freeman page

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 25 July 2013 at 23:35.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tmtoulouse&offset=20130725233524&lqt_mustshow=14664 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

the views on that page are biased and you know it. why is the section about freeman winning in court empty? i am a FMOTL and win everytime i have been to court and even had magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. i have charged TV licencing for my sevices which i have recieved the funds through a commercial lien. so tell me how it isnt biased as i was trying to say?

    90.203.107.72 (talk)22:03, 25 July 2013

    "[F]reeman winning in court": Nope. Show me a single instance of a FMOTL winning any court. Frivolous pseudo-law gets them sanctioned and briefly locked up for contempt of court. That's the opposite of winning "[H]ad magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.": No you haven't, but you have shown in a mere 3 sentences that you don't understand what you're blathering about. Congratulations. No judge makes his oath of office by affidavit.

      Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg22:17, 25 July 2013

      how can it be contempt of court when the magistrate sits alone?! (which then wouldn't actually be a conventually convened court of law so lawfully a magistrate is powerless) he is unaffected. even a direct insult to a magistrate should be brushed off by them, that is assuming he has acted diligently and with integrity which they must under their oaths.

        90.203.107.72 (talk)23:25, 25 July 2013

        Your freeman babble isn't going to impress. Evidence, put up or shut up. I have seen all the you tube videos and every claim of success that can actually be examined (I.E. there is enough information to look it up) has shown that the freeman crank has lost and usually lost badly. It is akin to the sovereign citizen crap in the US and the tax protesters that have never won a case on the merits of their arguments.

          Tmtoulouse (talk)23:28, 25 July 2013

          I am UK so i am not sure about the US laws and how/if they differ. I am in court in 2 weeks as the policy men do not understand my right of travel so i shall let you know how it goes. btw it isnt babble because it is LAW and there is plenty of evidence that proves it.

            Mole4321 (talk)23:35, 25 July 2013
             
             
             
             
            Personal tools
            Namespaces

            Variants
            Actions
            Navigation
            Community
            Tools
            support