Talk:YouTube
From RationalWiki
[edit] False Flagging Section
Is it really necessary to have a section devoted to crying about people voting videos you agree with 1 star? Even if they're doing it in a way that is against the terms of service? It isn't notable, and it isn't relevant. Web 21:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I mentioned scientific and religious videos, so it's not a case of being unhappy that my personal causes are being downmarked. I'd be just as pissed if atheists automatically downmarked or flagged religious videos just because they're talking about spiderman in the sky. It's more about a demonstrable censorship issue with YouTube. Revert away if you think it's not fitting in with the article, but it seems valid to me. --Concernedresident 21:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's the most relevant part of the article... ħuman
23:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's the most relevant part of the article... ħuman
- I mentioned scientific and religious videos, so it's not a case of being unhappy that my personal causes are being downmarked. I'd be just as pissed if atheists automatically downmarked or flagged religious videos just because they're talking about spiderman in the sky. It's more about a demonstrable censorship issue with YouTube. Revert away if you think it's not fitting in with the article, but it seems valid to me. --Concernedresident 21:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Copycatting
No mention of the cat-herding video? — Unsigned, by: 212.85.6.26 / talk / contribs Oct 14 2010, sometime in the evening.