User talk:Earthland
(→191 Facts) |
Ace McWicked (Talk | contribs) (→Don't leave, butter-cup: new section) |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
:Go ahead. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 09:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | :Go ahead. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 09:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Don't leave, butter-cup == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would you stay if I changed my name to Skyland? [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>i9</sup>]] 10:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:42, 8 January 2010
Welcome to the wiki, Earthland! SJ Debaser 17:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)- You forgot a comma. Stupid evil Hoover! 17:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi. I see that in the abortion debate you were wondering why we called you "BoN". You were previously editing as an IP - that is to say you did not have an account. Accordingly all we saw of your identity was your IP Number. A Bunch Of Numbers. Typically anybody who edits here as an IP gets called "BoN". Getting an account is a good idea as people tend to take you more seriously. Welcome.--BobNot Jim 17:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi. Earthland. I note that you have previously told us. " Btw, I am not religious, I don't even consider myself conservative. ..." and "I am gay myself, but ..."
- While I would not for one moment wish to suggest that you were being less than honest, you should be aware that our mainpage states: "We welcome contributors, and encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in constructive dialogue." In other words, nobody needs to claim to be an atheist, liberal homosexual in order to participate in debates here.--BobNot Jim 14:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi. I see that in the abortion debate you were wondering why we called you "BoN". You were previously editing as an IP - that is to say you did not have an account. Accordingly all we saw of your identity was your IP Number. A Bunch Of Numbers. Typically anybody who edits here as an IP gets called "BoN". Getting an account is a good idea as people tend to take you more seriously. Welcome.--BobNot Jim 17:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Contents |
Sysop
You are now a sysop. Manual here. Stupid evil Hoover! 17:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
User page
I really don't like red userpage links, so I made you a user page that redirects to your talk. If you want to, you can delete it, if not, well... at least that is one less red link :) Javasca₧ I know Anonymous user proves close to tomfoolerys. 13:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Estonia
I've heard great things. how would an english-speaker fare? are there too many Russians? — Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 18:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- English-speaker survives, if not something more. Everyone in Estonia can speak English, but it doesn't always sound like English. My father is half-russian. About 25 % are Russians, but the percentage is decreasing. I heard the horror movie "Orphan" mentions Estonia. It's probably the best advertisement a small eastern-Europe country can wish for. --Earthland 18:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- I heard it was very libertarian, secular, extremely free press, transparent e-government, "the silicon valley of the baltic", flat tax, etc. Sounds like a place I'd love to go. I was dead-set on it last time I was in Europe, but it's kind of difficult to get there. — Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 18:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- English-speaker survives, if not something more. Everyone in Estonia can speak English, but it doesn't always sound like English. My father is half-russian. About 25 % are Russians, but the percentage is decreasing. I heard the horror movie "Orphan" mentions Estonia. It's probably the best advertisement a small eastern-Europe country can wish for. --Earthland 18:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Estonian is obviously the main and only official language. Estonia is also the most atheist country in the European Union.--Earthland 13:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
'sometimes quite quite demagogic website.'
Thank you. Maybe if you plug at them they might get the message. MarcusCicero 20:22, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Your essay
People are considering deleting it. I would recommend that you hightail over to its talk page and defend it. --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 23:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I think we are only talking about the plagiarised bits.--BobNot Jim 07:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Abortion and deleted edits
Please, discuss huge revisions on the talk page--and making that many mistakes in a single for others to clean up is kinda obnoxious. RaoulDuke 21:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Trolling
I have replied on my talk page. Bob Soles 18:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
And again. Bob Soles 20:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
And this might interest. Bob Soles 00:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
You've gone quiet
Is all OK? Bob Soles 22:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Real life is disturbing me consistently. You know, all these things that happen to me when I'm away from the computer. But you can be sure I won't leave RW that easily ... --Earthland 14:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
MarcusCicero
Read this little tidbit on him to learn a little about his trolling history here. The Goonie Punk Can't sleep, clowns will eat me! 18:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sir
I put forward the theory that you are Andrew Schlafly in disguise. SJ Debaser 20:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- How did you figure it out? Did you see trough the blatant lie that I have receive two blocks from conservapedia, while Aschlafly's block log indicates that Andrew Schlalfy has received six blocks from his very own blog? --Earthland 20:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is classic Schlafly. ωεαşεζόίď
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Huh, that was, at least, intentional. --Earthland (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is classic Schlafly. ωεαşεζόίď
- How did you figure it out? Did you see trough the blatant lie that I have receive two blocks from conservapedia, while Aschlafly's block log indicates that Andrew Schlalfy has received six blocks from his very own blog? --Earthland 20:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Abortion
I forgot you were the guy that wrote the "I oppose abortion" essay. I haven't read it, but I'm assuming that you're evil. Am I correct? SJ Debaser 22:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Your blocking MO.
