Can you have a look at this?

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18 March 2013 at 13:48.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Armondikov&offset=20130318134819&lqt_mustshow=14552 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

Some allegedly Bayesian stuff has been added to Evidence. Smells fishy to me. I've reverted it once already, but the BoN apparently returned and registered an account.

    ZooGuard (talk)13:16, 18 March 2013

    It's mostly right based on Yudkowskian rationalism, which is a fairly robust approach to thinking about hypothesis testing but unfortunately suffers from too much subjectivity when trying to assign an actual, i.e., numerical, prior probability to things. Indeed, my snarkastic view of Bayes theorem is that you just fiddle with P(B) until it gives you the answer you want.

    Overall, it's not the best wording of it, I must say. But the subject is worth including in the article on evidence. The example is okay. You expect to see Christians exist in the world if God exists and you expect to see Christians in the world if God doesn't exist but religion is a social phenomenon. The question is which is more likely as does this "evidence" actually tell you the difference.

      Scarlet A.pngmoral13:48, 18 March 2013
       
      Personal tools
      Namespaces

      Variants
      Actions
      Navigation
      Community
      Tools
      support