User talk:Armondikov
From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Omniwombat (Talk | contribs) |
Armondikov (Talk | contribs) (→Support or oppose the Science namespace) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Support or oppose the Science namespace== | ==Support or oppose the Science namespace== | ||
Armondikov. After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to [[Debate:Science_namespace#Call_to_question|call the matter to question]]. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page. I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote. Congratulations on your penguin-ness. 18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST) | Armondikov. After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to [[Debate:Science_namespace#Call_to_question|call the matter to question]]. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page. I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote. Congratulations on your penguin-ness. 18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | :I'm now split on the idea, give me a little while to mull it over before I commit to a vote :S I'm almost going with Pi on it that we have a referrence section along with the main articles, but the broadness would then make it easy to confuse science and mainspaces... [[User:Armondikov|<font color=red face="Tahoma">'''''<font size=4>A</font>'''rmondiko'''<font size=4>V</font>'''''</font>]][[User_Talk:Armondikov|{{user:Armondikov/sigtalk}}]] 07:43, 12 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 12 January 2009
human
15:43, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
Demotion
Looks like you are the final victim in out week of demotions. There is a help page somewhere, you can find it yourself. 
09:55, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you very much, I shall follow the set example and abuse the power whenever neccesssary. Armondikov 09:58, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
Congratulations
Support or oppose the Science namespace
Armondikov. After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to call the matter to question. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page. I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote. Congratulations on your penguin-ness. 18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST)
- I'm now split on the idea, give me a little while to mull it over before I commit to a vote :S I'm almost going with Pi on it that we have a referrence section along with the main articles, but the broadness would then make it easy to confuse science and mainspaces... ArmondikoVsshole 07:43, 12 January 2009 (EST)
