User:TheCheat
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Scientology would be the perfect name for religious scientists, why did it have to be mucked? [[User:Markedc|Markedc]] ([[User talk:Markedc|talk]]) 12:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | Scientology would be the perfect name for religious scientists, why did it have to be mucked? [[User:Markedc|Markedc]] ([[User talk:Markedc|talk]]) 12:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you take life too seriously, your playing it wrong. [[User:Markedc|Markedc]] ([[User talk:Markedc|talk]]) 12:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:38, 9 June 2011
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
New here, been reading this wiki for a while. Best vibe of all the wikis.
I am a big fan of Wikipedia, it is a very good read when I am bored. I usually like to read wikipedia, then RW, then I head over to CP for good lulz.
For the lulz! http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2011/06/08/creation/starlight-and-time/#comment-962
I think I will put random quotes I love or make here. Needed to do something with my walls... this page is bare. Maybe I should do the same to my real house...
In science, a problem is when there is not enough data to explain a phenomenon, in religion, a problem is when the data does not conform to a predetermined solution. Markedc (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Science is never wrong, only corrected. Markedc (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Scientology would be the perfect name for religious scientists, why did it have to be mucked? Markedc (talk) 12:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
If you take life too seriously, your playing it wrong. Markedc (talk) 12:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)



