User talk:Femilisk
Revolverman (Talk | contribs) m (→Mongoose: Forgot a :) |
(→Mongoose) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
:::::You can take your "personal vendetta" persecution complex and shove it. The fact remains, that you yourself were only sysopped after making a number of edits, you've been here long enough to know how it works and yet, somehow you see fit to promote people with none, or 1 edit. It doesn't work that way. And again, David, you say teh criteria are zero - which is utter bullshit. How many editors have you promoted immediately upon joining, or after 1 edit? | :::::You can take your "personal vendetta" persecution complex and shove it. The fact remains, that you yourself were only sysopped after making a number of edits, you've been here long enough to know how it works and yet, somehow you see fit to promote people with none, or 1 edit. It doesn't work that way. And again, David, you say teh criteria are zero - which is utter bullshit. How many editors have you promoted immediately upon joining, or after 1 edit? | ||
::::::And given how Mongoose is now trolling, I can't see how they could be considered as a sysop. <font face="Wild Words">[[User:Psygremlin|<b><font color="blue">PsyGremlin</font></b>]]<sup>{{User:Psygremlin/sig}}</sup></font> 14:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | ::::::And given how Mongoose is now trolling, I can't see how they could be considered as a sysop. <font face="Wild Words">[[User:Psygremlin|<b><font color="blue">PsyGremlin</font></b>]]<sup>{{User:Psygremlin/sig}}</sup></font> 14:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::So you are saying you want me and Laurelai off the wiki because ''other'' people promoted us to sysop? {{User:Femilisk/sigsubst}} 14:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 26 June 2014
And remember, judge NOT ALL MEN! - David Gerard (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Contents |
Much sysop. Very editor. So wiki.
You've made a lot of good edits! Which is why you're now a sysop. (There's a manual, but I don't think anyone reads it.)
Radioactive Misanthrope 08:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Expanding templates
Please be careful which templates you expand (by adding the "subst:" prefix to their name in the code). Template:Stub, for example, is never supposed to be expanded (you did that in Scholarpedia). Thank you.--ZooGuard (talk) 09:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Femilisk™
A long-term contraceptive! - David Gerard (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Shhh... No Tears
Only dreams now. --Revolverman (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
question
do you plan to do lots of wikignoming?--Miekal 21:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Do I have to report to you? ·Femilisk² 22:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I smell tears. --Dgener8 (talk) 22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- What kind of stupid leaping to conclusions is this? Miekal was clearly approaching Femilisk to see if he could help with any planned wikignoming. Nullahnung (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Actually i was asking if they wanted ninja if the answer was yes--Miekal 22:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- ninja? :) ·Femilisk² 22:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lets you mask yourself as a bot, traditional thing for those who do lots of catting and other gnoming.. basically, do you plan to do it enough to give you it?--Miekal 22:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- sure, I'm pedantic and I like putting things in categories. I was mistakenly under the impression gnoming means trolling. ·Femilisk² 22:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- alrighty then, just rember to turn it off when you're done--Miekal 22:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- is there a guide? I have no idea what I'm doing. ·Femilisk² 06:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lets you mask yourself as a bot, traditional thing for those who do lots of catting and other gnoming.. basically, do you plan to do it enough to give you it?--Miekal 22:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- ninja? :) ·Femilisk² 22:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I smell tears. --Dgener8 (talk) 22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Sidebanners
It's a general rule around here to limit the number of sidebanners on each article to one. Pick the one you think best describes the article and put it on, but try not to double up. Zero (talk - contributions) 12:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Mongoose
Sorry, but 1 edit, later reverted, does not a sysop make. PsyGremlin말하십시오 13:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- They were having trouble wikignoming and PMed me on FB. Either way, I'm sure they are able to survive without superpowers. So no prob. ·Femilisk² 13:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- If Lauralee deliberately ignores comments made in the edit summary - twice, then it's clear action must be taken. Especially when it's somebody who herself is new to the wiki. PsyGremlin말하십시오 13:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- So, Psygremlin, that Blunt Knives thing, how's that working out for you? Feeling a bit... short?User:Mongoose/sig
- Could you not be so heavy-handed? I thought the criteria for sysop were near zero? I get that a person with one edit complaining about problems with captcha is not sysop-worthy! But Laurelai is a good RWian. Her contributions are good. She has been doing stuff. ·Femilisk² 13:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Because for years we have had a system that has worked very well and it's not going to be broken, just because your friends want to join the wiki. The fact that lauralee was made a sysop with out an edit is another example of this favouritism. Given that you've sysopped somebody who doesn't even know how to sign their posts speaks volumes.
- And Mongoose, the fact that you bring that up, in a totally unrelated subject, speaks volumes. So well done there. PsyGremlin말하십시오 14:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hush little Gremlin, don't say a word, Mongoose gonna buy you a mocking cobra...Mongoose (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Let not provoke people please? There's enough that on this Wiki already. --Revolverman (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hush little Gremlin, don't say a word, Mongoose gonna buy you a mocking cobra...Mongoose (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- The criteria for sysop have always been pretty much zero. I've always opped people as long as I think they're not actually insane. There's really very little a MediaWiki sysop can do to break things. I have little to no idea what historical basis Psy is working from here - David Gerard (talk) 14:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- The basis of a personal vendetta? Look, I wasn't the one that sysoped Laurelai when she joined. Is that what bothers you? Otherwise, I accepted I was wrong with helping somebody who couldn't get past the captcha - I accepted that off the bat. ·Femilisk² 14:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- I dont think you were wrong though. --Laurelai (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- You can take your "personal vendetta" persecution complex and shove it. The fact remains, that you yourself were only sysopped after making a number of edits, you've been here long enough to know how it works and yet, somehow you see fit to promote people with none, or 1 edit. It doesn't work that way. And again, David, you say teh criteria are zero - which is utter bullshit. How many editors have you promoted immediately upon joining, or after 1 edit?
- And given how Mongoose is now trolling, I can't see how they could be considered as a sysop. PsyGremlin말하십시오 14:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- The basis of a personal vendetta? Look, I wasn't the one that sysoped Laurelai when she joined. Is that what bothers you? Otherwise, I accepted I was wrong with helping somebody who couldn't get past the captcha - I accepted that off the bat. ·Femilisk² 14:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- So, Psygremlin, that Blunt Knives thing, how's that working out for you? Feeling a bit... short?User:Mongoose/sig
- If Lauralee deliberately ignores comments made in the edit summary - twice, then it's clear action must be taken. Especially when it's somebody who herself is new to the wiki. PsyGremlin말하십시오 13:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)