User:Rursus
(→This guy) |
(→This guy) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Northern Germanic languages allegedly use fewer word roots than English. | Northern Germanic languages allegedly use fewer word roots than English. | ||
| − | + | [[/Creationism]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
==Astrology== | ==Astrology== | ||
Revision as of 16:49, 28 August 2011
Yeah! I'm the same guy as the one at Wikipedia. I'm kind of a religious (incredibly skeptical) Lutheran Protestant (and a pain in the ass, because of my notorious skepticism). We Christians have a rule to not drink blood – it's something about vampirism (
), or too much ureic acid or something – but for pseudoscience, creationism, intelligent design and their kin, I'm willing to make an exception. Also, I'm pretty sick and tired of the pseudoscience quality of the religious articles on Wikipedia, leaving room for POVvy cotteries to block the edits of neutralizers.
I take a real delight in reading about the cranks and pseudoscientists, but claiming it to be something else than fantasy stories is not to my liking.
This guy
Am a Swede, implying that I sometimes maltreat English as if it be Swedish. Northern Germanic languages borrow less Latin, and to a larger extent than English glue words together to produce words like
- "spårvagnsförarkörkort", literally "trailwagonpilotdrivingcard", or actually tram drivers license
Northern Germanic languages allegedly use fewer word roots than English.
Astrology
- /Astrology, the WP:Astrology is unreasonably apologetic towards astrology, so I believe it is kidnapped by astrologers – a not too uncommon phenomenon on Wikipedia.
- When inventing Astrology sources, I found the following hyperskeptic toolkit Astrology and Science: Artifacts in reasoning - Hidden persuaders make astrology work. It's prob generalizable to many brands of pseudoscience.