User talk:AllonY

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(If you reinsert those typos one more time)
(If you reinsert those typos one more time)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
::Heres the link http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Palestine&action=history to the record of the page and the fact that I undid edits ONCE.  Hmm, but with your power trip why do I not find your dishonesty surprising?[[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 
::Heres the link http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Palestine&action=history to the record of the page and the fact that I undid edits ONCE.  Hmm, but with your power trip why do I not find your dishonesty surprising?[[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:::[http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935472 Once.] [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935477 Twice]. [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935480 Three times]. I stand corrected. You reinserted typos three times. Still spells "troll" to me. [[User:PintOfStout|PintOfStout]]  [[User_talk:PintOfStout|Talk]] <small> Good people drink good beer.</small> 20:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:::[http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935472 Once.] [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935477 Twice]. [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Yom_Kippur&diff=next&oldid=935480 Three times]. I stand corrected. You reinserted typos three times. Still spells "troll" to me. [[User:PintOfStout|PintOfStout]]  [[User_talk:PintOfStout|Talk]] <small> Good people drink good beer.</small> 20:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
::::Gee, so now on multiple pages I made revisions LOL  Lets face facts, you are a power mad moderator who instead of just stating where the proble m was, on what page, decided to go ahead and ban someone and call them troll.  The questin is- why mot remove all my edits from there if I am such a troll?  Really, trolls don't post accurate information and you should remove everything posted by the troll.  The fact that you insisted on keeping it while I was in the process of removing it shows you did not think my posts were trolling.  Come show you are not a hypocrite and remove my posts from the "Yom Kippur" article and revert it to what it was before I started editing.  then i will believe that you thought I was a troll.  Anything less and it shows you are on a power trip, use "troll" as an insult knowing it is not true, and are on an ego trip[[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
+
::::Gee, so now on multiple pages I made revisions LOL  Lets face facts, you are a power mad moderator who instead of just stating where the problem was and on what page, decided to go ahead and ban someone and call them troll.  The question is- why not remove all my edits from there if I am such a troll?  Really, trolls don't post accurate information and you should remove everything posted by the troll.  The fact that you insisted on keeping it while I was in the process of removing it shows you did not think my posts were trolling.  Come show you are not a hypocrite and remove my posts from the "Yom Kippur" article and revert it to what it was before I started editing.  Then i will believe that you thought I was a troll.  Anything less and it shows you are on a power trip, use "troll" as an insult knowing it is not true, and are on an ego trip[[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
  
 
==Vandalize RW! Campaign==
 
==Vandalize RW! Campaign==
 
Join the global anti-stupidity movement, the Vandalize RW! Campaign! -MC <sup>&mdash; Unsigned, by: [[User:TrentsBitch|TrentsBitch]] / [[User talk:TrentsBitch|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/TrentsBitch|contribs]] </sup>
 
Join the global anti-stupidity movement, the Vandalize RW! Campaign! -MC <sup>&mdash; Unsigned, by: [[User:TrentsBitch|TrentsBitch]] / [[User talk:TrentsBitch|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/TrentsBitch|contribs]] </sup>
 
:No need to vandalise it; as it stands it has so many glaring errors and flaws that any vandalisation would only improve it!  I'll eave it as it is, and use those errors to show people how inaccurate it is.  Should make for a good laugh when needing a break from serious discussion [[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:No need to vandalise it; as it stands it has so many glaring errors and flaws that any vandalisation would only improve it!  I'll eave it as it is, and use those errors to show people how inaccurate it is.  Should make for a good laugh when needing a break from serious discussion [[User:AllonY|AllonY]] ([[User talk:AllonY|talk]]) 20:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:34, 26 December 2011

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, AllonY!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Is your name intended to be "Allon Y____," or did you just mess up "Allons-y?" Picon small.pngLiquid Blue 22:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Clearly, it's a pseudonymn for his favorite phrase, "No, y'all." *nods head sagely* Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 22:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Yes, that is my intended username. Is somebody else using the other name you mentioned?

