Is it a stupid idea to have another word for twelve?

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 4 June 2012 at 01:54.
The [/w/index.php?title=User:Brxbrx/Bodega&offset=20120604015450&lqt_mustshow=11603 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

I mean, who thought it'd be good to organize things according to dozens?

Supposedly, Sumerians had their number system based off of the number sixty. I asked my father about it once and he said sixty was divisible by more numbers than ten, so it did sort of make sense. But why would having more multiples be easier?

    "Shut up, Brx."23:38, 3 June 2012

    Do you mean more factors?

      Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX00:42, 4 June 2012

      That is what I meant. I think. Been a while since grade school math (although you remember and you're older than me... I are stupids)

        "Shut up, Brx."01:31, 4 June 2012
         

        The Romans. There was 12 ounces in a Roman pound and 12 pounds in a Roman stone. A carat of diamond is 1/144 Roman ounces. There was 12 lines in an inch and 12 inches in a foot. I could go on if you like. The old myth that you can't multiply in Roman numerals disappears if you know to work in 12s instead of 10s like you were taught.

          Pi 3:14 (talk)01:54, 4 June 2012
           
          Personal tools
          Namespaces

          Variants
          Actions
          Navigation
          Community
          Tools
          support