Fuck corporate whitewashing.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SuspectedReplicant&offset=20110325173508&lqt_mustshow=1705 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.
Thanks for the mental image...
In case there was confusion, that edit summary was aimed at our resident industry apologist, not you.
I've got minor concerns about GMOs, big problems with Monsanto, but that's not really the issue here. Tweenk has single-handedly turned the site's position on nuclear power around 180° and is now doing the same on Monsanto. It's getting ridiculous.
I know, but he is occasionally useful, and I won't ban/desysop someone for ideological reasons. I'd say Loya Jirga or vote, but those never seem to accomplish anything, so let's do what we can to debate and revert.
He makes ListerX look like Noam Chomsky. I wanna go on the record and say no ban/desysop/LJ/vote is required. Just call him on all his nonsense and revert w/better evidence.
I don't think there's been a 180 degree spin. RW shouldn't have a POV to spin around like that. You want to fight it on the basis of actual evidence and reason, not claiming that someone is forcing a particular POV.
I'm going to have to disagree. He created Nuclear paranoia and that bloody awful Essay:Arguments against nuclear power (as an article, of course); unilaterally changed around the Environmentalism page, despite being reverted by more than one editor, expanded the Radioactivity and Depleted uranium pages with utterly one-sided views and done similar things on other pages. Then we have the Genetic modification and Monsanto pages also being filled up with yet more unsourced/bias-sourced apologetics. He's a one-man wrecking team.