Not sure how to reply to talks- hopefully this is it- feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

To reply to talk posts, just put a colon followed by your response. And make sure to sign your response with four tildes (~~~~), that way we know who and when the post is from. Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 22:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
As for the name thing: we were both just teasing you. At least, I was  :-) Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 22:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Heh, for a moment there I'd fallen into an ongoing war between users... Just a question though, how would I reply to that first post. I don't see anywhere to edit or enter text. Thanks AllonY (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Click the "Edit" tab in the upper right, that will open up the entire page for editing. Or go to preferences, gadgets, and check the one that says "Add an [edit] link for the lead section of a page" -- Nx / talk 22:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Many thanks. Hopefully I'll be out of the newbie phase quickly. AllonY (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Please don't mark all your contributions as "minor". This is usually intended for grammatical and similar edits. Thanks: Scream!! (talk) 13:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

If you're going to totally change the tone of the article...

...please bring it up on the talk page first. Thanks. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 14:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

So in other words a pure propaganda piece should not have facts added to it that contradict the propaganda... And here I was thinking that wiki sites were for the dissemination of information, not disinformation!
The purpose of Wiki sites like RationalWiki is for there to be a collaborative effort on an article so that no one person "owns" an article but that, rather, the article is owned and cared for by the collective. In that sense, propaganda and disinformation are filtered through the community to set the tone of the article. Getting all pissy and leaving and never coming back when someone disagrees with you and your contributions, however, is completely antithetical to the idea of a Wiki. The Punk Symphony of Noise Your mental puke relief 17:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Replacing one side's propaganda with another's isn't really productive. Also, we're not NPOV. Also, you might want to try "BUT I THOUGHT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE RATIONALWIKI." That's always a good one. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 15:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Moreover, read what I wrote in the post above. I didn't tell you to eff off, I asked you to start a dialogue about the specific points you would like to see changed so that we can come to a consensus about how to change an article that's been around for years. If that's too much for you to do... PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 15:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
ah yes, that article has been around for year and I must convince those who support it to let me remove blatant propoganda and and hatred to let me post something more reasonable... Yes, that makes sense in some bizarre universe. Clearly this is not the site for me if removing inaccurate facts and propaganda and replacing it with referenced material is a violation of the rules — Unsigned, by: AllonY / talk / contribs
Thank you for your contributions. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 15:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
A lot of the pages on the site are basically ignored by the majority of users after their principal author(s) are done with them. So the fact that an article has stayed in a certain state for some time means nothing. There are several articles that I know to be shit, or at least not-as-good as necessary, and I have been ignoring them for months due to lack of free time.--ZooGuard (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Well goodbye and enjoy your site. I'll be sure to let everyone know throat this I a propaganda website that censors any information it doesn't like. Don't worry, my blog only gets around 1000 unique hits a day, maybe not as much as here, but hey, I you're spot in 80,000 for now, once word gets out Who knows where you'll end up lol
Ah, now, that is exactly the sort of well reasoned and articulate answer that will persuade us all to change our minds. I know that your trolling even tempered edits have made me look again. Bad Faith (talk) 17:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I tried well reasoned, articulate and referenced. Seems that is considered to be altering the tone of the article and trolling. So now I will respond in the manner that is clearely what is wanted here. Its clear that minds aren't gping to be changed here and why should I waste time writing anything when it gets removed because it dares to go against the propoganda platform being driven here? Have fun and enjoy your site. I'm sure you'll pick up many people out there that don't mind censorship and being told what opinions to express so they don't "change the tone" around here. Of course the tone seems to be "inaccurate and wanting to stay that way", but hey, you seem to enjoy it AllonY (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

If you reinsert those typos one more time

...I will have to put a brake on your editing. Sorry. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 18:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

