User talk:EVDebs
(→Damn you for being so productive!) |
(→Damn you for being so productive!) |
||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
Quite writing numerous useful articles, you're making the rest of us look bad! :-) --{{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 05:14, 29 January 2008 (EST) | Quite writing numerous useful articles, you're making the rest of us look bad! :-) --{{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 05:14, 29 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:Yes. EVDebs, you are clearly in violation of our 99/1 commandment. I expect to see more talk, talk, talk and less valuable contributions from you in the future. Please help us run this non-encyclopedic learning resource into the ground. Goatspeed. --[[User:AKjeldsen|'''<font color="navy">AKjeldsen</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:AKjeldsen |<font color="aqua">Godspeed!</font>]]</sup> 06:51, 29 January 2008 (EST) | :Yes. EVDebs, you are clearly in violation of our 99/1 commandment. I expect to see more talk, talk, talk and less valuable contributions from you in the future. Please help us run this non-encyclopedic learning resource into the ground. Goatspeed. --[[User:AKjeldsen|'''<font color="navy">AKjeldsen</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:AKjeldsen |<font color="aqua">Godspeed!</font>]]</sup> 06:51, 29 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I hate you all, and just for that I'm going to write like two more articles tonight just out of sheer spite. (You guys can contribute...) [[User:EVDebs|EVDebs]] 00:11, 30 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:11, 30 January 2008
Welcome! Its great to have you here, I am sorry for nuking your open source article, it was great actually :). Hopefully I have atoned for my sin by helping get this project here rolling. I think you will find most of us here value wikipedia a lot and agree with its missions and goals (and many of us edit there). I am pushing the idea that RW should be complimentary to wikipedia, I am encouraging the meme that what we should offer is an article that people can come to after reading wikipedia and learn something new, see a new perspective or be engaged in a way that wikipedia can not because of its guidelines. I hope you will enjoy your time here.
Anyway, again welcome, and I am sure I will be bumping into you frequently as we go. tmtoulouse pester 21:27, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
- Well, I for one welcome our new socialist overlord.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 21:40, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
- Thanks for the welcoming. I hope I'll have a few good things to contribute. (BTW, TMT, the only regret I have is that you caught me before I could add a few references -- I was totally going to go Coulter on the page and add a bunch of misleading links, just like the creationist articles, and I'm pretty sure I could have found a "reliable" source for at least 75% of what I said. At least you tried to make that cesspool live up to its own billing; too bad ASchlafly's so autocratic and paranoid.) EVDebs 23:31, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
- *sigh*, are you a front for the entire godless liberal conspiracy worldwide???? ..... if so, then welcome! You might see me around a bit, you socialist swine. --ηοξιμαχονγ 23:36, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
So, no kidding, EVDebs isn't your real name :-) ? Hahaha, Eugene Debs is a hilarious historical figure. Welcome, glad to have someone who's from a respectable site around here. As you can see, most of the rest of us are the dregs of the interwebs. Welcome, and hope you have fun!-αmεσ (!) 19:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
- Eugene Debs is awesome. But not as awesome as Huey Long. G
dlessLiberal 08:54, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
- Eugene Debs is awesome. But not as awesome as Huey Long. G
Contents |
EVDebs
"does not consider scientific/rationalist POV to be inherently equivalent to NPOV"
- Context matters. For some articles, the historical/social science/political science POV is the NPOV. Heart♥GoldPreach to somebody not in the choir 00:51, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
- Indeed, thus the weasel word "inherently". The problem is that at Wikipedia, it isn't always the NPOV. EVDebs 00:55, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed.Heart♥GoldPreach to somebody not in the choir 01:01, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
- Indeed, thus the weasel word "inherently". The problem is that at Wikipedia, it isn't always the NPOV. EVDebs 00:55, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
block
The reason for your block was random. Human agreed to make me sysop for 6 seconds, and you were just a random casualty. I also blocked three or four others. So no, I didn't really take issue with your name, and I am not really a sysop. Bohdan 00:53, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
- I just died laughing from reading your "welcome box". Bohdan is a hard-core commie and is on our side, except he hates socialists. Go figure. humanbe in 01:58, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
Sick Bastid
With all those "bible translation" UXBs. I'm waiting, nervously, for the N-word Bible UXB (care of Dave Chappelle?). Or not... humanbe in 01:56, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
Good Vibrations
I've played with your vibrator vibrations art - you might lije to play again. Susan Jayne Garlicktalk 09:42, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
Dreaded redlink
You've got a redlink on your userpage: singularity, might like to link it to Black hole? SJGsjg 21:24, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Would you mind looking at an article for me?
