freeman page

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 25 July 2013 at 23:25.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tmtoulouse&offset=20130725232528&lqt_mustshow=14662 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

the views on that page are biased and you know it. why is the section about freeman winning in court empty? i am a FMOTL and win everytime i have been to court and even had magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. i have charged TV licencing for my sevices which i have recieved the funds through a commercial lien. so tell me how it isnt biased as i was trying to say?

    90.203.107.72 (talk)22:03, 25 July 2013

    "[F]reeman winning in court": Nope. Show me a single instance of a FMOTL winning any court. Frivolous pseudo-law gets them sanctioned and briefly locked up for contempt of court. That's the opposite of winning "[H]ad magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.": No you haven't, but you have shown in a mere 3 sentences that you don't understand what you're blathering about. Congratulations. No judge makes his oath of office by affidavit.

      Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg22:17, 25 July 2013

      how can it be contempt of court when the magistrate sits alone?! (which then wouldn't actually be a conventually convened court of law so lawfully a magistrate is powerless) he is unaffected. even a direct insult to a magistrate should be brushed off by them, that is assuming he has acted diligently and with integrity which they must under their oaths.

        90.203.107.72 (talk)23:25, 25 July 2013
         
         
        Personal tools
        Namespaces

        Variants
        Actions
        Navigation
        Community
        Tools
        support