freeman page

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 26 July 2013 at 00:56.
The [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tmtoulouse&offset=20130726005644&lqt_mustshow=14668 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

the views on that page are biased and you know it. why is the section about freeman winning in court empty? i am a FMOTL and win everytime i have been to court and even had magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. i have charged TV licencing for my sevices which i have recieved the funds through a commercial lien. so tell me how it isnt biased as i was trying to say?

    90.203.107.72 (talk)22:03, 25 July 2013

    "[F]reeman winning in court": Nope. Show me a single instance of a FMOTL winning any court. Frivolous pseudo-law gets them sanctioned and briefly locked up for contempt of court. That's the opposite of winning "[H]ad magistrates charged for breaking their oath of office under Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.": No you haven't, but you have shown in a mere 3 sentences that you don't understand what you're blathering about. Congratulations. No judge makes his oath of office by affidavit.

      Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg22:17, 25 July 2013

      how can it be contempt of court when the magistrate sits alone?! (which then wouldn't actually be a conventually convened court of law so lawfully a magistrate is powerless) he is unaffected. even a direct insult to a magistrate should be brushed off by them, that is assuming he has acted diligently and with integrity which they must under their oaths.

        90.203.107.72 (talk)23:25, 25 July 2013

        Your freeman babble isn't going to impress. Evidence, put up or shut up. I have seen all the you tube videos and every claim of success that can actually be examined (I.E. there is enough information to look it up) has shown that the freeman crank has lost and usually lost badly. It is akin to the sovereign citizen crap in the US and the tax protesters that have never won a case on the merits of their arguments.

          Tmtoulouse (talk)23:28, 25 July 2013

          I am UK so i am not sure about the US laws and how/if they differ. I am in court in 2 weeks as the policy men do not understand my right of travel so i shall let you know how it goes. btw it isnt babble because it is LAW and there is plenty of evidence that proves it.

            Mole4321 (talk)23:35, 25 July 2013

            well guys it is is LAW with plenty of evidence time to pack it in and shut down our foolish site goodbye

              ADtalkModerator00:56, 26 July 2013
               

              Just imagine how rich you'd be if you started a law school to teach this wisdom.

                Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg23:39, 25 July 2013

                rich with promissory notes? no thanks my toilet roll has the same worth

                  Mole4321 (talk)23:41, 25 July 2013

                  Promissory notes. How cute. How did you manage to get toilet paper in the first place without "promissory notes?" I'm fairly sure Tesco doesn't barter or take notes written by cranks.

                    Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg00:53, 26 July 2013
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                    Personal tools
                    Namespaces

                    Variants
                    Actions
                    Navigation
                    Community
                    Tools
                    support