User talk:AgingHippie
(→Wait, what?: not nosing in) |
(→Wait, what?) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
What did you mean about conservapedia? [[User:ikanreed|ikanreed]] <sup>[[user talk:ikanreed|You probably didn't deserve that]]</sup> 15:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | What did you mean about conservapedia? [[User:ikanreed|ikanreed]] <sup>[[user talk:ikanreed|You probably didn't deserve that]]</sup> 15:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:RW's outgrown CP. Digs no longer necessary. [[User:FuzzyCatPotato|Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ]] ([[User talk:FuzzyCatPotato|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/FuzzyCatPotato|stalk]]) 15:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | :RW's outgrown CP. Digs no longer necessary. [[User:FuzzyCatPotato|Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ]] ([[User talk:FuzzyCatPotato|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/FuzzyCatPotato|stalk]]) 15:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Sure, but they're still fun. [[User:ikanreed|ikanreed]] <sup>[[user talk:ikanreed|You probably didn't deserve that]]</sup> 15:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 27 March 2015
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>
Contents |
Know You Can't Respond
But good luck with the deadlines anyway! :D --Castaigne (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
That was public
Sir, you don't need to hide it. The link to his Facebook page is public, added by himself on his user page. If that was the only reason, please unhide it and readd my comment here.
Anyway, I hope you will listen to my concerns. Today, he was reverted again for insulting an user from Wikipedia... and he is using your pages to do it. Regards.
Game
That was some game of cricket. What did I tell you about the Black Caps. They got this...but it hasn't been easy. The South Africans were brilliant. Acei9 08:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- The magic of time zones kept me from being able to watch live, but yeah. Saw the highlights. What a match. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Stranger!
May I ask, do you believe in the concept of induction, or in patterns? That what happened in the past should be considered when it comes to determining the future?--Tanis (talk) 15:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am a historian by training. It is crucial to understand the past in order to understand the present, and understanding the past will often give us insight into how the future might unfold. That said, the differences are as important as any similarities, and "patterns" are probably imposed by the observer. "Tendencies" need to be taken seriously, but they are by no means determinative. Why do you ask? Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Wait, what?
What did you mean about conservapedia? ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- RW's outgrown CP. Digs no longer necessary. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 15:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, but they're still fun. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)