Shermer and Pigliucci debate morality.

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 28 April 2013 at 03:05.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nebuchadnezzar&offset=20130428030514&lqt_mustshow=14592 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

I think you'd enjoy this debate between Shermer and Pigliucci. I give it to Pigliucci 10 to 0.

    Having read the blog debate, I wouldn't be too surprised. Shermer's entire argument seems to rely on shifting between trivially true and non-trivially false versions of his claim and then shouting "Because science!"

      Nebuchadnezzar (talk)04:52, 24 April 2013

      Having listened to the debate twice and read the comments I must agree.

        "It seems you want science to validate your libertarian principles." Pwned, as the kids these days say.

          Nebuchadnezzar (talk)03:05, 28 April 2013
           
           
           
          Personal tools
          Namespaces

          Variants
          Actions
          Navigation
          Community
          Tools
          support