User talk:RobSmith
(→Bernardine Dohrn) |
Nutty Roux (Talk | contribs) (→Bernardine Dohrn) |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Hi Rob, I'm directing this to you since you have a morbid fascination for leftists you can call terrorists and you've been editing this article the most, although it still more or less resembles the [http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/individuals_agents.htm source] TK lifted it from without attribution in December 2008. I guess that would explain why it's still thin on citations, right? Anyway, there are a few things I'm curious about that perhaps you'd be so good as to source. The article repeatedly refers to Dohrn as a disbarred attorney. What's the source for this? What state? I'll look it up for you if you know. I realize it's tough to source stuff that someone else wrote. Also, footnote 4 doesn't remotely support the claim that she's suspected of committing a murder in San Francisco. I'm pretty sure Conservapedia doesn't care about repeating defamatory statements against people Andy and his pals dislike, but you might as well source them if you can because Conservapedia is the trusworth encyclopedia. Look forward to hearing from you. {{:User:Nutty Roux/sig|}} 14:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | Hi Rob, I'm directing this to you since you have a morbid fascination for leftists you can call terrorists and you've been editing this article the most, although it still more or less resembles the [http://www.basicsproject.org/american_fifth_column/individuals_agents.htm source] TK lifted it from without attribution in December 2008. I guess that would explain why it's still thin on citations, right? Anyway, there are a few things I'm curious about that perhaps you'd be so good as to source. The article repeatedly refers to Dohrn as a disbarred attorney. What's the source for this? What state? I'll look it up for you if you know. I realize it's tough to source stuff that someone else wrote. Also, footnote 4 doesn't remotely support the claim that she's suspected of committing a murder in San Francisco. I'm pretty sure Conservapedia doesn't care about repeating defamatory statements against people Andy and his pals dislike, but you might as well source them if you can because Conservapedia is the trusworth encyclopedia. Look forward to hearing from you. {{:User:Nutty Roux/sig|}} 14:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Will look into these. Shooting from the hip, she pleaded (or pled) guilty to bail jumping, was convicted, so can't hold a law licence in any state, AFAIK. The FBI informer, Larry Gratwohl, published a book in 1976 that says Ayers ''told'' him Bernardine planted the bomb. No one's ever discredited Gratwohl's sworn testimony before Congressional Committees. only recently did the SF cop union ask to reopen a cold case investigation, and rumors are they may be some physical evidence available thatg could not be processed back than. [[User:RobSmith|RobSmith]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|don't bother me]]</sup> 20:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | :Will look into these. Shooting from the hip, she pleaded (or pled) guilty to bail jumping, was convicted, so can't hold a law licence in any state, AFAIK. The FBI informer, Larry Gratwohl, published a book in 1976 that says Ayers ''told'' him Bernardine planted the bomb. No one's ever discredited Gratwohl's sworn testimony before Congressional Committees. only recently did the SF cop union ask to reopen a cold case investigation, and rumors are they may be some physical evidence available thatg could not be processed back than. [[User:RobSmith|RobSmith]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|don't bother me]]</sup> 20:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Unfortunately, conviction of most crimes isn't grounds for disbarment. Only crimes involving dishonest or a person's integrity. I don't think bail jumping counts, but since I don't know what state she was barred up in initially I can't check. She apparently was never an Illinois lawyer, as the records go back before Lincoln and don't get purged merely because someone is convicted of a crime (viz. Ed Vrdolyak). What state was she barred in? You should source the bombing statement in that article if you've got one. {{:User:Nutty Roux/sig|}} 23:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:03, 1 March 2010
Welcome to the unpleased sock tucker. Tetronian you're clueless 21:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)- Unless this is the RobSmith we've come to know and ridicule, you may have to get a name change--I believe we have some RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Renaming_userssort of policy on user names that get to close to the names/i.d's of established users...TheoryOfPractice 22:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- So you are RobS? Why the new handle? TheoryOfPractice 23:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, it's me. Lost my password (or some commie bastard stole it). RobSmith 23:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'll take you at your word, comrade, and sysop you. All power to the soviets!!!! TheoryOfPractice 23:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, it's me. Lost my password (or some commie bastard stole it). RobSmith 23:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- So you are RobS? Why the new handle? TheoryOfPractice 23:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
You know, you can just ask User:Nx to reset your password, and he'll do it. --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 23:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. RobSmithdon't bother me 01:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Contents |
Click raw signatures
-- =w= 01:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
And vote for Mei.
-- =w= 01:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)- Gracias, Signor. RobSmithdon't bother me 01:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Senorita. -- =w= 02:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Awards
You do indeed, as suspected and observed, have a sense of humeur. (I am human, on sabbatical) In absentia 04:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- When Ronaldus Magnus was asked, "Isn't there enough blame to go around?" he responded, "Well, yes. i used to be a Democrat."
