User talk:Nx

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Nx, bro,108:46, 9 February 2014
LQT and recent changes318:14, 26 January 2013
Sysopship220:56, 27 October 2012
Time Served420:34, 27 October 2012
What...401:23, 26 October 2012
First page
First page
Previous page
Previous page
Last page
Last page

Did you like B5:Crusade? Gary Cole is one of my favorite actors. Have you tried any of the Babylon 5 novels? Are they any good? What does Nx mean? Anything to do with this? Dude, talk to me. I'm bored. Pls?

"Shut up, Brx."08:45, 9 February 2014

wo, sigs work in LQT. I wonder if that means anything. Say, what do you do for a living? Also, I noticed that your email is active here. Does that mean I can send you inane messages from time to time? Don't be surly!

"Shut up, Brx."08:46, 9 February 2014
 

LQT and recent changes

Would it be possible to make it so LQT posts show up on recent changes all under a single tab for each thread? That way, if this discussion reached a million and a half posts, instead of clogging up recent changes, each post in the thread would appear under the tab Thread:User talk:Nx/LQT and recent changes. Then the tab could be opened or collapse just like with enhanced recent changes, where all edits to a same article are under the same tab.

This would effectively eliminate LQT's primary weakness. Could you, David Gerard, and tmt cook something up?

"Shut up, Brx."01:07, 2 January 2013

Nx no longer has server access, one. (You should ask Pi, I heard he has server access. *trollface*) Two, aren't you just asking for an enhanced-RC-friendly LQT?

Picon small.pngLiquid Blue10:47, 25 January 2013

Pretty much. Do you think it's possible? I asked Nx because I know Nx better than David Gerard, and he's far more knowledgeable than anyone when it comes to liquid threads.

"Shut up, Brx."17:30, 25 January 2013

I've never seen the code for enhance RC. If you found it for me I'd happily take a look, but the chances are slim anyone could do what you're asking.

Picon small.pngLiquid Blue18:14, 26 January 2013
 
 
 

I'm quite willing to let my sysopship go. Some people clearly don't trust me (some probably never have), so for the sake of avoiding an HCM, I'm willing to pass on it.

I would take my sysop rights away, but I can't do that.

ʤɱ{{User:UHM/sig/isms|20:49, 27 October 2012

There's no point playing martyr. They're too stupid to get the point. I'd keep the sysopship, in case you get harrassed with abusive blocks

-- Nx / talk20:52, 27 October 2012

As an HCM brx-style with wheel warring would cause more distress to me than having the rights gives me, I'm being the egocentric ass and letting them go. No kidding, that's my reasoning.

ʤɱ{{User:UHM/sig/isms|20:56, 27 October 2012
 
 

'fraid not.

Acei919:36, 27 October 2012

Check again

-- Nx / talk20:28, 27 October 2012

I don't care.

Acei920:32, 27 October 2012
 

Maybe he wants to lose his sysop rights for good this time.

"Shut up, Brx."20:33, 27 October 2012

Go for it, Brx. Good luck.

Acei920:34, 27 October 2012
 
 
 

...does the red button on Capturebot2's userpage do? I'm tempted to click it.

Andynot Schlafly19:34, 25 October 2012

It blocks the bot's user account. Don't do it.

-- Nx / talk19:41, 25 October 2012
 
 
First page
First page
Previous page
Previous page
Last page
Last page
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support