You discovered the click and drag yet?

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 6 January 2011 at 11:42.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lumenos&offset=20110106114229&lqt_mustshow=611 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

It will definitely help with your debate maps.

    - π04:45, 4 January 2011

    He's paranoid and has disabled javascript, so he can't rearrange threads. Thank goat.

      -- Nx / talk07:19, 4 January 2011

      Oh yes, scripts is nothing to fear Nerdloins. Take it from the entity who brought WikiIndex to its knees with |337 h@x20r 5k1LL5.

        ~ Lumenos (talk)08:32, 4 January 2011
         

        See debate map. Actually I'm thinking the refactoring isn't such a good idea. Instead I copy stuff to wiki articles or note outlines. This could be done with a bunch of arguments from a talkpage, creating sections for each argument and rebuttals. That would be a sympathetic debate map but the ideal debate map involves collaborating with people you disagree with, in order to have consensus on how the arguments go.

          ~ Lumenos (talk)08:29, 4 January 2011
           

          Actually this is no good at all. There doesn't seem to be a way to view/copy all the dialog at once. Can't copy it to another wiki. Aaaaahaaa, that is why they are so eager to implement it, it is anti-competitive VENDOR LOCK IN.

            ~ Lumenos (talk)14:42, 4 January 2011

            That's the most positive thing I've heard about this rather clunky format. (Except for that fact that it just told me that it signs automatically, which is the second positive thing.) Assuming that it didn't lie to me as no sig shows in preview.

              BobSpring is sprung!15:25, 4 January 2011
               

              ACTually, this allows you to reply to any post in the thread, such as in the middle, which is something I used to do, though people would scoff and it is quite difficult to navigate the wall of text when editing. I'm not sure if it will be easier or harder to notice such a post in LQT. I guess instead of the usual edit history we get an edit history in the Contents section.

                ~ Lumenos (talk)11:24, 6 January 2011

                Well, new messages makes it easier, for one, and comments that are at the same indentation level are always in chronological order. E.g. You can't inject something between Pi's comment and my reply.

                  -- Nx / talk11:26, 6 January 2011
                   

                  Secondly, it enables what I was bitching about concerning making subpages instead of archives. If/when this is implemented on the Community Standards talkpage, those who don't like certain arguably brilliant proposals, can ignore them instead of archiving them. Now how you like your supposed technocracy? The Lorg doth adapt to anything The Man can connive to keep a brotha down!

                    ~ Lumenos (talk)11:42, 6 January 2011
                     
                    Personal tools
                    Namespaces

                    Variants
                    Actions
                    Navigation
                    Community
                    Tools
                    support