- Hey, Human, as a well known defender of the sacred provisions guarding separtaion of church and state, [1] care to collaborate in exposing Bill Clinton's attempt to sieze our Constitutional liberties and force our children in public schools to participate in school prayer? Look at this reversion, [2] it was poperly cited to the Washington Compost, you know, the mainstream rag that destroyed Richard Nixon and exposed Ollie North. RobSmithdon't bother me 04:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is that really you Rob?

04:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yep'n it is. RobSmithdon't bother me 04:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is that really you Rob?
Have you read
Mao - the Unknown Story. Very, very good biography of the man. You'd enjoy it. --Psygremlin講話 18:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm busy at work developing a subsection for CP's Obama article right now entitled, "Maoism". RobSmithdon't bother me 02:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why not just put a heading at the top marked "Smears" and not bother with the rest. Seems that would cover the whole article. --Kels (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Here's a draft opening: "A deep strain of Maoist thought has pervaded Barack Obama's influences throughout his life." One problem I'm wrestling with is, during the Sino-Soviet split, cp:Frank Marshall Davis was acredited with remaining the sole true Stalinist voice on the Honolulu Record, while cp:Koji Ariyoshi and the rest were reprimanded as Maoist deviationists. But Obama's later contacts, Ayers, Dohrn, Jeff Jones, Anita Dunn, et al, all opening embraced Maoism. RobSmithdon't bother me 04:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- You done need do moar researchs. You haz no cluu wha youz is talking about. δij
04:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- I thought Prof. Ayers and Prof. Dohrn were more New Left, heterodox types than orthodox Maoists.
ListenerXTalkerX 04:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- For openers, we have the cp:PFOC, inspired by Chairman Mao. Jeff Jones was a co-author/organizer. Through Jeff Jones we have another Obama connection -- cp:Van Jones. RobSmithdon't bother me 20:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- I thought Prof. Ayers and Prof. Dohrn were more New Left, heterodox types than orthodox Maoists.
- You done need do moar researchs. You haz no cluu wha youz is talking about. δij
- Here's a draft opening: "A deep strain of Maoist thought has pervaded Barack Obama's influences throughout his life." One problem I'm wrestling with is, during the Sino-Soviet split, cp:Frank Marshall Davis was acredited with remaining the sole true Stalinist voice on the Honolulu Record, while cp:Koji Ariyoshi and the rest were reprimanded as Maoist deviationists. But Obama's later contacts, Ayers, Dohrn, Jeff Jones, Anita Dunn, et al, all opening embraced Maoism. RobSmithdon't bother me 04:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why not just put a heading at the top marked "Smears" and not bother with the rest. Seems that would cover the whole article. --Kels (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Good porn
Hey man, I liked that porn site you enjoy. Can you tell me of some others? Acei9 00:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
You're a fucking liar!
I'd say this over at CP, but would probably get banned for it. Anyway, this is a total lie, and I'm calling you on it here and now.
Where exactly on "Rate My Professor" do the kids speculate about their prof's political views? I checked your link and saw nothing anywhere calling her a "socialist." Not even among the comments, among gems like "she's too hard and doesn't tell us what's on the test!"
Just admit it, you pulled this directly out of your ass, didn't you? Junggai (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, maybe I was a bit hard on you. After re-reading, it seems one student said so in a comment, where you can also read about her "She always dresses nice. She should stop trying to straighten her hair and go natural!" Even if this site were a valid enough resource to put her in the "socialist" category, you're still a fucking liar by using the plural. If you have any integrity, you'll change it to "one student." Junggai (talk) 21:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Serious question
I have a history question or two for you, Rob: First, what do you think of the New Left? Do you see it as connected to communism/socialism? And what about the Democratic Party today? Any connection there? Just curious. Tetronian you're clueless 02:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. Professor Isaac Deutscher rehabed communism in the 1950-60s by resurrecting Trotskyism and "not throwing the Marxist baby out with the Stalinst bathwater." Hence the children of Old Left Stalinists became New Left Trotskyites. A certain segment of these, victims of crimes perpetuated by Great Society spending programs ("mugged by reality") spun off to become the neo-conservative movement.
- The major difference between Democrat and Republican is, the Democrats have never purged themselves of the subversive "blame America crowd." Ann Coulter was wrong when she stated in Treason, "McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover;" [3] with the appointment of a Maoist as White House Communications Director for example, domestic communism has staged an impressive comeback. RobSmithdon't bother me 18:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hardy Har
Oh, you're so witty. If only you weren't a fucking hypocrite at the same time. In other words, now you're acting like that evil witchdoctor Obama by engaging in discussion without actually changing your position. Wait a second!!! Are you a secret Communist Fascist Muslim too? Junggai (talk) 21:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, is this a Godwinism? [4] Dr. Mengele can go straight back to hell along with this healthcare bill. RobSmithdon't bother me 22:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Technically, I think Godwin's Law applies to internet discussions, not crazy-ass blog postings. But in spirit, yes, comparing Obama's healthcare reform to a man who made human lampshades matches the insanity and dumb, cheap fear-mongering that Godwin represents. Junggai (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- The question is govenrment funding, and government control. Mengele worked under the direction of a central command and control, government funded project (believe it or not, designed to reduce unemployment among other things). Right-wing conservatives, then and now, oppose these socialist and statists schemes on principal. RobSmithdon't bother me 23:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm absolutely convinced that right-wing conservatives are shouting "Nazi!" in order to constructively state their position on fiscal conservatism with such nuance as you just described. Those darned liberals just can't take a sound historical comparison with good humor, can they? If only they could be good sports and accept being compared to mass-murderers, mutual respect and understanding would surely replace the current gridlock and petty name-calling that dominate political life in Washington.
