User talk:Nebuchadnezzar
(→subcat for your essay: new section) |
(→subcat for your essay) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
philo or religion? or other... --[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]<font face="Estrangelo Edessa">[[User:WaitingforGodot|<font color="Blue">Godot</font>]]</font><font color="purple"><small>Tue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi.</small></font> 18:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[[Essay:Better rhetoric through bullshitting]] | philo or religion? or other... --[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]<font face="Estrangelo Edessa">[[User:WaitingforGodot|<font color="Blue">Godot</font>]]</font><font color="purple"><small>Tue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi.</small></font> 18:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[[Essay:Better rhetoric through bullshitting]] | ||
| + | :Philo, maybe, which also reminds me that I wanted to add something to that, but forgot what it was. Hate when that happens. [[User:Nebuchadnezzar|Nebuchadnezzar]] ([[User talk:Nebuchadnezzar|talk]]) 18:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 22 October 2011
Contents |
ref = name
I forgot how to do "ref = name" for citing one reference more than one time. Any chance you know of an article off the top of your head that uses it? Thanks in advance.
Godot Warning, chocolate will make your clothes shrink 17:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's <ref name="refx"> Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 17:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
truthy gays
you working on this still? if you're done, let me know and i'll take a crack at it. casue it sounds uber fun to write. damn fucking "worry about everyone else but yourself" nosy bitches.
Godot Warning, chocolate will make your clothes shrink 23:42, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't know much about them. I only found out about them due to some incident where they boycotted a hotel over some S&M event. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 23:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent. what better to do with your life than boycott a hotel that you will never visit anyhow, cause you are too fucking cheep ass and xenophobic to get out into the world and see life -- boycott a hotel, cause they like to use paddles and walk around in leather! I should boycott something. but what?--
Godot Warning, chocolate will make your clothes shrink 23:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Reality. It's fun. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 00:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- the prancing around a hotel in leather? no comment. ;-) --
Godot Warning, chocolate will make your clothes shrink 00:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- No, I meant to boycott reality. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 00:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent. what better to do with your life than boycott a hotel that you will never visit anyhow, cause you are too fucking cheep ass and xenophobic to get out into the world and see life -- boycott a hotel, cause they like to use paddles and walk around in leather! I should boycott something. but what?--
Wow
That WND link about the NCSF is impressively balanced for WND! They didn't even take the low road and quote-mine the fuck out of Susan Wright. ADK...I'll pull your Pontiac! 08:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Although the related one is funny on the grounds of "this is sick and wrong and no one should ever be involved... so let's describe it in as much juicy detail as possible!" The Daily Mail would be proud. ADK...I'll snap your t-shirt! 08:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is one of the cases where quote mining would defeat their purpose -- they need to give their readers as much fodder for voyeurism as possible. Whips! Candle wax! Gays! Cover your eyes, chillun, the freaks are about! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 09:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've never quite understood the voyeurism. Yes, there are plenty of curtain twitchers out there but I don't get it. It's not like they need all the information they can get in order to refute it or anything like that, and of course you can moralise without giving a citation in full. ADK...I'll crystallize your crab cake! 09:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Shock value -- it mobilizes the base. You can't properly moralize without all the sordid details. The funny thing is that a lot of the what goes on at these types of events is the most hardcore stuff because the potentially really dangerous things are generally done with professionals, for obvious reasons. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've never quite understood the voyeurism. Yes, there are plenty of curtain twitchers out there but I don't get it. It's not like they need all the information they can get in order to refute it or anything like that, and of course you can moralise without giving a citation in full. ADK...I'll crystallize your crab cake! 09:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is one of the cases where quote mining would defeat their purpose -- they need to give their readers as much fodder for voyeurism as possible. Whips! Candle wax! Gays! Cover your eyes, chillun, the freaks are about! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 09:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
aaw man
Bronze at least? Or maybe some feedback?--"Shut up, Brx." 03:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- 1, Nope. 2, More refs, maybe? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
comparative guide
Thanks for working on it. steriletalk 02:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Obama is a communist
He passed Obamacare and the bailouts. He's a communist. Talsley (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
(Also, too...) Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Religion space
FYI, i'm being very careful about these cats. Creationism is in both christainity and it's own space. Both of those are in the Cat religion - so they don't need to be duplicated. The "religion" non sub space is for things that are specific to all religions. :-)
- Ah, I see. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Get back to my user page!
We must return to our evil Adam Smith socialist discussion. Osaka Sun (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Me.
as I said on b-flat's page, I was feeling really guilty about the total slash job I've been part of for now 2 days. It's necessary slashing. but i feel like such a meanie. ;-) So yes, it can be MUCH shorter, but i thought i'd give it a day or two.
GodotNo, That's not the same thing. You just don't get it". 20:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Honestly, I've only skimmed a bit of it. Much of it seems redundant. I don't want to edit the Comfort stuff too much, though, because I haven't read any of his stuff -- the only thing I know about him is "crocoduck," which immediately puts him into the blithering idiot category. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
subcat for your essay
philo or religion? or other... --
GodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 18:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Essay:Better rhetoric through bullshitting
- Philo, maybe, which also reminds me that I wanted to add something to that, but forgot what it was. Hate when that happens. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)