User talk:Armondikov

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support or oppose the Science namespace)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Support or oppose the Science namespace==
 
==Support or oppose the Science namespace==
 
Armondikov.  After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to [[Debate:Science_namespace#Call_to_question|call the matter to question]]. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page.  I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote.  Congratulations on your penguin-ness.  18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST)
 
Armondikov.  After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to [[Debate:Science_namespace#Call_to_question|call the matter to question]]. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page.  I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote.  Congratulations on your penguin-ness.  18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST)
 +
:I'm now split on the idea, give me a little while to mull it over before I commit to a vote :S I'm almost going with Pi on it that we have a referrence section along with the main articles, but the broadness would then make it easy to confuse science and mainspaces... [[User:Armondikov|<font color=red face="Tahoma">'''''<font size=4>A</font>'''rmondiko'''<font size=4>V</font>'''''</font>]][[User_Talk:Armondikov|{{user:Armondikov/sigtalk}}]] 07:43, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 12:43, 12 January 2009

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Armondikov!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

humanUser talk:Human 15:43, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

Demotion

Looks like you are the final victim in out week of demotions. There is a help page somewhere, you can find it yourself. \approx\pi 09:55, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Thank you very much, I shall follow the set example and abuse the power whenever neccesssary. Armondikov 09:58, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
Uhm... \approx\pi 10:10, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Congratulations

Armondikov, In recognition of the large check you deposited in my checking account, you are herby promoted to the rank of

Gentoopenguin.jpg
PENGUIN

By earning this promotion, you will be given no new rights per se, but you should know that your ability to swim and eat live fish will now increase tenfold, and you will always look fabulous in a tuxedo. Should you continue on your meteoric rise here on Rationalwiki, you may be awarded the highest possible honor, that of Penguin Knight. Good luck to you. For more information on rights and responsibilities, please see here


Support or oppose the Science namespace

Armondikov. After hearing the previous debates on the matter, I decided to call the matter to question. Since you responded to my original exhortation in the community standards talk page. I would appreciate it if you'd mosey on over to the debate page and cast a vote. Congratulations on your penguin-ness. 18:25, 11 January 2009 (EST)

I'm now split on the idea, give me a little while to mull it over before I commit to a vote :S I'm almost going with Pi on it that we have a referrence section along with the main articles, but the broadness would then make it easy to confuse science and mainspaces... ArmondikoVsshole 07:43, 12 January 2009 (EST)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support