freeman page
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tmtoulouse&offset=20130725221749&lqt_mustshow=14661 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.
the views on that page are biased and you know it. why is the section about freeman winning in court empty? i am a FMOTL and win everytime i have been to court and even had magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. i have charged TV licencing for my sevices which i have recieved the funds through a commercial lien. so tell me how it isnt biased as i was trying to say?
"[F]reeman winning in court": Nope. Show me a single instance of a FMOTL winning any court. Frivolous pseudo-law gets them sanctioned and briefly locked up for contempt of court. That's the opposite of winning "[H]ad magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.": No you haven't, but you have shown in a mere 3 sentences that you don't understand what you're blathering about. Congratulations. No judge makes his oath of office by affidavit.