User talk:BruceGrubb

From RationalWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(stupid question)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Oh, ps.  i'm starting to study "theory of mind" (science, not philo) to help with my studies of language evo.  Any suggests from an anthro point of view, of books about physical evo of the mind (brain) or language production features... just curious--[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]<font face="Estrangelo Edessa">[[User:WaitingforGodot|<font color="Blue">En attendant Godot</font>]]</font> 16:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 
Oh, ps.  i'm starting to study "theory of mind" (science, not philo) to help with my studies of language evo.  Any suggests from an anthro point of view, of books about physical evo of the mind (brain) or language production features... just curious--[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]<font face="Estrangelo Edessa">[[User:WaitingforGodot|<font color="Blue">En attendant Godot</font>]]</font> 16:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
  
:I took accounting when thanks to government cutbacks the three subfields I had expertise in (contact anthropology, archeology, and museum science) all got clobbered.  
+
:I took accounting when thanks to government cutbacks the three subfields I had expertise in (contact anthropology, archeology, and museum science) all got clobbered. I don't know of books on the physical evo of the mind but I do know of a book that can be best described as the anthropology of archeology; it's Bruce Trigger's ''A History of Archaeological Thought''.  It is arguable the best book on the views of archeology (and therefore anthropology) through the years as it shows how the views of the time the researchers lived in shaped how they saw the world.--[[User:BruceGrubb|BruceGrubb]] ([[User talk:BruceGrubb|talk]]) 16:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't know of books on the physical evo of the mind but I do know of a book that can be best described as the anthropology of archeology; it's Bruce Trigger's ''A History of Archaeological Thought''.  It is arguable the best book on the views of archeology (and therefore anthropology) through the years as it shows how the views of the time the researchers lived in shaped how they saw the world.--[[User:BruceGrubb|BruceGrubb]] ([[User talk:BruceGrubb|talk]]) 16:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
+

Latest revision as of 16:23, 7 July 2011

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, BruceGrubb!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Hi and thanks for joining. I'm sure that you'll fit right in.  :-) --BobSpring is sprung! 16:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Sysop

Yep. P-FosterCan't we talk about this, baby?Moderator 15:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] stupid question

Why anthropology AND accounting? Are you trying to show when accountants first evolved.  ;-) Oh, ps. i'm starting to study "theory of mind" (science, not philo) to help with my studies of language evo. Any suggests from an anthro point of view, of books about physical evo of the mind (brain) or language production features... just curious--Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 16:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I took accounting when thanks to government cutbacks the three subfields I had expertise in (contact anthropology, archeology, and museum science) all got clobbered. I don't know of books on the physical evo of the mind but I do know of a book that can be best described as the anthropology of archeology; it's Bruce Trigger's A History of Archaeological Thought. It is arguable the best book on the views of archeology (and therefore anthropology) through the years as it shows how the views of the time the researchers lived in shaped how they saw the world.--BruceGrubb (talk) 16:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
support