of course you will- whats censorship without dictators to make sure everybody follows the party line? Can't have nasty things like facts getting in the way of your propoganda. As I said, enjoy your site. Its very inaccuracy is the best weapon to use against it by anybody foolish enough to quote it — Unsigned, by: AllonY / talk / contribs
That's right, allowing trolls to insert typos is censorship. Also, this is the third time you've said "enjoy your site" and then come back for one more edit. Shit or get off the pot. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 18:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I type badly therefore I'm a troll LOL Really, you are pathetic- or is it trolling on tis site to post accurate information which shows your pro[oganda for what it is? It must be terrible for you to live in a world where you don't have the power to make everything agree with you. As for returning here- hey, you want to insult me, I choose if I will return or not. What I will not be doing is correcting any of your content on Jewish holidays or beliefs here- and those are so awful my son in Grade 5 could write better descriptions of the Jewish holidays! You want me to stop- block my access to prevent my replying and then post all the insults you want to. thats generally the way cowards with moderator powers on websites do things. Whats funniest of course, is the fact that though you refer to me as a troll, you seem desperate to keep my edits on the posts about Jewish holidays. Seems I'm only a troll when I disagree with you! Pretty typical when dealing with censorship- throw insults around at everyone who disagrees with you (talk) 18:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Allon. I've just noticed this talk page which seems to be getting a bit heated. I don't really have time to follow things up, but are you raising what you feel to be issues on the appropriate talk pages? If you are then I hope they are being addressed there. --BobSpring is sprung! 19:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Nope- I won't be adding any firther content and I will be advising my mailing to avoid this site and to inform others. It is clear that there is a clear bias being pushed and I will not waste my time making edits in good faith and providing reference only for some power mad moderator to call me a troll and reverse all my edits. Hey, I was actually looking forward to participating and getting the exceptionally inaccurate pages about Judaism and Jewish beliefs updated. But since it is obvious that gping against the "tone of the page" and correcting incorrect information, misconceptions and lies is just going to have my edits removed, I am not going to waste my time. Instead, the very inaccurate content I had intended to fix will be used to prove the bias and agenda of this site. AllonY (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Well, if you are not prepared to explain your differences on the talk pages of the articles in question then there is not a lot I can say to help you. Have you read the RationalWiki:Newcomers guide which has suggestions about how to suggest changes to articles you feel strongly about?--BobSpring is sprung! 19:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm not looking for your help; why would I want to stay on a site where some power mad moderator calls me a troll? Or else have some moderator tell me that they prefer the old version, even though the talk page is filled with people stating it is inaccurate and needs editing, because it suits the agenda of the site better. Hey, keep your site agenda, I'll spend my time on sites where censorship to promote bias is not the aim of the site. Where moderators are not on power trips calling people trolls because they don't like what they say. I WILL make sure to tell my mailing list (and congregants, yes I am the Rabbi of a community as well) to avoid this site, to avoid editing on this site and to inform other sabout the bias on this site. And yes, I make typos- it comes from thinking (and typing) in Hebrew almost as much as English. Normally its not ahuge thing- a message to "please review and remove typos has always worked on wikipedia- only here has a moderated threatened me, and then almost immediately blocked me.AllonY (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

For the record, I threatened to put a vandal brake on you after you reverted a correction of the same typos four times in about ten minutes. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 20:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

I reverted a post by you ONCE, thats hardly four times! But hey, make up any story you like to make yourself feel better. Seems that you ar eon such a powe rtrip anyway that a polite request is not something you would have ever considered and a high handed power trip and banning me your preferred action.AllonY (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Heres the link http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Palestine&action=history to the record of the page and the fact that I undid edits ONCE. Hmm, but with your power trip why do I not find your dishonesty surprising?AllonY (talk) 20:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Once. Twice. Three times. I stand corrected. You reinserted typos three times. Still spells "troll" to me. PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 20:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Gee, so now on multiple pages I made revisions LOL Lets face facts, you are a power mad moderator who instead of just stating where the problem was and on what page, decided to go ahead and ban someone and call them troll. The question is- why not remove all my edits from there if I am such a troll? Really, trolls don't post accurate information and you should remove everything posted by the troll. The fact that you insisted on keeping it while I was in the process of removing it shows you did not think my posts were trolling. Come show you are not a hypocrite and remove my posts from the "Yom Kippur" article and revert it to what it was before I started editing. Then i will believe that you thought I was a troll. Anything less and it shows you are on a power trip, use "troll" as an insult knowing it is not true, and are on an ego tripAllonY (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Vandalize RW! Campaign

Join the global anti-stupidity movement, the Vandalize RW! Campaign! -MC — Unsigned, by: TrentsBitch / talk / contribs

No need to vandalise it; as it stands it has so many glaring errors and flaws that any vandalisation would only improve it! I'll eave it as it is, and use those errors to show people how inaccurate it is. Should make for a good laugh when needing a break from serious discussion AllonY (talk) 20:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support