Not updated with a humorous message this week
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|WTF||0||17:28, 15 May 2011|
|Crat rights||7||15:35, 15 May 2011|
|Oh yeah?||3||08:29, 15 May 2011|
|You could continue the current HCM, or.....||0||06:10, 15 May 2011|
|Think before you Edit.||16||08:09, 14 May 2011|
|Hi||7||02:33, 14 May 2011|
|How does one manually patrol posts in LQT?||1||05:58, 12 May 2011|
|Ninja||9||14:20, 10 May 2011|
|No||1||23:55, 11 February 2011|
|Your time is going to come!!!||1||11:05, 3 February 2011|
|Appears someone changed my password||5||23:23, 29 January 2011|
|Pibot question||2||20:31, 28 January 2011|
|Go Jets!||2||15:48, 17 January 2011|
|Nomination||0||16:18, 7 January 2011|
|TK Protocol||5||12:37, 5 December 2010|
|Irrational||2||14:36, 2 December 2010|
|lqt||3||11:01, 29 November 2010|
|Bible Template.||19||22:38, 21 November 2010|
|Pi bot||5||12:28, 21 November 2010|
|Seapatrol||2||23:24, 20 November 2010|
We should do Musical Crat permanently. If you're the crat, the last thing you do before logging off for the day is to pass the torch to whoever is online at the time.
Hmmm seems reasonable, but I don't want to wake up and find the place full of crats again. Can you provide me with a list of people who are likly to be around to sysop?
It won't be full of crats - you crat someone else and then decrat yourself. They'll do the same when they go.
I'll be out most of the day today, it won't do me any good.
If I remember correctly, you are a fan of The Vandals. Well, here's a song for you.
You could take a break from it and come and help me and those wanting to avoid more needless drama celebrate International Feliday at the Saloon Bar. Your choice. Just remember that, if you choose to celebrate, you pet any rusty spotted cats on your way to the Saloon Bar. Thank you.
You are irrational.
Irrationality can be broken down into two types: "pre-rationality," which is cognition before rationality, and "post-rationality," which is cognition after rationality.
Post-rationality is the deconstruction of rational grand-narratives, arising from exploring these narratives to their rational logical conclusions. When these conclusions run contra to that which the initially constructed narrative attempted to set forth, the resulting state of mind is post-rationality. So, for example: a scientist who rationally understands that a given culture's myths may not be factually true while still representing metaphoric and archetypal truths, would be said to be post-rational if he engaged in the retelling of these myths and the playing out of the the ceremonies associated with the myths. He would be "irrational" in that he is retelling stories which he knows are not factually true and performing ceremonies which he knows do not have meaning outside of metaphor and archetype, but he is not being pre-rational (which would be simply believing the myths without any rational thought), he is being post-rational.
Why are you repeating this nonsense here? That is what the talk page of the article is for.
What just repeat the nonsense in the talk page? I like it here where you can't delete it. One day you will realise that you are only looking at a fraction of the equation and then you will laugh because an irrational artist was the one who tried to show you the rest first.
I can delete it here. I think what you meant was I should not delete it from here.
You are my favorite type of person to troll. You are far too serious, literal-minded, and eager-to-be-right to engage in rational critical thought. And I love it. So I hope you never ban me. That way, I can keep holding the mirror to you and you can keep ignoring it or pretending that it's not your reflection, and I can keep laughing at you. It's kind of like the difference between Ares and Athene, in that one is the god of war and just loves fighting for the sake of it (you), and the other is the goddess of war but only fights on the side of truth and therefore always wins (me). Do you have a girlfriend, btw? Or a wife? I would feel so sorry for her. lol. =P gawd i hope this doesn't get me banned (yo, coz honestly i am a rational person and really like reading the articles, especially the ones about conservapedia). Künstlerin (talk) 03:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Not bad. My neck is sore because I aggravated an old injury. There are annoying philosophy trolls running around spouting pre-20th century ideas like they are relevant. And some argument or other I don't care about involving the Lackadaisical Jalopies.
