Talk:Logical fallacy
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(mobocracy) |
(list -> cat?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It's a direct result of the ''mobocracy'' structure. There's nothing to stop anyone creating a category: ''" things I wanna put in this category"''. Equally thee's nothing to stop anyone deleting/reassigning it.[[User:SusanG|<font color = "0000ff">Susan</font>]][[User_talk:SusanG|<font color = "00ffff"><sup>talk to me</sup></font>]] 11:03, 6 October 2007 (EDT) | :It's a direct result of the ''mobocracy'' structure. There's nothing to stop anyone creating a category: ''" things I wanna put in this category"''. Equally thee's nothing to stop anyone deleting/reassigning it.[[User:SusanG|<font color = "0000ff">Susan</font>]][[User_talk:SusanG|<font color = "00ffff"><sup>talk to me</sup></font>]] 11:03, 6 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It's a good list though - when should a list be made a category? [[User:SusanG|<font color = "0000ff">Susan</font>]][[User_talk:SusanG|<font color = "00ffff"><sup>talk to me</sup></font>]] 12:34, 6 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 6 October 2007
This article seems to be nothing more than a list. On a slightly related note, there seems to be some overlap between the categories:Evaluating arguments, False arguments, and Assessing Pseudoscience. Also, it's unclear to me why some articles go in one category and not the other. ThunderkatzHo! 10:58, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
- It's a direct result of the mobocracy structure. There's nothing to stop anyone creating a category: " things I wanna put in this category". Equally thee's nothing to stop anyone deleting/reassigning it.Susantalk to me 11:03, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
- It's a good list though - when should a list be made a category? Susantalk to me 12:34, 6 October 2007 (EDT)