User talk:141.134.75.236
(→Um...) |
(→Emotional plea: new section) |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
You don't see the problem with a comparison of laws against screwing animals to Jim Crow? ''Seriously''? [[User:King Skeleton|King Skeleton]] ([[User talk:King Skeleton|talk]]) 08:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | You don't see the problem with a comparison of laws against screwing animals to Jim Crow? ''Seriously''? [[User:King Skeleton|King Skeleton]] ([[User talk:King Skeleton|talk]]) 08:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Ah, good catch. I just read that as referring to the law not always being a reliable source of morality. [[Special:Contributions/141.134.75.236|141.134.75.236]] ([[User talk:141.134.75.236|talk]]) 10:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | :Ah, good catch. I just read that as referring to the law not always being a reliable source of morality. [[Special:Contributions/141.134.75.236|141.134.75.236]] ([[User talk:141.134.75.236|talk]]) 10:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Emotional plea == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''"Excellent voice acting."'' | ||
| + | :-- New York Tim | ||
| + | ''"Irresistible."'' | ||
| + | :--FuzzyCatPotato | ||
| + | ''"If you don't comply with FuzzyCatPotato's demands, you will be universally oppressed and hated, just like mah boy Hitler."'' | ||
| + | :--Franklin Roosvelt | ||
| + | [https://translate.google.com/#en/en/IF%20YOU%20DON'T%20MAKE%20AN%20ACCOUNT%2C%20INJURED%20ORPHANED%20BABY%20PUPPIES%20WILL%20CRY%20TEARS%20OF%20SAD My emotional plea to you.] {{:User:FuzzyCatPotato/sig}} 03:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 8 January 2015
Welcome to the wiki! Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 17:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Why don't you take out an account? It's weird to see high-effort posts from an IP. A bunch of numbers doesn't suit you.
Radioactive Misanthrope 09:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- But I like my numbers! :D 141.134.75.236 (talk) 09:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Create an account with the numbers as the account name.
"De-censoring"
I think that the proper word for that is "whitewashing", not censorship. Not that it matters much though. But I'd like to see more sources in that article. Looking at the history, it's the creation of a single user.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Whitewashing is kinda like censoring out bad stuff, but yeah, I guess whitewashing is a more accurate description in this case. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Would you like an account?
If you did, we could make you a sysop too. брэндэн (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the offer, but I'm content with the situation as it is currently. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Good edit
Thanks. Landmartian (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
pls make account
i want give rights, but you is IP. FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 21:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Aww, but I like being a bunch of numbers. I also suck at usernames. :/ 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing stopping you from having a bunch of numbers as your username. --TiaC (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, but wouldn't that be pretty sucky for a self-chosen username? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- You could have a username of all punctuation. SophieWilder
22:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds kinda interesting at first, but still pretty so-so. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- You could have a username of all punctuation. SophieWilder
- Yeah, but wouldn't that be pretty sucky for a self-chosen username? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing stopping you from having a bunch of numbers as your username. --TiaC (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
A username of "141.134.75.236" would help fight the Actual Username Hegemony and bring justice to millions of stereotyped BONs. FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 00:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- plus the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on your edits get old, when you're not clearly insane, like rob or something FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 00:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Every IP edit gets marked as a potential wiki-crime? Now that's some serious anti-number racism. >.> 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- fite the hegemony, make acct FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 01:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Wouldn't registering a username mean I'm submitting to the hegemony? ;)
- I'm also pretty sure you can't make usernames that correspond with IP addresses. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- So call yourself User:IP 141.134.75.236. Landmartian (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- That only solves the latter point though. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Number usernames fight the hegemony. DOn't question IT FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 02:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- That only solves the latter point though. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- So call yourself User:IP 141.134.75.236. Landmartian (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- fite the hegemony, make acct FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 01:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Every IP edit gets marked as a potential wiki-crime? Now that's some serious anti-number racism. >.> 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
plus usernames halp fit teh illuminaughty and kitteh hufferz FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 08:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Omfg just do it FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 15:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Protip: Telling people what to do doesn't necessarily make it more likely that they'll do the thing you want them to do. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Since 141.134.75.236 is soooper unhelpful, I think it's time to abuse my power for my personal goals FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 16:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- I fail to see how power abuse would convince me to take your suggestion to heart. You're free to give it a go, though. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ceiling cat already tried the soft sell and it didn't work. Landmartian (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- I fail to see how power abuse would convince me to take your suggestion to heart. You're free to give it a go, though. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Since 141.134.75.236 is soooper unhelpful, I think it's time to abuse my power for my personal goals FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 16:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Protip: Telling people what to do doesn't necessarily make it more likely that they'll do the thing you want them to do. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Please pardon our error
You appear to have been accidentally blocked by our edit filter system. We apologize for our bot's error, and I have taken action to correct the problem. You should have no further issues. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, no worries. Thanks for fixing the problem. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:47, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Even if you refuse to submit to my fully reasonable and in no way coercive demands to get a fokken account, I kindly ask that you never ever use ";)" again, because of my personal immediate reaction whenever I see said winky smiley face.
Why? This is why. unless you do want basically everyone on RationalWiki's penis inside you FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 03:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Now that's just silly. It's not because something can be interpreted in a sexual way that all its other meanings need to be completely banned from use out of fear for confusion. And since I'm anti-sex, that particular meaning is obviously not the one I want to convey except jokingly, perhaps. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Are you saying that you're a winky apologist? FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 03:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- this video is relevant FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 01:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't show any, uh, explicit content, right? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- ... Noooooo... FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 02:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, notice those #HeGotTheWrongImpression and #Perv hashtags? I guess your link supports my point then. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- JUST CONFORM
- TO THE NORM
- FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 03:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for assuring me that I don't conform to the norm. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, notice those #HeGotTheWrongImpression and #Perv hashtags? I guess your link supports my point then. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- ... Noooooo... FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 02:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't show any, uh, explicit content, right? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- this video is relevant FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 01:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Are you saying that you're a winky apologist? FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 03:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Um...
You don't see the problem with a comparison of laws against screwing animals to Jim Crow? Seriously? King Skeleton (talk) 08:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, good catch. I just read that as referring to the law not always being a reliable source of morality. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 10:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Emotional plea
"Excellent voice acting."
- -- New York Tim
"Irresistible."
- --FuzzyCatPotato
"If you don't comply with FuzzyCatPotato's demands, you will be universally oppressed and hated, just like mah boy Hitler."
- --Franklin Roosvelt
My emotional plea to you. FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 03:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)