I have some pretty bad knees myself. The two previous topics have mated, I'm sticking clear. Good comeback, by the way.
I ask because I'm not seeing a way to do this. 05:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Not really. I think it is because I haven't been here much this year, not compared to previous.
I am not and have never been Ames, though TK was convinced I was (or possibly someone named Jared?). That was a nice bit of tangential reasoning though, worthy of any conspiracy theorist!
I thought he didn't have much time for us anymore, but he is a fan of Roman history, so when I made the Cauis/Publius connection, it kind of made some sense. What was actually worrying me was you had over lapping contribution logs with his last cleverly disguised account.
The last voting eligibility for the RW Foundation Board required only a few months and 75 edits or something, IIRC.
Being that you have openly confessed to voting with sock accounts, I wonder if you have ever had any passwords changed on any of them. I highly suspect this happened to me because on my talkpage there appeared a tricky link to logout, and when attempting to log in again, my password did not work.
I assume this is Lumenous as I have no fucking idea what you are talking about. I also think you have misremembered your password, as I suspect you have a secure one rather than one that is easy to remember, because you are a paranoid fucktard. As a paranoid fucktard you have obviously attributed to malice what is easier explain by your own incompetence. How were you so stupid as to fall for that? If you put your mouse over a link it tells you in the bar at the bottom of your browser what the link actually is. I don't give a shit other than having this opportunity to laugh at you. Get Nx to reset your password
"I assume this is Lumenous as I have no fucking idea what you are talking about."
I didn't attribute it to malice; perhaps this is excellent edumacation.
You do realize if one does not follow the "guideline" directing one to test their logout then it would take one much longer to figure out that their password won't work.
I guess if we are gonna use multiple accounts for voting they also need to have email addresses associated with them so we can get passwords reset? Or maybe Nx will try to identify us by our IP address instead? And what if ey is too busy, LANCB, or dies, and tmrwadmin is too busy, etc?
What if we go to all the effort of creating accounts that have just enough edits to be eligible, and then the Board decides to up the eligibility time by a month?
Capitalism has it's advantages, I suppose. If we don't like the way RW is run we could always go to other wikis. Would be nice to know if there is any reason to bother with multiple accounts. (And if it will ever be possible for noobs to export LQT or large numbers of other pages... [although half this question could be answered by MediaWiki experts plus testing].)
I've just started using Pibot, so I don't know much about it, but is there any problem with me manually adding something to an existing archive page?
this is the year the Jets return to the Superbowl and Sanchez powers them to glory - well, I can dream, can't I.
Just a bump to remind you of your nomination for the RationalWiki Foundation board of trustees. You can accept or reject your nomination here. On January 10th, nominations close if you have not signaled acceptance by that point it will be treated as a rejection.
Sorry, but I was under the impression that we were boycotting TK and any WIGOs of his lame trolling over there. Has that policy changed again?
Just vote them down until they go away, unfortunately some people will WIGO him any way, besides you got the picture for you blog because of it.
Curses! Busted! :) On that subject - isn't there a Greasemonkey app somewhere, that hide WIGOs below a certain value? I'm sure there used to be.
Why is there an irrational number on a rational wiki?
clicking "view whole thread" brought me here. not make sense. also, "add new topic" tab button not work. = beta feedback. ħuman 03:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
A deletion of a template which you've editted is being discussed at Template talk:Bible. Thought you might want a heads up!
It is not a new message to you, it is a new message on a page you are watching.
I am certain this is not a page I have ever set to watch. I have no idea why I'd be getting messages about it.
If you have "Add pages I edit to my watchlist" enabled, and have edited this page in the past, then that's how it got added to your watchlist.
Cause the bot server won't exist for much longer, but an alternative is setup. I haven't heard from Nx about transferring them over, are you familiar with the setup being used? I haven't paid attention to the bot server in a long time.
My brother is obsessed with a Australian television series called sea patrol. Did you watch it? An iron, yet caring fist 17:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)