Thanks, some questions then
From User talk:Blue
Revision as of 24 December 2012 at 06:56.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blue&offset=20121224065659&lqt_mustshow=13959 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blue&offset=20121224065659&lqt_mustshow=13959 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.
Yeah, I was justing acquainting myself with your mission statement. I get that you are supposed to have a definitive point of view -- fair enough. I appreciate the ideal of the scientific method and of pursuing truth and evidence. And that's exactly why I take issue with some of the content on that page, which is neither honest nor evidence-backed. For instance, in the article I just edited, there's an erroneous comparison between Falun Gong (which is by all accounts peaceful, but which is badly marginalized and persecuted in China) and Aum Shinrikyo (an authoritarian, mass-murdering cult). I don't think that's a valid comparison, and it's certainly not one that I've seen any scholar make. What would you recommend?