Editing User talk:Rpeh

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives: 1

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Your WIGOs115:02, 26 February 2013
Blue can fuck off and die721:45, 23 February 2013
Ace World Tour - 2013606:22, 10 February 2013
You don't like me.522:50, 7 February 2013
I do get annoyed when the new kids decide that the content that brought most people here in the first place needs to be deleted.519:49, 14 January 2013
Sterile for mod217:13, 27 December 2012
"Answer the question."821:20, 27 October 2012
Can you block me as well. I am determined to think I cannot help myself.418:05, 26 October 2012
Foreign language accounts414:53, 29 August 2012
Then112:17, 29 August 2012
Creator of "The Spirit Science"105:31, 10 August 2012
One minor issue115:41, 2 August 2012
Gimp Cock Terrorism108:47, 26 July 2012

First you WIGO a story about a diamond ring, then do one about someone proposing marriage. Hmmm...

SophieWilder14:47, 26 February 2013

The juxtaposition hadn't occurred to me... I have no idea what it signifies!

rpeh •TCE15:02, 26 February 2013
 

Blue can fuck off and die

Please stop moving Roko's basilisk without discussion and blocking people for long durations. This constitutes an abuse of administrative privileges.

Picon small.pngLiquid Blue21:29, 23 February 2013

Fuck off. You bore me.

rpeh •TCE21:30, 23 February 2013

We do have talk pages for this kind of issue you know.

What's the point when they're inhabited by wankers who think that kind of recursively-wanking shit is relevant?

rpeh •TCE21:36, 23 February 2013

Because by using a talk page you can use your eloquence and intelligence to persuade others of the validity of your position. Admittedly this is easier for some than others.

When the users concerned are only concerned with tonguing the balls of the owner of the site, and/or his critics, there's no point debating. That's abundantly clear from the talk page as it already exists. The fixation of some users with LW is ridiculous, especially as there's something close to a 100% link between LW lovers and people criticising others for wanting to keep some kind of focus on CP.

rpeh •TCE21:45, 23 February 2013
 
 
 

Consensus appears to be against you.

David Gerard (talk)21:31, 23 February 2013

I don't care. You're wrong.

rpeh •TCE21:32, 23 February 2013
 
 
 

Ace World Tour - 2013

Hey buddy - I am traveling a lot this year and will be in London mid-June. Drink?

Acei903:33, 10 February 2013

That sounds like a splendid idea. There are a couple of things I have planned later in the year but I should be able to adjust those so they don't clash. Let me know when you'll be around.

rpeh •TCE05:33, 10 February 2013

I'll keep ya posted. I have a lot of people to see and a lot of things to do but I'll be in London at least 2 or 3 days.

Acei905:35, 10 February 2013

If you've got a real schedule clash, and you fancy popping out to the Tower Bridge sort of area, I could always meet you for a pint or two at lunch time. Which also has the advantage that we have a cast-iron excuse to get rid of each other after an hour if we don't get on.

rpeh •TCE05:41, 10 February 2013

Anyway, the whole city will have been taken over by creationism before you get here.

rpeh •TCE05:44, 10 February 2013

I am landing at London City Airport in the early afternoon and will need a drink. Tower Bridge isn't too far from the Canary Wharf area so we can take it from there. If we don't get on I'll smack you in the face with my pint glass.

Acei906:17, 10 February 2013
 
 
 
 
 

You don't like me.

Fine, I don't give a shit. Have the fucking manners to keep it to yourself.

Theory of Practice Peter Tosh > Bob Marley22:08, 7 February 2013

You used to be a decent person. I have no idea what has changed you into the obnoxious shit that currently presents itself to the site but I hope you undo it.

It's not bad manners to point out when somebody who was once nice becomes nasty. I'm trying to get you to wake up and take a long, hard look at yourself.

FFS, what the FUCK has your religious conversion done to you?????????

rpeh •TCE22:11, 7 February 2013

ToP has had a relgious conversion?

Acei922:16, 7 February 2013
 

Maybe religion is part of my attempt to deal with a bunch of shit that's gone horribly wrong lately, I dunno, I'm just fed up. Sorry if I've been acting like a cunt.

Theory of Practice Peter Tosh > Bob Marley22:17, 7 February 2013

How can you believe in something you already know not to exist?

Acei922:42, 7 February 2013
 

All I know is that I used to look forward to reading your posts. These days I see you crop up on RC and instantly assume it's going to be something that annoys me. Changing outlook isn't wrong, and it's one reason I switch from rpeh to SuspectedReplicant, but as least the basis of my beliefs remain reasonably consistent.

In the latest case, I can't believe you're agreeing that shutting down proxy (and even IP) access for everyone because of the actions of one person is a Good Thing. It's a case of one user being an idiot; that user gets shut down; he tries some other things; he gets bored; he goes away.

