Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

This is going to sound a little nuts

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 9 April 2012 at 18:36.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tmtoulouse&offset=20120409183632&lqt_mustshow=10769 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

But has UHM contacted you asking you to corroborate his confession? The server side implied guilt assertion is awfully vague.

Perhaps when you have the time you could take some of it to release the data?

I know UHM is innocent and I won't see him bear this cross. And no, it wasn't me either.

    "Shut up, Brx."18:29, 9 April 2012

    "server log and other evidence backs up that he is a far more likely candidate than brxbrx, matching user strings in the log file, knowledge of templates, css, etc."

      85.182.145.82 (talk)18:35, 9 April 2012

      I never knew UHM to have any sort of programming experience.

        "Shut up, Brx."18:36, 9 April 2012
         
         
        Personal tools
        Namespaces

        Variants
        Actions
        Navigation
        support
        Community
        Tools