Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| User | Activity | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21:29, 23 February 2013 | Blue (Talk | contribs) | New thread created | |
| 21:30, 23 February 2013 | Rpeh (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Desist) |
| 21:31, 23 February 2013 | Bob M (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Desist) |
| 21:31, 23 February 2013 | David Gerard (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Desist) |
| 21:32, 23 February 2013 | Rpeh (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Desist) |
| 21:36, 23 February 2013 | Rpeh (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Desist) |
| 21:36, 23 February 2013 | Rpeh (Talk | contribs) | Changed subject from "Desist" to "Blue can fuck off and die" | |
| 21:42, 23 February 2013 | Bob M (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Blue can fuck off and die) |
| 21:45, 23 February 2013 | Rpeh (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Blue can fuck off and die) |
Please stop moving Roko's basilisk without discussion and blocking people for long durations. This constitutes an abuse of administrative privileges.
We do have talk pages for this kind of issue you know.
What's the point when they're inhabited by wankers who think that kind of recursively-wanking shit is relevant?
Because by using a talk page you can use your eloquence and intelligence to persuade others of the validity of your position. Admittedly this is easier for some than others.
When the users concerned are only concerned with tonguing the balls of the owner of the site, and/or his critics, there's no point debating. That's abundantly clear from the talk page as it already exists. The fixation of some users with LW is ridiculous, especially as there's something close to a 100% link between LW lovers and people criticising others for wanting to keep some kind of focus on CP.