Yes, other people dealt with a brief vandal attack. I was cooking dinner or I'd have dealt with it myself. That's shit happening.

rpeh •TCE22:50, 7 February 2013
 
 
 

I do get annoyed when the new kids decide that the content that brought most people here in the first place needs to be deleted.

"New kids?" Idiot.

Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made."19:11, 14 January 2013

Wasn't talking to you. Asshat. I really don't know when you started being such a fucking idiot but I wish you'd go back to how you used to be.

rpeh •TCE19:14, 14 January 2013

Sorry, dude. Didn't mean to piss you off -- but seeing as how that thread was populated entirely by old-timers and regulars, I couldn't see any reason to drag the question of "new kids" into it. And referring to a guy who's been here only a few months less than you, and who has been a regular for three years as a "new kid" isn't really helping your argument very much. And hey, I yam what I yam.

Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made."19:26, 14 January 2013

My first girlfriend was seven days older than me. I used to tell her I was only interested because I was into older women.

rpeh •TCE19:29, 14 January 2013

Can barely resist urge to insert "your mother" joke here.

Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made."19:45, 14 January 2013

Well it was the pictures of your mother that got me started. You obviously have better control than I.

rpeh •TCE19:49, 14 January 2013
 
 
 
 
 

Sterile for mod

Sterile.
Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg21:57, 26 December 2012

You like goats so you'll definitely get my vote.

rpeh •TCE10:17, 27 December 2012

This is easily my favorite Mod campaign poster so far, but — help me out here — is that a mohawk or a pompadour on the goat?

Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope17:13, 27 December 2012
 
 

"Answer the question."

I do not bother trying to argue with obvious misogynists, racists, homophobes, as that would imply that they have an "argument" worth engaging with. I can't remember the exact wording, but Woody Allen once said something about how you shouldn't argue with fascists; you should beat them with baseball bats. I can get behind that.

Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out.19:42, 27 October 2012

Nice escape hatch.

Raga Man (talk)19:46, 27 October 2012

How does one answer a question when there is no meaningful question to answer? How does one refute an argument when there is no real argument to refute? A madman stands on the corner screaming that he has proof that the world is going to end tomorrow. Do you bother to discuss his points rationally with him, or do you just move along? A hateful troll leaves a bunch of stupid nonsense on a page, and demands an answer to it. Do you try to reason with the hateful troll, or do you move along?

Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out.19:50, 27 October 2012

Are you really equating me to a crazy person ranting about the end of the world? The only thing I was saying is that I'm tired of hearing how privileged man are, and that being a woman has it's perks too. If somehow, saying that women have it better in some areas is misogyny, I'm a fucking happy misogynist. But that isn't the case and you know this. I know you well enough to know that you're not that stupid.

If you believe that makes me a misogynist, well, I can't do much more than to say I'm not, because I'm not. But keep in mind that "misogyny" has an actual definition and saying that men can't grow a child in them clearly doesn't fall under it. Neither would pointing out that women have THE POSSIBILITY of manipulating men, now if I said that all women do that, that would be misogyny. But I don't say that, because I know better.

I guess you mistook my argument as a man calling the whambulance, instead of a call for objectivity. Maybe it was the sarcastic and hyperbolic way I did it in, but that's me and it's not going to change.

If you'd like to have an honest discussion without unfactual name-calling, that would be nice and if you don't I won't bother you further.

Raga Man (talk)20:09, 27 October 2012

curious. what area do women have a "perk" in? What aspect of our lives are better then men's just by being women? If your answer is "child birth", my answer is 1 in 10,000 women in will die from it. 1 in 4, throughout most of human history. 1 in 1 will have extrem discomfort, serious pain, and real complications.

Green mowse.pngGodotCalibrated! let the voting begin!20:21, 27 October 2012

You are correct, on the other hand men will never feel a little human being kicking inside of them. And from the pregnant women I've met, that's not exactly annoying the first dozen times (although I've heard different things once the play soccer with said women's blatter). Yet, it's a thing men can't experience.

Raga Man (talk)20:41, 27 October 2012
 

Sorry... but why is this on my talk page?

rpeh •TCE20:24, 27 October 2012

Sorry 'bout that...

Raga Man (talk)20:42, 27 October 2012
 
 
 
 
 

Can you block me as well. I am determined to think I cannot help myself.

I am not in control of my trolling. It must be natural for me.

Dirk Steele (talk)12:09, 24 October 2012

Can't be bothered. Sorry.

rpeh •TCE12:48, 24 October 2012

Bothered enough to write a pathetic reply though eh?

Dirk Steele (talk)13:22, 24 October 2012

Yes.

rpeh •TCE16:57, 24 October 2012

But are you bothered because you have free will or are just determined?

Dirk Steele (talk)18:05, 26 October 2012
Ceiling cat.jpg W A R N I N G

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history, and will be visible to anyone. See our privacy policy for further information. To protect your privacy, please log in or create an account

Please note that all contributions to RationalWiki are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA 3.0, or any later version (see RationalWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work unless you have permission.

