadcasting low-budget films and softcore porn, not so much for accurate news reporting. --Idiot numbre 188 (talk) 10:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- There's a similar video purporting to show a Russian politician threatening to use their earthquake machines on the world. Difference is, Bertan assures me the subtitles on that one are accurate, just that he was well known for being a drunk lunatic who said that sort of thing all the time. So it seems that it's certainly not an isolated trope among conspiracy theorists to take full advantage of the language barrier by stripping videos from foreign TV of all context and presenting them as something different. It'd be interesting to track down other examples, but finding the linguists willing to check the subtitles would be slightly more difficult. ADK...I'll prove your hadron! 12:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Recently I saw a Russian video of a sun dog. Despite the fact that the leading titles described it (in Russian) as a natural phenomenon, it was rebranded as a "second sun" Nibiru/Planet X video. "Visual quote mining"? :) --ZooGuard (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It might be useful to have a list of users who could offer their language expertise to interpret some of this stuff.
ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science.
13:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It might be useful to have a list of users who could offer their language expertise to interpret some of this stuff.
- Recently I saw a Russian video of a sun dog. Despite the fact that the leading titles described it (in Russian) as a natural phenomenon, it was rebranded as a "second sun" Nibiru/Planet X video. "Visual quote mining"? :) --ZooGuard (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Black rays (Black Beams, etc)
The explanation of the phenomenon is incorrect. The shadow in "in the air"; the contrail is not in shadow. I will offer a better explanation in full later. — Unsigned, by: Ross Marsden / talk / contribs
- Anyone got any more on this? ADK...I'll wash your cob! 17:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done.
narchist 16:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Done.
We have to use this!
I'll try to do something shortly.
ħuman
02:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
In my city
In the city I live in, there is at least one "Google Chemtrails" graffiti in every district, and on some key locations you can't miss. It's fucking annoying. Like someone is forcibly shoving this idiotic nonsense into my eyes every time I take a walk, while thinking he's spreading the truth. I hate graffiti. -- DasRationalpersone (Annoy me!) 12:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Reality check here
- ARE* there chemtrails? Absolutely. The majority are, as in 99.999$ or better, CO2, HO2, a bit of CO and some pollutants. So, yes, STRICTLY speaking that is "true". With special aircraft, there *ARE* chemtrails that occurred. Consider the SR-71, various and sundry experimental aircraft/sub-orbital craft. Nefarious? Nope. SOME were or are classified. Not because they're trying to kill off the taxpayers (morons, get a GRIP, kill you off, the government has NO real funding). Just because the damned vehicles would blow up because of a lack of a special fuel to stabilize it. It doesn't mean the "vast conspiracy of the space aliens" or some other shit. It only needs to be reality, that that is classified to get some other taxpayer home after photographing that which "doesn't exist". Reality vs lunacy, folks. Oops, rather wasted here, more worthy of Wikipedia... ;) Wzrd1 (talk) 02:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- But they pump super-oxidised carbon and dihydrogen monoxide into the atmosphere and no one is doing ANYTHING to stop it!!
d hominem
00:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- But they pump super-oxidised carbon and dihydrogen monoxide into the atmosphere and no one is doing ANYTHING to stop it!!
Reverting
Why was I reverted? Do you guys know anything about Chemtrails because it doesn't seem like it! LOOK UP!! Trailer (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Been subject to any government interference lately old son? Scream!! (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- What does that have to do with anything. Look up! You can see that they are spraying. Every time they do I see fibers drifting down also. Haven't you heard of Morgallens????? You guys no nothing! Trailer (talk) 20:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Quite honestly, no. Looking it up I find it's a "delusional infestation". So? Scream!! (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) It's "Morgellons". We even have an article.--ZooGuard (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Chemtrails are real. It is a misguided attempt to cure global-warming (which itself is a lie foisted on us by the illuminati for their lizard-masters). Seriously, this isn't doubted anymore! Trailer (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tedious troll is tedious. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tedious troll is idiot
Scream!! (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Just re-reading the troll, suspect possible Poe? Scream!! (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- "Possible"; are you kidding? I guess it's true what they say about the winking smiley. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh my god you guys are loosers! I cna't believe you want even LOOK UP! and see what they are doing. Trailer (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that you really need to sound a lot weirder and post great blocks of semi-coherent text if you want people to think that you are legit. Nice try though. :-) --Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 21:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also required for verisimilitude: MORE mis-spellings, you only managed 3 in that last sentence. Scream!! (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- And all capital LETTERS and bold.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 21:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to be crazy? Trailer (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mein Gott! If you're that good without trying, imagine what a little effort could do. (Didn't mention: more exclamation marks helps!!!!!!!) Scream!! (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- OK, so it is obvious RationalWiki isn't for me. No need to be a fucking dick about it. Trailer (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- If I wanna be a dick, I'll be a dick. Ain't takin' no instructions from someone infected by chemtrail fibres! Scream!! (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- What a lovely piece of shit you are. You are just the type of sheep they want you to be. Good luck to you but don't crying to me when the sun has been blocked out and your close to starvation. I have a well stocked emergency larder and a 'go bag'. What have you got? A shitty attitude isn't going to get you far. Trailer (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- If I wanna be a dick, I'll be a dick. Ain't takin' no instructions from someone infected by chemtrail fibres! Scream!! (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- OK, so it is obvious RationalWiki isn't for me. No need to be a fucking dick about it. Trailer (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mein Gott! If you're that good without trying, imagine what a little effort could do. (Didn't mention: more exclamation marks helps!!!!!!!) Scream!! (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to be crazy? Trailer (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- And all capital LETTERS and bold.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 21:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also required for verisimilitude: MORE mis-spellings, you only managed 3 in that last sentence. Scream!! (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that you really need to sound a lot weirder and post great blocks of semi-coherent text if you want people to think that you are legit. Nice try though. :-) --Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 21:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh my god you guys are loosers! I cna't believe you want even LOOK UP! and see what they are doing. Trailer (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- "Possible"; are you kidding? I guess it's true what they say about the winking smiley. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
- Just re-reading the troll, suspect possible Poe? Scream!! (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tedious troll is idiot
- Tedious troll is tedious. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
- Chemtrails are real. It is a misguided attempt to cure global-warming (which itself is a lie foisted on us by the illuminati for their lizard-masters). Seriously, this isn't doubted anymore! Trailer (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- What does that have to do with anything. Look up! You can see that they are spraying. Every time they do I see fibers drifting down also. Haven't you heard of Morgallens????? You guys no nothing! Trailer (talk) 20:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)