I made an article on Zionism, and I was wondering if you would look over it for me. Since you're obviously very knowledgable in things pertaining to Judaism, more so than me, I'd like you to look at it and make sure I didn't accidently pass on any kinds of stupidities or accidentally make anything up. Researcher 22:32, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- Well, it could use a lot of cleanup and some references, but it's a great start. And I'm not that knowledgeable about Judaism, though maybe a bit more than most by virtue of having been a bit of a fanboy (I grew up Catholic and I'm now an atheist). I'll take a hack, though. EVDebs 22:43, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- I'd greatly appreciate it. I mostly work on this site from work, where I don't have time to do things really properly. And, when it comes to this, I was mostly working from the fuzzy understanding I've picked up from poli sci theory, rather than historical studies or Jewish studies. (I went through some phases of religious fanboyism as well as a youth--perhaps I shoudl write a page about Vodun at some point...) Researcher 22:49, 28 November 2007 (EST)
Move
I hope you get around to fixing all those double redirects you left behind when you moved Bible translations to Guide to Bible translations --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 11:08, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- I'm not sure exactly what you want me to do -- if I read the "what links here" page correctly on Bible translations, most of those were done when you merged all the individual translation articles into that one article. I took a couple of links out of Bible, but I wasn't responsible for the links in the other article on "kinds". EVDebs 14:37, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- "Double redirects" can be listed from "special pages". Just list 'em, see where they end up and fix them? Shouldn't take too long I hope. human
16:00, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- Thanks. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 17:33, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- No, thank you (or whoever did) for catching them and making them go away! human
18:46, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- Wut r u talking about?!!!!!!!!!!! --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 18:48, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- Someone fixed them. human
18:51, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- Someone fixed them. human
- Wut r u talking about?!!!!!!!!!!! --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 18:48, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- No, thank you (or whoever did) for catching them and making them go away! human
- Thanks. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 17:33, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- "Double redirects" can be listed from "special pages". Just list 'em, see where they end up and fix them? Shouldn't take too long I hope. human
Evening!
What on God's brown polluted earth are you doing up at this hour, editing away? --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 03:02, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- Chronic depression + chronic unemployment = strange sleep cycles. Even though I live on the East Coast I've been essentially on Pacific time for the last two years or so. (BTW, I'm not quite sure I remember what the afikomen is (isn't that the hidden matza?), but your username -- it is something that could ruin a Seder, yes?) EVDebs 03:29, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- Well, it ruins things only if cancer is a bad thing... --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 19:12, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- Haha, I'm almost on Hawaii time half the time. Whiel living in EST like you. human
19:25, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- I'm in EST, but constantly, um, awake, so I should really switch to Zulu. Yes, a radioactive afikomen would really ruin a seder. Might be cool tho.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 20:05, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- I've been waiting a long time for an opportunity to inform others of this, but the color for the initials "RA" in my signature was chosen to reflect the "true" color of radiation (you can check pictures of the insides of working nuclear reactors to verify), as opposed to the green color supposed by pop culture (a fallacy largely spread by the Simpsons cartoon). Not that any of you care *sniffle*. --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 00:37, 14 December 2007 (EST)
- That's very Cherenkovian. As it happens, I heard somewhere that free electrons in solution are quite blue. EVDebs 00:40, 14 December 2007 (EST)
- I've been waiting a long time for an opportunity to inform others of this, but the color for the initials "RA" in my signature was chosen to reflect the "true" color of radiation (you can check pictures of the insides of working nuclear reactors to verify), as opposed to the green color supposed by pop culture (a fallacy largely spread by the Simpsons cartoon). Not that any of you care *sniffle*. --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 00:37, 14 December 2007 (EST)