Your blocking of CGB borders on abusive--you don't like what he says, argue with him, or ignore him. You don't have the right to block him for what he says on your talk page or anywhere else. Smarten up. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I was coming here to say the same thing. Not cool.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 18:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I blocked him for lying, not because I simply didn't like him. I try to ignore him. --Earthland (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- This isn't Conservapedia; you can't block someone just because you think they're lying. That's not your judgment call to make.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 18:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I blocked him for lying, not because I simply didn't like him. I try to ignore him. --Earthland (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- The hypocrisy is painful, it rips through my pores to acknowledge it. What on earth? 'thats not your call to make' - what about your decision to oust me? What about that? You people are disgraceful hypocrites who enjoy pretending to be servants of reason - however when someone comes along and calls you out for your collective idiocy and propaganda, you vandal bin him. RW has a lot to be ashamed of, but this hypocrisy is by far the most egregious. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
| Why is MarcusCicero unbinned? |
|---|
| Remember:
Hi, This is John's brother. I know he has been using this account for a variety of reasons, none of them productive for his troublesome history of mental health problems. For obvious reasons I don't want to go into details about this but suffice to say my mother and father have decided to withdraw his access from the internet for the duration of his most recent treatment process. I apologise on my brothers behalf for any problems he may have caused this website during his period of instability. As you know, his posts have been of a bizarre quality but that is merely a reflection of his real world mental anguishes. MarcusCicero (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
| And:
|
| And:
My glorious run has ended. This is not a case of 'leaving and never coming back', but more a case of 'burn out'. I created a personality on the internet so radically different from the real life version that I've forgotten even what trolls remorse feels like.. (You can thank Refugee over on RWW for providing the impetus) My highlights on RW:
One regret: Stooping to do the mental illness stunt. That was a terrible miscalculation. Adios RW! I may pop in from time to time, but at least now you'll know for sure than I'm a fully fledged troll! MarcusCicero 19:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC) |
| And:
On the other hand, the temptation to shake the ant farm and watch them scurrying to each others aid is far too great to overcome. MarcusCicero (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
- Oh well this is just fantastic. We all know that individuals capable of piercing through hypocrisy have throughout the history of the world been given pejorative names. It makes it easy to ignore them. We can go back as far as Cassandra in Greek antiquity - the woman who saw everything but was always ignored and laughed at. Throughout history those who dared to speak the truth, at great costs to themselves and their reputations were given insulting names so as to allow the rest of society to ignore them and their 'inconveniant truths'. RW should be ashamed of itself for perpetuating this reactionary historical process. MarcusCicero (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Find some other talk page where you can moan, MC. --Earthland (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just think, all of this moaning would stop if I were unbinned and made a sysop once again. I'd have no reason to pester any of you. I could ruin the wiki for everyone if I so choosed - I have done so before and could do so again! It is only because I am a benevolent man that I don't resort to this. My diplomatic efforts will continue until my just demand is met. MarcusCicero (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
So it's OK for CGB to block Earthland calling him a "fucknut", but Earthland can't respond back? This is why I think block wars should never be done unless in good humour, but it takes two to tango. ConservapediaEditor (talk) 00:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- I blocked him for 3 seconds, after he blocked me for 30. My block was an attempt to show his hypocrisy. Also, I stopped, he did not. δij
02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations
RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor (talk) 05:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- I thought it was "obsession over single issue", but it seems you made it more offensive. --Earthland (talk) 08:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are indeed correct and I have corrected it. Your friendly messenger, ħuman
22:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are indeed correct and I have corrected it. Your friendly messenger, ħuman
191 Facts
I want to steal this.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 22:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Go ahead. --Earthland (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Don't leave, butter-cup
Would you stay if I changed my name to Skyland? Acei9 10:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)