- Or did you actually believe the bullshit that you just typed? Junggai (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Conduct says, . Accusations of fascism or comparisons to Hitler are also best avoided, yet we have Conservapedia:Fascism, and Essay:Conservapedia and Fascism, the latter written by the same author identified by name at wp:Conservapedia#Peter_Lipson. Do we have another instance of cp:Liberal deciet? RobSmithdon't bother me 00:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, so we come full circle then. You're admitting that acting like a hypocrite is okay, because there are people of different political persuasions who also act like hypocrites. (At least that's what I could gather from the above word-salad.) If that's really how you feel, then invoke Hitler all you want, and by the "I'm rubber, you're glue" rule, you might even be making a valid point.
- But let's get back to Obama and Mengele, shall we? Do you really believe that conservatives invoke Nazi doctors in their rhetoric to illustrate a nuanced historical point about "government funding and control"? Or are you just blowing smoke over turds to hide the identity of the ones who're laying them? Junggai (talk) 01:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Mengele worked for a social/political system with govenrment funded and controlled healthcare. See cp:Hitler#Health_care_in_Nazi_Germany.
- Remember the Golden Rule, He whose got the gold makes the rules. When the gubmint gots the gold, the gubmint makes the rules doctors who get paid by gubmint follow.
- I oppose gubmint control of healthcare. RobSmithdon't bother me 02:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- And when the Republicans get the gubmint, well, nothing to see here, comrades! --Kels (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Conduct says, . Accusations of fascism or comparisons to Hitler are also best avoided, yet we have Conservapedia:Fascism, and Essay:Conservapedia and Fascism, the latter written by the same author identified by name at wp:Conservapedia#Peter_Lipson. Do we have another instance of cp:Liberal deciet? RobSmithdon't bother me 00:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- The question is govenrment funding, and government control. Mengele worked under the direction of a central command and control, government funded project (believe it or not, designed to reduce unemployment among other things). Right-wing conservatives, then and now, oppose these socialist and statists schemes on principal. RobSmithdon't bother me 23:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Technically, I think Godwin's Law applies to internet discussions, not crazy-ass blog postings. But in spirit, yes, comparing Obama's healthcare reform to a man who made human lampshades matches the insanity and dumb, cheap fear-mongering that Godwin represents. Junggai (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Bernardine Dohrn
Hi Rob, I'm directing this to you since you have a morbid fascination for leftists you can call terrorists and you've been editing this article the most, although it still more or less resembles the source TK lifted it from without attribution in December 2008. I guess that would explain why it's still thin on citations, right? Anyway, there are a few things I'm curious about that perhaps you'd be so good as to source. The article repeatedly refers to Dohrn as a disbarred attorney. What's the source for this? What state? I'll look it up for you if you know. I realize it's tough to source stuff that someone else wrote. Also, footnote 4 doesn't remotely support the claim that she's suspected of committing a murder in San Francisco. I'm pretty sure Conservapedia doesn't care about repeating defamatory statements against people Andy and his pals dislike, but you might as well source them if you can because Conservapedia is the trusworth encyclopedia. Look forward to hearing from you. ![]()
14:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Will look into these. Shooting from the hip, she pleaded (or pled) guilty to bail jumping, was convicted, so can't hold a law licence in any state, AFAIK. The FBI informer, Larry Gratwohl, published a book in 1976 that says Ayers told him Bernardine planted the bomb. No one's ever discredited Gratwohl's sworn testimony before Congressional Committees. only recently did the SF cop union ask to reopen a cold case investigation, and rumors are they may be some physical evidence available thatg could not be processed back than. RobSmithdon't bother me 20:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, conviction of most crimes isn't grounds for disbarment. Only crimes involving dishonest or a person's integrity. I don't think bail jumping counts, but since I don't know what state she was barred up in initially I can't check. She apparently was never an Illinois lawyer, as the records go back before Lincoln and don't get purged merely because someone is convicted of a crime (viz. Ed Vrdolyak). What state was she barred in? You should source the bombing statement in that article if you've got one.

23:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, conviction of most crimes isn't grounds for disbarment. Only crimes involving dishonest or a person's integrity. I don't think bail jumping counts, but since I don't know what state she was barred up in initially I can't check. She apparently was never an Illinois lawyer, as the records go back before Lincoln and don't get purged merely because someone is convicted of a crime (viz. Ed Vrdolyak). What state was she barred in? You should source the bombing statement in that article if you've got one.