- I'm in EST, but constantly, um, awake, so I should really switch to Zulu. Yes, a radioactive afikomen would really ruin a seder. Might be cool tho.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 20:05, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- Haha, I'm almost on Hawaii time half the time. Whiel living in EST like you. human
- Well, it ruins things only if cancer is a bad thing... --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 19:12, 6 December 2007 (EST)
commenting out
hey, I saw what you did at chickenhawk - I think it makes more sense to cut and paste weird stuff like that to the talk page? otherwise it just vanishes... human
00:01, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- Sure, if you want. Personally, I think if it belongs anywhere it belongs on Bill Clinton, though. EVDebs 00:07, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- Hey, that would be fine. The only problem with commenting out via html is it sorta vanishes. Rather than being discussed, say, on the talk page. Just sayin', is all. I know you meant well. human
00:37, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- Hey, that would be fine. The only problem with commenting out via html is it sorta vanishes. Rather than being discussed, say, on the talk page. Just sayin', is all. I know you meant well. human
Michael Jackson Liberal
So we attack him even though he`s a liberal because on the whole he`s an idiot? Well maybe thats an American opinon based on American bias. The fact that he ended racism in music and MTV, was 1 of the first people in the 80`s to support Aids charities despite its taboo attachments from the conservative right, has given 300 million dollars to charity, is a friend of bill clinton, basically means he is a desent person outside of the media spotlight and is a very well known liberal. Realist2 16:50, 17 December 2007 (EST)
- I think you want Liberalpedia. We only do politics as it relates to rational thinking, and even from a liberal standpoint, people who support scammers like Geller do more to hurt liberalism than they help; they perpetuate stereotypes that liberals are soft of mind as well as soft of heart, which we simply don't need. EVDebs 20:08, 17 December 2007 (EST)
And not a child molester! No! Definitely not! 193.113.235.174 17:07, 17 December 2007 (EST)
- Well, as a matter of law he isn't. As a matter of fact, who knows. He's certainly an expert at incriminating himself enough to ruin his rep without getting convicted. EVDebs 20:08, 17 December 2007 (EST)
- I agree with the Debster on this one. The mention is only a "slander" of Jackson inasmuch as he gets taken in by Geller's woo. It illustrates Geller's hanger-on-ism without impugning anything about Jackson except his credulity. human
20:24, 17 December 2007 (EST)
- I agree with the Debster on this one. The mention is only a "slander" of Jackson inasmuch as he gets taken in by Geller's woo. It illustrates Geller's hanger-on-ism without impugning anything about Jackson except his credulity. human
Also in the edit summary you called me chris crocker, i know who this person is and i would like to no why you found it necessary to make this comment, was it ment to be an insult and if so why would I find it insulting? Please get back to me on this directly. Realist2 09:30, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- If you know who Chris Crocker is, you have a pretty good idea of what I was getting at. Basically the message is "lighten up". EVDebs 11:54, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- Yes hes the gay internet Britney fan who gets a hell of a lot of hastle of the conservative right. If your intention was to label me a homosexual by calling me chris Crocker (which I suspect it was) I would like you to know that it didn`t bother me. Realist2 15:18, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- I think rather than calling you a homosexual he was calling you an obsessed fan-boy who takes things too personally. Researcher 16:08, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- I wouldn't even say obsessed per se -- just incredibly over-the-top. And badly -- and willfully -- misinformed about the point of this site. EVDebs 16:21, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- I think rather than calling you a homosexual he was calling you an obsessed fan-boy who takes things too personally. Researcher 16:08, 18 December 2007 (EST)
Why have you reverted my edit on Mein Kampf ?
Dreadnought 11:32, 2 January 2008 (EST)
Damn you for being so productive!
Quite writing numerous useful articles, you're making the rest of us look bad! :-) --
Radioactive Misanthrope 05:14, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- Yes. EVDebs, you are clearly in violation of our 99/1 commandment. I expect to see more talk, talk, talk and less valuable contributions from you in the future. Please help us run this non-encyclopedic learning resource into the ground. Goatspeed. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 06:51, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- I hate you all, and just for that I'm going to write like two more articles tonight just out of sheer spite. (You guys can contribute...) EVDebs 00:11, 30 January 2008 (EST)