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Your changes will be visible immediately.

Please note:
 
 
 
 
 

Foreign language accounts

It's just someonbody trying to figure some shit out. I got an e-mail from them explaining what was going on.

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk)12:53, 29 August 2012

Not the one I re-blocked, it isn't. Check out the contents of the page I deleted.

rpeh •TCE13:02, 29 August 2012

Yup, I see. Point taken.

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk)13:04, 29 August 2012

Given we have this do we want a high profile in Arabic?

Judging by the experiments so far I doubt we'll get a very high profile. Besides, those pics are available all over the web and I don't hear much of an outcry.

rpeh •TCE14:53, 29 August 2012
 
 
 
 

Apparently you Commie Bastards don't believe in Free Speech.

John F. Kennedy assassination. Wikipedia. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. Wikipedia. A series of investigation videos by Gill Jesus: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Another series videos from Bob Harris: [8], [9], [3], [10], [11], [12], [7, [13] Was Lee Harvey Oswald really guilty? by Gill Jesus: An website that proves Lee Harvey Oswald was innocent of everything. Compelling Evidence: A New Look at the Assassination of President Kennedy by Michael T. Griffith JFKHistory by Bob Harris: Legitimate facts related to the crime, supporting a case for conspiracy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htxY8_amToY&feature=plcp: A set of released classified CIA documents connect the assassination to the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon, and possible involvement by other U.S. presidents such as Gerald Ford and Lyndon B. Johnson. Jesse Ventura interviews Lee Harvey Oswald's wife to gain more insight into the proof that Oswald was a CIA operative. TheJFKConspiracy.com Rush to Judgment/: Mark Lane's classic documentary on the JFK assassination in which he interviews important witnesses whose statements contradict the conclusions of the Warren Commission. The Murder, The Patsy, The Conspiracy/pg1: A look at the evidence proving conspiracy in the murder. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread710323/pg1: A look at the story of Lee Bowers. An Analysis of Lee Harvey Oswald/pg1: A look at the man who was said to have been the killer of President Kennedy. http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/physical.html http://www.realhistoryarchives.com/collections/assassinations/jfk/basicev.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFSHP5bhNZs: Robert J. Groden, for the first time, shows his optically enhanced films and photographs from that dark day and the investigation and cover-up that followed. Mastered from Mr. Groden’s original materials. Website is dedicated to providing accurate information about Lee Harvey Oswald, as presented by those witnesses The Men Who Killed Kennedy: [14], [15], [16], [17], http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TydmPwb_TRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI07govlUqI&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vkH2ILChHo&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_qQ0FBocFw&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuFDz-Z1jbY&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvRfeLDsB4 Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig was on duty on November 22nd, and made crucial observations. Unlike others, he saw nothing wrong in telling people the truth of what he observed. After his name appeared in books, articles etc., his life changed, not for the better. Attempts were made on his life; his car blew up, he was shot at, and he was practically forced off the road and barely survived the accident. Amongst his many crucial observations at the Plaza, is Oswald running down the Grassy Knoll, being picked up by a slow driving station wagon, heading west in Elm St. after being signaled to. Also the rifle with the clear stamp on the barrel reading "7.65 Mauser" found in the depository. That is only some of the crucial observations he made.

92.15.167.207 (talk)12:16, 29 August 2012

Before whining about free speech, please learn how to speak.

rpeh •TCE12:17, 29 August 2012
 

Creator of "The Spirit Science"

I accidentaly hit "Save page" instead of "Show preview" that was not complete... I have not used wiki formating for a few years and was trying to see how the inline citations work I think "The Spirit Science" falls under the purpose of this wiki [1] [2]

Mrblarg64 (talk)05:29, 10 August 2012

That's okay. When I saw a one line page with a link in it, you triggered my "spam" response. If there's a decent article there then go ahead, but it's going to need to be more than one line.

rpeh •TCE05:31, 10 August 2012
 

One minor issue

Discussion continued implies that people actually want to continue the discussion on Talk:Theology, whereas in reality it's just Proxima... being Proxima

-- Nx / talk15:33, 2 August 2012

That's a very good point. Feel free to change the message to something more appropriate.

rpeh •TCE15:41, 2 August 2012
 

Gimp Cock Terrorism

Thanks for the callout. That sigil isn't technically very good but I'm still proud of the vein on the bottom cock. I've snuck cocks in as extremely low contrast easter eggs in the last few web sites I wrote. Maybe one day I'll be able to take credit for something like this. Cheers.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg22:27, 25 July 2012

I'm not sure which I preferred - the maratrean symbol or the cock PSed onto the bat. Both were clearly works of a genius, albeit a slightly disturbed one ;-)

rpeh •TCE08:47, 26 July 2012
 
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support